5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE
Bromsgrove District Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Inspector
- Smith H
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appellant
- Mr Steven Clarke
- LPA reference
- 22/00961/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000234
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 9 August 2023
Summary AI
The inspector found that the Council's refusal of planning permission was unreasonable, leading to unnecessary expenses for the applicant. The applicant was awarded full costs, which will be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed.
PDF text
5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE — Bromsgrove District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 11 October 2023 by H Smith BSc (Hons) MSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 08 November 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/P1805/W/23/3321638 5 Church Road, Belbroughton, Worcestershire DY9 9TE • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Steven Clarke for a full award of costs against Bromsgrove District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the proposed development described as ‘alterations to front boundary to create off street parking, off street bin storage and provision of EV charging point.’ Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. Unreasonable behaviour can relate to procedural matters (i.e. the appeal process) or substantiative matters (i.e.
5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE — Bromsgrove District Council — Costs Decision issues related to the planning merits of the appeal). 4. The applicant considers the reason for refusal to be unreasonable due to the visibility splays calculated by the Local Highway Authority (LHA) being incorrectly calculated and misapplied. Had the LHA applied the correct visibility splays to the proposed access it would have been clear that they can be achieved without crossing third party land, as shown on drawing number 1189- 04A. There would not therefore have been a justifiable reason to recommend the refusal of the application on highway grounds. The applicant feels this caused them unnecessary and/or wasted expense. 5. The application was refused for this reason alone, which was informed by the objection received from the LHA. The Council has since confirmed that had it been in receipt of the LHA advice earlier it would have been minded to approve the application. 6. Whilst concerns from the Parish Council and residents were raised, little evidence has been put forward to support the reason for refusal and establish that the proposal would not result in a safe access as required by Policy BDP16 of the Bromsgrove District Plan 2011-2030 adopted 2017. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE — Bromsgrove District Council — Costs Decision Appeal Decision APP/P1805/W/23/3321638 7. It appears to me that having regard to the provisions of the development plan, national planning policy and other relevant considerations, the development proposed should reasonably have been permitted. The refusal of planning permission therefore constitutes unreasonable behaviour contrary to the guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and the PPG. The applicant has been faced with unnecessary expenses in the form of generating appeal documents, gaining advise from technical experts, and a planning consultant in preparation for the appeal. 8. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has been demonstrated and that a full award of costs is justified. Costs Order 9.
5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE — Bromsgrove District Council — Costs Decision In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bromsgrove District Council shall pay to Mr Steven Clarke, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision; such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. The applicant is now invited to submit to Bromsgrove District Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.
5 Church Road, Belbroughton, STOURBRIDGE, DY9 9TE — Bromsgrove District Council — H Smith INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶4
The Council's refusal of planning permission was due to a misapplication of visibility splays, which was not justified by the Local Highway Authority's objection.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶7
The refusal of planning permission was unreasonable, as the development should have been permitted under the National Planning Policy Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Policy BDP16 of the Bromsgrove District Plan 2011-2030 |
Substantial |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 November 2023 under the Open Government Licence.