Case 3327087

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP

Harlow District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 February 2024
Authority
Harlow District Council
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Appellant
D P Lawless Limited
LPA reference
HW/FUL/23/00155
ONS LPA code
E07000073
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 November 2023

Summary AI

The appeal for an additional storey to an existing building to provide offices was dismissed due to the proposed development's harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area. The inspector found that the use of only metal cladding and a castellated design would be at odds with the surrounding buildings. While the development could provide benefits, these were outweighed by the harm identified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 25 January 2024 by Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge BA (Hons) MTP MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 07.02.2024 Appeal Ref: APP/N1540/W/23/3327087 20 South Road, Harlow, Essex CM20 2AP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Derek Lawless of D P Lawless Ltd against the decision of Harlow District Council. • The application Ref HW/FUL/23/00155, dated 6 April 2023, was refused by notice dated 4 July 2023. • The development proposed is additional storey to an existing single storey building to provide offices above a warehouse. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. A revised version of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published on 19 December 2023. There were no substantive changes of relevance to this appeal. Amended paragraph numbers are referenced below. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 4. The appeal site is located on the corner of South Road and Central Road in an industrial estate on the northern edge of Harlow.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision The site contains a single storey building at the end of a long terrace of industrial units as well as an area of hardstanding to one side. The main building has a gable ended roof which is replicated along much of the terrace and on the terrace opposite in a zigzag fashion. A flat roof extension is positioned to the side adjacent to the hardstanding. Like much of the terrace, the building is constructed from brick with a metal roof and metal cladding at the rear. 5. Due to its corner location, the existing building is prominent from the surrounding streets. It forms part of a coherent street scene along this part of South Road in terms of building heights and materials. Nevertheless, there have been alterations to units within the terrace. Some have front porches. There are flat roof units at Nos 9 and 10, metal cladding on the front gable at No 8, and two storey units at Nos 4 to 7 with brick and render at ground floor and metal cladding at first floor. Buildings to the north, east and south-east of the site are two storey with a mix of brick, render and metal cladding.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, while the character and appearance of the area is varied, it benefits from a range of materials including the use of brick on most buildings. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, while the character and appearance of the area is varied, it benefits from a range of materials including the use of brick on most buildings. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N1540/W/23/3327087 6. The proposed development would remove the gable roof in favour of a shallow pitched roof set behind parapet walls. The building would be around half a metre taller than the apex of the existing roof with a larger box-like form. A front porch would be added. The external materials would be silver and dark grey metal cladding and uPVC windows. 7. While the proposed development would be taller than much of the remaining terrace, the overall height would be similar to Nos 4 to 7 and other buildings nearby and the addition of porch would not be out of keeping. However, the use of only metal cladding with no brick or even render would result in a stark and uncompromising appearance. There would also be an awkward castellated design where the silver cladding meets the dark grey cladding that would be at odds with buildings in the surrounding area. Thus, the proposed development because of its materials would be overly prominent, incongruous and unattractive and result in harm to the character and appearance of the area. 8. Materials can often be conditioned to match the existing building or be approved via the submission of samples.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision However, the plans and application form clearly show metal cladding and so it would not be reasonable to significantly alter the design within the parameters of what has been applied for. The appellant could discuss suitable materials and design with the Council as part of any resubmission. 9. The enlarged building would provide more office and workshop space to benefit future occupants. Although the evidence before me is limited, I note that the building dates from the early phase of Harlow New Town and could benefit from refurbishment. It could also encourage the renewal of other units in this terrace. However, these benefits could be realised through a better overall design and so they do not outweigh the harm I have identified. 10. In conclusion, the proposed development would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area. Therefore, it would not accord with Policy PL1 of the Harlow Local Development Plan 2020 which, amongst other things, seeks a high standard of urban and architectural design for all development that responds to the scale, height, massing, architectural details, materials and front boundary treatments of the surrounding area and is visually attractive.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Appeal Decision It would also not adhere to NPPF paragraph 139 which says that development which is not well designed should be refused, especially where it fails to reflect local design policies. Conclusion 11. For the above reasons, and having had regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge

20 South Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2AP — Harlow District Council — Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The proposed development would be overly prominent, incongruous and unattractive, and result in harm to the character and appearance of the area. The use of only metal cladding and a castellated design would be at odds with the surrounding buildings.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶8

The inspector noted that the plans and application form clearly show metal cladding, and it would not be reasonable to significantly alter the design within the parameters of what has been applied for.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy PL1 of the Harlow Local Development Plan 2020
Determinative
NPPF paragraph 139
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 February 2024 under the Open Government Licence.