Case 3324763

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF

Reading Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
26 February 2024
Authority
Reading Borough Council
Inspector
Praine N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
M Ashraf
LPA reference
221905
ONS LPA code
E06000038
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
24 November 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed variation of the condition conflicting with the original description of development, in line with the Finney judgement.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by N Praine BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — by N Praine BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 26th February 2024

Page 1 · Chunk 1 73 Mount Pleasant, Reading RG1 2TF

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — 73 Mount Pleasant, Reading RG1 2TF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the Act) against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by M Ashraf against the decision of Reading Borough Council. • The application Ref 221905, dated 1 August 2022, was refused by notice dated 12 April 2023. • The application sought planning permission for development described as the change of use from dwellinghouse (Class C3) to 5 bedroom small HMO (Class C4) including a single storey rear extension without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 220045, dated 10 May 2022.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 73 Mount Pleasant, Reading RG1 2TF

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — 73 Mount Pleasant, Reading RG1 2TF • The condition to be varied is No 2 which states that: The development hereby permitted shall ONLY be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Location Plan – 1930 EX10-001 Received on 12/01/2022 Proposed South Elevation – 1930 PL13-101b Proposed North Elevation – 1930 PL13-102a Proposed Ground Floor Plan – 1930 PL13-001b Proposed First Floor Plan – 1930 PL13-002b Proposed Second Floor Plan – 1930 PL13-003c Proposed Roof Plan – 1930 PL13-004b Proposed East & West Elevations – 1930 PL13-100c Proposed Site Plan – 1930 PL10-002b Received on 07/04/2022. • The reason given for the condition is: For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure that the development is carried out and adhered to in accordance with the application form and associated details hereby approved.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”)

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”)

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/E0345/W/23/3324763 (Class C4), including a single storey rear extension1. The current appeal seeks permission to vary the approved drawings to increase the number of bedrooms in the HMO from 4 to 5. 4. The main issue is whether or not the variation of the condition would fundamentally affect the description of development of the planning permission originally granted. Reasons 5. The Finney judgement sets out that a section 73 application may not be used to obtain planning permission that would require a variation to the ‘operative’ part of the planning permission, in other words, the description of development for which planning permission has already been granted. 6. It follows from Finney that where amending a condition would result in a conflict between the new condition and the description of development, then that particular amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made. 7. The appeal proposal seeks to vary the approved plans to increase the number of HMO bedrooms from 4 to 5.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”)

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 4-bedroom house of multiple occupancy (“HMO”) The proposal would consequently result in a discrepancy with the original description of development and, were I to allow it, would fundamentally change the description of development that has been originally asked for. 8. The variation of the condition proposed under this appeal would fail to accord with the principles set out in Finney. The appeal must therefore be dismissed on that ground and there is no need for me to consider the wider areas of dispute. Conclusion 9. For the reasons set out above, I dismiss this appeal.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 N Praine

73 Mount Pleasant, Reading, RG1 2TF — Reading Borough Council — N Praine INSPECTOR 1 Reading Borough Council Ref: 220045 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

The Finney judgement sets out that a section 73 application may not be used to obtain planning permission that would require a variation to the ‘operative’ part of the planning permission.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7

The proposal would result in a discrepancy with the original description of development and fundamentally change the description of development that has been originally asked for.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Finney v Welsh Ministers & Others [2019] EWCA Civ 1868
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 26 February 2024 under the Open Government Licence.