Case 3321913

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG

Blaby District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
26 January 2024
Authority
Blaby District Council
Inspector
Allen K
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
EkoJoe Community Interest Company
LPA reference
22/0989/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000129
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
9 October 2023

Summary AI

The appeal for the proposed organic market garden and wellbeing hub was dismissed due to various concerns including flood risk, highway safety, and conflict with local policies. The proposal would increase potential conflicts on the highway, detract from highway safety, and not be in an accessible location. The inspector also noted that the proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and that there were no material considerations that would outweigh this conflict.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by K Allen MEng (Hons) MArch PGCert ARB

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — by K Allen MEng (Hons) MArch PGCert ARB an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 26th January 2024

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Mill Lane Farm, Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — Mill Lane Farm, Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Claire Cooke of EkoJoe Community Interest Company against the decision of Blaby District Council. • The application Ref 22/0989/FUL, dated 6 November 2022, was refused by notice dated 27 March 2023. • The development proposed is described as ‘Ekojoe is a community interest company intending to transform the site to an organic market garden, creating a hub to support and educate the local community on a healthier lifestyle and sustainability. Ekojoe has a mission to protect the environment, we have a huge local following, and are supported by the local county council who we liaise with frequently to offer our support to some of the most vulnerable members of the local community. We require the change of use to be for agricultural purposes. At present the land is a disused field which has been previously used as a horse paddock. Ekojoe plan to complete the following steps to make this space an organic market garden and wellbeing hub: 1. Level the ground to make it accessible for workers and volunteers, using a no dig method. Adding manure to soil. 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Mill Lane Farm, Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — Mill Lane Farm, Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG Securing access to field with wooden fencing and gateway entrance to the field to make it accessible for workers and volunteers. 3. Build a non-permanent structure: poly tunnel measuring 7.3m wide, 3.6m deep, 3m high. This will be positioned on the field. The poly tunnel will be ground level. It will be used to grow fruit and vegetables. 4. Build a non-permanent structure: porta cabin measuring 4.8m length by 10m wide, 3.6m high. This will be positioned on the field. The portacabin will be raised from the ground. It will be used as an ethical farm shop, to sell local produce and refill/reuse station to reduce plastic waste and carbon footprint. Accessed by members of public and volunteers. 5. This will create a community hub focusing on growing your own, zero waste, managing composting and creating a safe community wellbeing space.’

Page 1 · Chunk 3 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/T2405/W/23/3321913 3. Amended plans have been submitted with this appeal which omit the portacabin and portaloo and repositions the poly tunnel. The appeals process should not be used to evolve a scheme. Moreover, the amended plans do not correspond with the description of development and have not been through the consultation process. As such I am not satisfied that all interested parties have had a fair opportunity to comment on the amended drawings and I have not considered them in the determination of this appeal. Main Issues 4. Therefore, in light of the above, the main issues are: • whether the development would be acceptable with respect to flood risk; • the effect of the development on highway safety; and • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local policy. Reasons Flood Risk 5. The appeal site lies within flood zones 2 and 3 as defined by the Environment Agency (EA). A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted to support the positioning of buildings on site. 6. The Blaby Joint Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) (October 2014) is based on modelling produced in 2010.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. The EA now considers the SFRA to be out of date with more up to date modelling now available. The FRA relies on data from 2018 while the most recent EA advice utilises data from both 2018 and 2022 and indicates that the poly tunnel would be positioned within flood zone 2. The Poly Tunnel would be considered ‘Less Vulnerable’ in accordance with Annex 3 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). Consequently, I am satisfied that this aspect of the proposed development would be acceptable with respect to flood risk. 7. Whilst the drawing Plan Ref 4 indicates that the portacabin would also be located within flood zone 2, neither the FRA nor the EA refer to the portacabin. As such I cannot be sure that the portacabin would be located within flood zone 2 when considering the most recent data or that the development would be

Page 2 · Chunk 6 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. | safe for its lifetime without increasing flood risk elsewhere as required by the | | --- | | Framework. |

Page 2 · Chunk 7 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. | safe for its lifetime without increasing flood risk elsewhere as required by the | | --- | | Framework. | 8. Consequently, as I am considering the development as originally submitted, due to lack of information I am unable to determine whether the development would be acceptable with respect to flood risk. As such, I must take a precautionary approach and find that the proposal would conflict with CS22 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013) (CSDPD) which seeks to ensure that development is directed to locations at the lowest risk of flooding and that mitigation measures are put in place to reduce the effects of flood water. Similarly, the proposal would conflict with the Framework as set out above. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 8 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. 8. Consequently, as I am considering the development as originally submitted, due to lack of information I am unable to determine whether the development would be acceptable with respect to flood risk. As such, I must take a precautionary approach and find that the proposal would conflict with CS22 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013) (CSDPD) which seeks to ensure that development is directed to locations at the lowest risk of flooding and that mitigation measures are put in place to reduce the effects of flood water. Similarly, the proposal would conflict with the Framework as set out above. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 9 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. Appeal Decision APP/T2405/W/23/3321913 Highway Safety 9. The appeal site is located off of The Ford which is closed to motorised vehicles, except for access. The Ford then joins, Mill Lane, a narrow adopted, unclassified road with no separate footpaths or lighting. There are numerous Public Rights of Way (PROW) in the area as well as a number of stables. In addition, Blaby Cemetery is located a short distance to the south, with access required via Mill Lane. 10. The information submitted with the original application indicates that the proposal would provide numerous activities on site and would be open to members of the public as well as volunteers. No information has been provided as to the expected numbers visiting the site and the associated trip generation. Given the aspirations of the proposal it would be reasonable to assume there would be an evident intensification of use of the surrounding road network. 11. The proposal does not include for any offroad parking provision or alterations to the surrounding road network. Whilst the appellant indicates that it would be encouraged to access the site on foot or by bike, there is no mechanism before me which would secure this.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. As such, it is likely that at least some of the site’s users would arrive via private motorised vehicles with parking on Mill Lane. Accordingly, due to the intensification of use of the surrounding narrow roads and the prevalence of pedestrians, cyclists, and horse riders in the area, I am satisfied that the proposal would lead to an increase in potential conflicts on the highway, detrimentally affecting highway safety. 12. Therefore, without further highways information pertaining to the original proposal, I conclude that the proposal would harm highway safety. It would conflict with Policy CS10 of the CSDPD and Policy DM8 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Delivery) Development Plan Document (February 2019) (DDPD) where they collectively require appropriate measures to be taken to mitigate the impacts of the development and ensure that it is adequately supported by infrastructure, including parking and servicing provision. There would also be conflict with the Framework, where it requires development to create places that are safe and secure, which minimise the scope for conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles. Location 13.

Page 3 · Chunk 11 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. CSDPD Policy CS1 outlines how growth will be managed within the district, primarily focusing development within urban locations. However, CSDPD Policy CS18 provides support for small scale employment and leisure development within the countryside, subject to consideration of its impacts, including the sustainability of its location. CSDPD Policy CS10 and DDPD Policy DM8 seek to position development within accessible locations, reducing reliance on private motor vehicles and promoting walking, cycling and public transport. 14. The appeal site is located in the countryside outside of the adjacent settlements of Blaby and Glen Parva. There are no public transport routes which provide direct access to the appeal site. However, there are bus services within walking distance in Blaby. Whilst I have concluded above that the proposal would result in the intensification of use of the surrounding road network and that some of the site’s users would arrive via private motorised vehicles, there are numerous pedestrian/cycle routes to the appeal site from Blaby, Glen Parva and South Wigston. Given the number of routes and the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 12 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. Appeal Decision APP/T2405/W/23/3321913 relatively short distances between the surrounding settlements and the appeal site, I am satisfied that there are adequate alternatives to travel via private motorised vehicles. 15. Therefore, I conclude that the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local policy. In terms of its location, the proposal would accord with Policies CS1, CS10 and CS18 of the CSDPD and Policy DM8 of the DDPD where they seek to control development within the district by identifying where growth and development should be focussed and ensuring development would be accessible. Other Matters 16. The proposal would support local residents to build confidence, skills and improve their mental health as well as providing access to affordable fresh food. However, I have not been provided with any details regarding the implementation of these initiatives. As such, the social benefits do not outweigh the harm identified above. Conclusion 17.

Page 4 · Chunk 13 appeal.

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — appeal. While I am satisfied that the proposal would be in an accessible location, for the reasons given above, I conclude that the proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no material considerations, including the Framework and the benefits of the scheme, that would outweigh that conflict. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 14 K Allen

Mill Lane Farm , Mill Lane, Blaby, Leicester, LE8 4FG — Blaby District Council — K Allen INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Flood risk
Against appellant
¶8

The inspector was unable to determine whether the development would be acceptable with respect to flood risk due to a lack of information. A precautionary approach was taken and it was concluded that the proposal would conflict with policies seeking to ensure that development is directed to locations at the lowest risk of flooding and that mitigation measures are put in place to reduce the effects of flood water.

Highway safety
Against appellant
¶11

The inspector concluded that the proposal would lead to an increase in potential conflicts on the highway, detrimentally affecting highway safety. This was due to the intensification of use of the surrounding narrow roads and the prevalence of pedestrians, cyclists, and horse riders in the area.

Other
For appellant
¶15

The inspector concluded that the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local policy. The proposal would accord with policies seeking to control development within the district by identifying where growth and development should be focussed and ensuring development would be accessible.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
CS22 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013)
Determinative
CS10 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013)
Substantial
Policy DM8 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Delivery) Development Plan Document (February 2019)
Substantial
Framework
Substantial
CS1 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013)
Moderate
CS18 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Core Strategy) Development Plan Document (February 2013)
Moderate
Policy DM8 of the Blaby District Local Plan (Delivery) Development Plan Document (February 2019)
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 26 January 2024 under the Open Government Licence.