Case 3331771

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ

South Hams District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
4 March 2025
Authority
South Hams District Council
Inspector
Reeves K
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
BBH Chartered Architects Ltd
LPA reference
3273/22FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000044
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
11 March 2024

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against South Hams District Council was refused because the Council's refusal of planning permission was not unreasonable. The development did not meet the requirements for a Bat Low Impact Class Licence, and the Council was entitled to require a Reasoned Statement, despite Natural England's guidance on this issue.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 22 October 2024 by K Reeves BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 04 March 2025 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/K1128/W/23/3331771 Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon TQ8 8HJ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, Section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr & Mrs R Guess for a partial award of costs against South Hams District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of new replacement dwelling including existing garage renovation and associated landscaping. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The Council’s third reason for refusal is the subject of the applicants’ costs application.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision It stated that the applicant has not demonstrated that the harm to protected species through loss of a bat roost to facilitate the replacement of an existing dwelling with a larger one is justified by imperative reasons of overriding public interest, contrary to the provisions of DEV26. 4. The applicants’ issue relates to the part of the reason for refusal that sets out that the refused application did not include information to demonstrate that the harm caused to protected species as a result of the loss of a bat roost was justified by imperative reasons of overriding public interest. 5. The Bat Survey Update report, compiled by Green Lane Ecology and dated July 2022, advised that the demolition of the existing dwelling would result in the loss of a summer non-breeding day roost for one Common pipistrelle, which is described in the report as low conservation importance when considering the type of roost and the species of bat which are common and widespread. As such, the report concluded that the works can be registered under a Bat Low Impact Class Licence. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision I acknowledge that Natural England’s guidance sets out that where an identified species is not of regional or national importance and the proposed development includes small scale housing development which affects a bat roost (including the demolition of an existing dwelling or building), a ‘Reasoned Statement’ is categorically not required. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision I acknowledge that Natural England’s guidance sets out that where an identified species is not of regional or national importance and the proposed development includes small scale housing development which affects a bat roost (including the demolition of an existing dwelling or building), a ‘Reasoned Statement’ is categorically not required. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/K1128/W/23/3331771 7. However, it needs to be borne in mind that Natural England make the decision whether or not to grant a license, and the decision maker needs to be confident that there would be a reasonable prospect of the licence being granted by Natural England in order for planning permission to be granted. Given that a license can only be granted by Natural England if the development meets three derogation tests, the Council refusing the application on the basis that it was not demonstrated that the development is necessary for imperative reasons of overriding public interest was not unreasonable. 8. Therefore, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not occurred and an award of costs is not warranted.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 K Reeves

Sheerwater, Devon Road, Salcombe, Devon, TQ8 8HJ — South Hams District Council — K Reeves INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Flood risk
Against appellant
¶3

The applicants failed to demonstrate that the harm to protected species through loss of a bat roost was justified by imperative reasons of overriding public interest, contrary to the provisions of DEV26.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶5

The applicants' issue relates to the part of the reason for refusal that sets out that the refused application did not include information to demonstrate that the harm caused to protected species as a result of the loss of a bat roost was justified by imperative reasons of overriding public interest.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶7

The Council was entitled to require a Reasoned Statement, despite Natural England's guidance on this issue, as the development did not meet the requirements for a Bat Low Impact Class Licence.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
DEV26
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 March 2025 under the Open Government Licence.