Land at Bulls Quarry Road Coordinates 376979 14506, Frome, BA11 5BN
Somerset Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 18 January 2024
- Authority
- Somerset Council
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Outline
- Development type
- Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Appellant
- Ms Tammy Barney
- LPA reference
- 2022/1699/OUT
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 31 October 2023
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed as the outline application did not allow for consideration of the proposal. The inspector found that the merits of the scheme had not been assessed. The application for costs was refused.
PDF text
Land at Bulls Quarry Road Coordinates 376979 14506, Frome, BA11 5BN — Somerset Council — Costs Decision by H Nicholls FdA MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 June 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/E3335/W/23/3330385 Land at Bulls Quarry Road Coordinates 376979 14506, Frome, BA11 5BN • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Ms Tammy Barney for a full award of costs against Somerset Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for change of use to create 2no. gypsy caravan pitches, with associated works (outline application) (part retrospective). Decision 1. The application for costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.
Land at Bulls Quarry Road Coordinates 376979 14506, Frome, BA11 5BN — Somerset Council — Costs Decision Costs can only be awarded in relation to unnecessary or wasted expense at the appeal stage, but behaviour and actions at the time of the planning application can be taken into account in the Inspector’s consideration of whether or not costs should be awarded. 4. The appellant seeks a full award of costs on the basis that the appeal would have been unnecessary had the Council properly assessed the application, by means such as taking proper account of the appellant’s status and by undertaking its responsibilities under the Public Sector Equality Duty. 5. However, as I found that the application type proposed (outline) would not allow for consideration of the proposal in any event, the merits of the scheme have not been assessed and the appeal has been dismissed. As such, I do not find that wasted expense has been incurred as a result of the Council’s actions. 6. For the reasons outlined, the application for costs is refused.
Land at Bulls Quarry Road Coordinates 376979 14506, Frome, BA11 5BN — Somerset Council — H Nicholls INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶4
The appellant claimed that the Council failed to properly assess the application and failed to undertake its responsibilities under the Public Sector Equality Duty.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶5
The inspector found that the Council's actions did not result in wasted expense as the merits of the scheme had not been assessed due to the outline application.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| PPG (Planning Practice Guidance) | |
| Public Sector Equality Duty |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 18 January 2024 under the Open Government Licence.