259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG
London Borough of Ealing — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Authority
- London Borough of Ealing
- Inspector
- Teasdale N
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Other
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Ocarina Management Ltd
- LPA reference
- 230299VAR
- ONS LPA code
- E09000009
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 6 December 2023
Summary AI
The appeal is dismissed as the proposed development seeks to vary a condition under Section 73, which would result in a conflict with the original description of the development.
PDF text
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — by N Teasdale BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 30 April 2024
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — 259 Acton Lane, Ealing, Chiswick W4 5DG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Ocarina Management Ltd against the decision of London Borough of Ealing. • The application Ref is 230299VAR. • The application sought planning permission for conversion of building into three self- contained residential units; single storey rear extension; alterations from hip to gable end; rear roof extension to main roofslope; installation of two rooflights to front roofslope; associated internal and external alterations including changes to front, side and rear elevations fenestration (following demolition of external staircase and demolition of existing garages at rear of no. 259 Acton Lane); and provision of refuse and cycle storage (revised description) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 222053FUL, dated 8 December 2022. • The condition in dispute is No.
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — 259 Acton Lane, Ealing, Chiswick W4 5DG 2 which states that: the development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawings titled: 1 (REV.A), 2 (REV.A), 3 (REV.A), 4 (REV.E), 5 (REV.E), 6 (REV.E), 7 (REV.E), 8 (REV.E), 9 (REV.B). • The reason given for the condition is: for the avoidance of doubt and in the interest of proper planning.
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — references to increase the size of the rearmost unit from one bed to two bed. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — references to increase the size of the rearmost unit from one bed to two bed. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/A5270/W/23/3323684 3. In doing so however, the current appeal under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 would obtain a permission that would require a variation to the terms of the ‘operative’ part of the planning permission, that is, the description of the development for which the original permission was granted. To this end, the original permission as set out above reads, ‘Conversion of building into three self-contained residential units; single storey rear extension; alterations from hip to gable end; rear roof extension to main roofslope; installation of two rooflights to front roofslope; associated internal and external alterations including changes to front, side and rear elevations fenestration (following demolition of external staircase and demolition of existing garages at rear of no. 259 Acton Lane); and provision of refuse and cycle storage (revised description)’. Bold emphasised by the Inspector. 4. There are no powers under Section 73 of the Act to grant a new planning permission with a different operative part to that contained in the original permission.
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — references to increase the size of the rearmost unit from one bed to two bed. If amending a condition would result in a conflict between it and the description of development, then that particular amendment is beyond the powers under Section 73 and cannot be made (a fresh planning application would be required). Accordingly, as a conflict has arisen with the original description of the development, the appeal cannot therefore be dealt with under Section 73 and will be dismissed on this ground. In such circumstances, there is no need to consider any of the wider issues. Conclusion 5. For the reasons given, the appeal is dismissed.
259 Acton Lane, LONDON, W4 5DG — London Borough of Ealing — N Teasdale INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶4
The Inspector found that there are no powers under Section 73 to grant a new planning permission with a different operative part to that contained in the original permission, and that amending the condition would result in a conflict with the original description of the development.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Town and Country Planning Act 1990 |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 30 April 2024 under the Open Government Licence.