Case 3328052

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS

London Borough of Barnet — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
29 April 2024
Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Inspector
Livingstone C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
UPP
LPA reference
23/1411/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000003
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
16 January 2024

Summary AI

The appeal to create two front doors to the existing flats at 49 Woodville Road was dismissed due to the potential harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal was found to be contrary to several local planning policies, including the London Plan and the Barnet Local Plan. Although the proposal would allow for greater privacy for residents and reduce the risk of transmission of infectious diseases, these benefits were not sufficient to outweigh the harm identified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 25 March 2024 by C Livingstone MA(SocSci) (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 29th April 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/W/23/3328052 49 Woodville Road, Golders Green, Barnet, London NW11 9TS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by UPP against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Barnet. • The application Ref is 23/1411/FUL . • The development proposed is the creation of two front doors to the existing flats. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 3. The application site is in a predominantly residential area, comprised of mainly two-storey terraced, single family, properties that are designed to mirror their neighbour on one side. Although the front elevation of some properties have been altered over time, they retain a single front entrance door and most remain symmetrical with their neighbour. The appeal property, 49 Woodville Road (No.49) is mid terrace and was previously converted in to two flats.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The flats are currently accessed via a single door on the front elevation and there are two separate entrance doors for each flat from within the porch. 4. The proposal is for alterations to allow for the formation of two separate entrance doors on the front elevation. The doors would be next to each other and would be a dark colour to ensure they appeal recessive in the street scene. 5. However, while it is acknowledged that the appeal property has been altered in the past, it retains a degree of symmetry with neighbouring property 51 Woodville Road (No.51). Also, despite being converted, the appeal property appears as a single family dwelling. The formation of two separate entrance doors on the front elevation would imbalance the appearance of No.49 and neighbouring property No.51 and harm the residential character of the area which is defined by single family dwellings. 6. For the reasons detailed above the proposal would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The development is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy CS5 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document 2012 (CS) and Policy DM01 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The development is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy CS5 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document 2012 (CS) and Policy DM01 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/23/3328052 2012 (DPD). These policies require that development, among other things, responds to the existing character of a place by identifying the special and valued features and characteristics that are unique to the locality and respects local context and distinctive local character. 7. The proposal is also contrary to the guidance provided within the Local Plan Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guidance 2016 (RDG). Section 15 of this guidance acknowledges that a good conversion should result in minimum external alterations and that replacing the existing front door with two doors next to each other should be avoided. 8. Policy CS1 of the CS relates to Barnet’s overarching place shaping strategy and is not relevant in the detailed assessment of alterations to the building. Other Matters 9. My attention has been drawn to three other properties within the area at 46, 48 and 68 Woodville Road. However, these properties have a front door with a side window or side panel and as such do not form a direct parallel to the appeal proposal. Conclusion 10. The proposal would allow for greater privacy for residents and in creating an independent entrance for each flat.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision This may also reduce the risk of transmission of infectious diseases. However, the benefits in these respects are not sufficient to outweigh the harm I have identified above. 11. For the reasons given above the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 C Livingstone

49 Woodville Road, LONDON, NW11 9TS — London Borough of Barnet — C Livingstone INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5

The formation of two separate entrance doors would imbalance the appearance of No.49 and neighbouring property No.51, and harm the residential character of the area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The proposal would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7

The proposal is contrary to the guidance provided within the Local Plan Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guidance 2016.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The proposal is contrary to Policy CS1 of the CS.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
London Plan 2021 Policy D3
Determinative
Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document 2012 Policy CS5
Determinative
Barnet’s Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document 2012 Policy DM01
Determinative
Barnet’s Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document 2012 Policy CS1
Moderate
Local Plan Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guidance 2016
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 29 April 2024 under the Open Government Licence.