Case 3330086

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF

Leicester City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
20 February 2024
Authority
Leicester City Council
Inspector
Wilson D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Pete Silke
LPA reference
20230752
ONS LPA code
E06000016
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
13 December 2023

Summary AI

The appeal for retrospective planning permission for a two-storey dwellinghouse with dormers at 42 Hampshire Road, Leicester, was dismissed due to the harm caused to the character and appearance of the area and host dwelling.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 February 2024 by D Wilson BSc (Hons) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20 February 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/W2465/W/23/3330086 42 Hampshire Road, Leicester LE2 8HF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Pete Silke against the decision of Leicester City Council. • The application Ref 20230752, dated 29 May 2023, was refused by notice dated 31 July 2023. • The development proposed is retrospective planning for application no 20161613 construction of one two storey dwellinghouse with dormers at front (1x3 bed) (class c3) (amended plans received 21/11/2016). Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. In December 2023 a revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) was published. However, in respect of the main issues for consideration in this appeal, the revised Framework has not changed Government Policy and so the cases for the appeal parties have not been prejudiced. I shall consider the appeal accordingly.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — Appeal Decision In respect of the paragraphs submitted that are no longer correct, I have considered the most relevant paragraph in the current Framework. 3. At the time of my site visit, I saw that the development, apart from the porch, was substantially complete and I have dealt with the appeal on that basis. Main Issue 4. The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and host dwelling. Reasons 5. No 42 Hampshire Road is a detached two storey dwelling that is sited within a narrow plot. The wider area is predominantly residential and dwellings opposite the appeal site, are mostly terraced and have a similar design and appearance to each other which results in a symmetry and rhythm within the street scene. 6. The Council state that the appeal site was previously granted planning permission1 for a new dwelling. However, the dwelling in situ was not constructed in accordance with the approved plans and has resulted in a reduction in overall height, width and has also been designed differently with 1 20161613 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W2465/W/23/3330086 the two dormers, windows and doors being in different positions. A proposed porch and stone window cills have also not been installed. 7. Dormers are not common in the area, but I acknowledge that the provision of these have been accepted by the Council through the previous application. 8. The two dormers that have been constructed take up a large proportion of the roof slope through their overall height, width and sitting that extends towards the eaves. While I acknowledge that the changes from the previous approval may be minor, the result is that the dormers are out of proportion with the rest of the host dwelling. They are the dominant features within the street scene and therefore stand out as incongruous and unsympathetic features. 9. The windows do not have any cills which the Council consider to be poor design. However, window cills are not common features within the street scene and therefore the absence of these does not harm the appearance of the host dwelling or symmetry and rhythm within the street scene. 10. Notwithstanding my findings on the window cills, I conclude that the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area and host dwelling.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — Appeal Decision It would be contrary to Policy CS03 of the Leicester City local development framework Core Strategy adopted July 2014 and Paragraphs 131 and 139 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). Amongst other things, these seek to ensure high quality, well designed developments that contribute positively to the character and appearance of the local natural and built environment. Other Matters 11. I note the appellant’s willingness to construct the proposed porch. However, this would not outweigh the harm I have found. 12. The appellant has referenced planning permission2 in an attempt to support the appeal proposal. I have not been provided with enough information to compare this application to the appeal proposal before me, in any case, each case must be considered on its own merits. 13. The Council raise concern that the design of the dwelling has been diminished from the previous approval. I also note that Paragraph 140 of the Framework states that Local planning authorities should seek to ensure that the quality of approved development is not materially diminished between permission and completion.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — Appeal Decision However, I am only in a position to consider the planning merits of the appeal proposal before me, which I have done in this case. Conclusion 14. For the reasons set out above, having had regard to the development plan read as a whole, and all other material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 D Wilson

42 Hampshire Road , Leicester , Leicestershire , LE2 8HF — Leicester City Council — D Wilson INSPECTOR 2 20080515 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8-10

The dormers take up a large proportion of the roof slope and are out of proportion with the rest of the host dwelling, making them the dominant features in the street scene.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy CS03 of the Leicester City local development framework Core Strategy adopted July 2014
Determinative
Paragraphs 131 and 139 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 February 2024 under the Open Government Licence.