Case 3327281

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE

London Borough of Barnet — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
13 March 2024
Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Inspector
Livingstone C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
DPA (London) Ltd
LPA reference
23/2504/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000003
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 November 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed dwelling's impact on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of the occupants of No 27. The proposal was found to be contrary to various policies in the development plan, including the National Planning Policy Framework and the London Plan.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 29 January 2024 by C Livingstone MA(SocSci) (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13th March 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/W/23/3327281 27 Dale Grove, North Finchley, Barnet, London N12 8EE • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made c/o Agent DPA (London) Ltd against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Barnet. • The application Ref 23/2504/FUL, dated 8 June 2023, was refused by notice dated 31 July 2023. • The development proposed is described as ‘ the erection of a detached single family dwelling together with parking and landscaping, following the demolition of the existing out-building.’ Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) was revised in December 2023. As the changes do not materially affect the main issues in this case, the parties have not been invited to make further comments. Main Issues 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The main issues are: • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No 27 Dale Grove (No 27) with regard to external amenity space; and • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for its future occupiers in terms of light and outlook. Reasons Character and appearance 4. The application site is in a residential area, comprising of mainly two storey, semi-detached and terraced properties with attractive bay frontages that face the road. Spaces between buildings are limited so that the street appears built up. In contrast most properties have relatively large rear gardens some with ancillary sheds and outbuildings that occupy a small proportion of the space. The rear gardens provide a spacious backdrop to the densely built development along the street frontages within the area. Their mature and attractive appearance is apparent from surrounding properties and contributes to the area’s character and appearance. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/23/3327281 5. No.27 is a traditional end of terrace dwelling. It has an existing access from Dale Grove which runs close to the gable end of the property and provides access to the rear. At the time of my site visit construction work was taking place to the rear of No.27. However, the land to the rear of the property is clearly currently private garden ground and includes ancillary outbuildings along the rear boundary. 6. The proposal is for the removal of the existing outbuildings to allow for excavation of the site to create a dwellinghouse over two floors, one above ground and one below. The proposed dwelling would face the rear elevation of No 27 and would be accessed via the existing access. Although limited in its overall height and massing above ground the proposed dwelling would be noticeably higher than the surrounding boundary treatment and prominent in its local context. This would be exacerbated by the form and design of the proposed dwelling which would be a distinct departure from the architectural style of the majority of the surrounding properties.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Further, the development would introduce significant areas of hardstanding and retaining walls which would notably alter the garden character of the site. As a result, the proposed dwelling would appear as a prominent and incongruous feature which would detract from the open, spacious, and mature rear garden environment and would be detrimental to the established pattern of development. 7. I appreciate that due to its siting and design the proposed dwelling would not be a significant feature within the street scene. Nevertheless, it would appear prominent and out of place when viewed from the rear of the surrounding properties and, given the constrained nature of the site and proposed hardstanding and retaining walls, providing landscaping would not ameliorate these concerns. 8. For these reasons the proposed dwellinghouse would have a harmful effect on the established pattern of development and would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2011) (LonP), Policy CS5 The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 2010 (CS), Policy DM01 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) 2014 (DMD).

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision These policies require new development to respect local context and have due regard to existing and emerging street hierarchy, building types, forms and proportions; and be based on understanding of local characteristics. Living conditions of neighbours 9. As detailed above the majority of properties in the area have relatively large rear gardens that adequately accommodate the needs of occupants. The proposed development would take up a large area of the rear garden of No 27. A small garden to the front of the existing property is bound by a low wall and is used for the storage of bins. The existing access to the side of No 27 is hard surfaced and would provide vehicular and pedestrian access to the proposed dwelling. 10. Both the front garden and driveway service the house, are open to public view, and do not constitute private outdoor amenity spaces. The retained outdoor amenity area for No 27 would meet the minimum area requirement of 40 square metres as set out within section 2.3 of the Local Plan Supplementary Planning Document: Sustainable Design and Construction 2016 (SPD). However, there is extant planning permission for the erection of two extensions https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/23/3327281 to No 27. If these extensions were erected the remaining outdoor amenity space for this property would be significantly lower than the minimum area required by the SPD. 11. A planning condition to restrict an extant planning permission would not meet the tests set out in paragraph 56 of the Framework, and there is no mechanism before me to prevent the approved extensions from being constructed. As such I am not satisfied the sufficient external amenity space would remain for No 27 to allow the occupants to carry out typical activities associated with a family home of this size including space for children to play, to hang out washing, or sit outdoors. 12. Therefore, the proposed development would have a harmful effect on the living conditions of the occupants of No 27 with regard to external amenity space. The proposal is contrary to Policies DM01 and DM02 of the DMD. These policies seek to ensure that new developments do not have a demonstrably harmful impact on residential amenity and should retain outdoor amenity space. 13. I do not have sufficient information before me to assess the proposal in relation to Policy D6 of the LonP.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Policy CS4 of the CS does not relate specifically to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants. Living condition of future occupants 14. As detailed above the proposal includes a lower ground floor, it also includes the erection of retaining walls to allow for the formation of a patio area at lower ground level and the installation of French doors and windows to serve this floor. Accommodation on the lower ground floor includes a bedroom that would be served by glazed French doors that face northeast and look out at the retaining wall. 15. The Councils concerns are centred on the acceptability of the lower ground floor bedroom. I accept that, due to the orientation of the French doors that would serve this room, future occupants would be likely to experience lower light levels than the other rooms on the lower ground floor. However, this room is modest, and the glazed doors would provide a relatively large opening, which would maximise available light. Further, the doors would open out on to an external amenity area and there is a degree of separation between the opening and the side retaining wall which is of a significant height.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Given the particular site arrangement, size of the bedroom and the proposed French door opening I am satisfied that future occupants would have adequate light and a suitable outlook. 16. As such the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants in terms of light and outlook. Therefore, the proposal is in accordance with Policy D6 the LonP, Policy CS4 of CS, Policies DM01 and DM02 of the DMD. These policies require housing development to be inviting and designed to allow for adequate daylight, sunlight and outlook for future occupiers. Other Matters 17. My attention has been drawn to similar developments to the rear of 22 Hutton Grove (approved 1995) and 40/42 Hutton Grove and 26 Dale Grove (approved in 2006) and 28 Dale Grove. These developments are outliers in relation to the predominant pattern of development and do not form a defining characteristic https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/23/3327281 of the area. Further, based on the evidence before me, they were approved prior to the adoption of the current development plan, or permitted through historical lawful development certificates. As such, these examples do not lead me to a different conclusion on the main issues. 18. Examples of other developments in the area, such as commercial buildings have been provided in support of the proposal. However, due to the nature of their current or former use, these sites are not comparable. 19. The absence of harm in relation to highways or other aspects of the living conditions of future occupants or the occupants of neighbouring properties are neutral factors which weigh neither for nor against the proposal. 20. The development would make a positive contribution to the supply of housing in an accessible location. However, in the context of a single dwelling these are matters to which I attribute limited weight. Conclusion 21. The proposed dwelling would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants in terms of outlook and light within the bedroom.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, the proposal would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area and would have a detrimental effect on the living conditions of the occupants of No 27. 22. Overall, the proposal conflicts with the development plan and the material considerations do not indicate that the appeal should be decided other than in accordance with it.

Page 4 · Chunk 10 C Livingstone

27 Dale Grove, LONDON, N12 8EE — London Borough of Barnet — C Livingstone INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6-8

The proposed dwelling would be a distinct departure from the architectural style of the surrounding properties and would detract from the open, spacious, and mature rear garden environment.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶10-12

The proposed development would take up a large area of the rear garden of No 27, leaving insufficient external amenity space for the occupants to carry out typical activities associated with a family home of this size.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶14-16

The proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants in terms of light and outlook, with a relatively large opening of the French doors and a degree of separation between the opening and the side retaining wall.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2011)
Determinative
Policy CS5 The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 2010
Determinative
Policy DM01 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) 2014
Determinative
Policy DM02 of the Improving Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) 2014
Determinative
Policy D6 of the London Plan (2011)
Substantial
Policy CS4 of CS
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 March 2024 under the Open Government Licence.