Case 3321500

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF

London Borough of Brent — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
12 December 2023
Authority
London Borough of Brent
Inspector
Major R
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
Mr Syed Islam
LPA reference
Application No: 23/0459
ONS LPA code
E09000005
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
22 August 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area. The dormer extension would be visible from public vantage points and would not comply with the Brent Local Plan or National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 13 November 2023 by R Major BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12th December 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/T5150/W/23/3321500 24 Fernwood Avenue, Brent, Wembley HA0 2HF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Syed Islam against the decision of the London Borough of Brent. • The application Ref Application No: 23/0459, dated 9 February 2023, was refused by notice dated 5 April 2023. • The development proposed is proposed loft floor hip to gable with rear dormer, floor plan redesign and all associated works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area. Reasons 3. Number 24 Fernwood Avenue is a first floor flat situated within a two-storey semi-detached property. The appeal site is located on a residential street that runs parallel to, and at a slightly lower land level than, Bridgewater Road, which is a busy classified highway (A4005). 4. This section of Fernwood Avenue is characterised by hipped roof semi-detached properties.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — Appeal Decision The appeal property is typical of the other buildings in this row, which were designed with forward protruding two-storey elements that include a projecting canted style two-storey front bay window. Above these bay windows is an attractive overhanging eaves detail, with a hipped roof design to match the main dwelling. These forward projecting elements, bay windows and the hipped roof design are all positive and defining features of these buildings. The symmetry and consistency in the design of the properties in this row only further adds to the positive contribution they make to the character of the area. Dormer extensions are not a characteristic of Fernwood Avenue. 5. The buildings along this section of Fernwood Avenue do not follow a uniform building line, with the adjacent semi-detached block to the south east, Nos 25, 26, 27 and 28, being set significantly further back from the highway than the appeal property and the other buildings in this row. This set back is so significant that the front elevations of Nos 25, 26, 27 and 28 are set further back than the rear elevations of the other properties in this row, including the appeal property. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/T5150/W/23/3321500 6. The proposed large rear dormer, facilitated by the hip to gable roof enlargement, would unbalance the existing and distinct symmetry enjoyed with the adjoining property, as well as the other properties in this row. Additionally, the appearance of the dormer, with its flat roof design and being set up to the ridge height of the main dwelling, results in a bulky and incongruous form of development that is detrimental to the appearance of the host property, the adjoining property, and street scene in general. 7. Furthermore, the setting of the dormer up to the existing ridge height of the main dwelling also runs contrary to the advice contained within the Council’s ‘Residential Extensions and Alterations’ Supplementary Planning Document 2 (2018) (SPD) which states that rear dormers should be set down from the ridge by at least 0.3m. 8. The visual prominence of the development in the street scene is exacerbated by the significant setback of the neighbouring properties immediately to the southeast, resulting in the side and rear elevations of the appeal property, and therefore the proposed development, being visible from the street.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — Appeal Decision As such, the proposed development would not only be visible from the front elevations of Nos 25, 26, 27 and 28, and the rears of a number of properties situated to the rear of the appeal site, but also from public vantage points to the front of the appeal site, including Fernwood Avenue and Bridgewater Road (A4005), especially when viewed from the south. 9. In view of the above, the proposal would have a harmful effect upon the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area. The appeal scheme is contrary to the objectives of Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022) which seeks to ensure, amongst other things, that all development proposals are of a scale and design that provides high levels of external amenity and complements the locality. 10. The proposal would also be contrary to the guidance relating to dormers contained within the SPD, as well as paragraph 134 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that development that is not well designed should be refused. Conclusion 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — Appeal Decision The proposal therefore conflicts with the development plan when taken as a whole and there are no material considerations that indicate a decision should be taken otherwise than in accordance with the development plan. Accordingly, for the reasons set out above, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 R Major

24 Fernwood Avenue, WEMBLEY, HA0 2HF — London Borough of Brent — R Major INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The proposed large rear dormer would unbalance the existing and distinct symmetry enjoyed with the adjoining property, as well as the other properties in this row.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The appearance of the dormer, with its flat roof design and being set up to the ridge height of the main dwelling, results in a bulky and incongruous form of development that is detrimental to the appearance of the host property, the adjoining property, and street scene in general.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The setting of the dormer up to the existing ridge height of the main dwelling also runs contrary to the advice contained within the Council’s ‘Residential Extensions and Alterations’ Supplementary Planning Document 2 (2018) (SPD) which states that rear dormers should be set down from the ridge by at least 0.3m.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶9

In view of the above, the proposal would have a harmful effect upon the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶10

The proposal would also be contrary to the guidance relating to dormers contained within the SPD, as well as paragraph 134 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that development that is not well designed should be refused.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022)
Determinative
Paragraph 134 of the National Planning Policy Framework
Determinative
The Council’s ‘Residential Extensions and Alterations’ Supplementary Planning Document 2 (2018) (SPD)
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 December 2023 under the Open Government Licence.