Case 3321317

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG

East Suffolk — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
11 December 2023
Authority
East Suffolk
Inspector
Price J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
Peter Mitchell
LPA reference
DC/23/0767/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000244
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
17 October 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the potential harm to the South Lowestoft Conservation Area, as the development does not meet the high standard of design and materials required to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 30 November 2023 by Jonathan Price BA(Hons) DipTP MRTPI DMS an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11th December 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/X3540/W/23/3321317 St George’s House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0QG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Peter Mitchell against the decision of East Suffolk Council. • The application Ref DC/23/0767/FUL, dated 22 February 2023, was refused by notice dated 25 April 2023. • The development proposed is change from French doors to bi-fold doors. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The work to replace the earlier, non-original French door with bi-fold doors has already been carried out. Main Issues 3. Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the South Lowestoft Conservation Area (CA), considering also its effect on the host property as a non-designated heritage asset. Reasons 4. The works relate to a lounge opening on the third floor of a four-storey semi- detached property containing residential apartments.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision This is on the elevation facing the sea front Esplanade. Although at the rear of St George’s House, this elevation is in a publicly prominent position, readily visible to passers-by. 5. According to its published Appraisal1, the wider CA is significant for its distinctive developed character and appearance as a mid-nineteenth century seaside pleasure resort. This was evidently a formally planned part of town, with central roads and grid like streets radiating out to afford views towards the sea. Green and open spaces were designed into the townscape and contribute to its strong sense of grandeur. The town’s maritime connections are discernible through building orientations, building types, statues, and spaces such as the promenades and piers. These provide focal points within the CA and contribute to its special interest. 6. St George’s House comprises one of the large buildings which give this area a sense of grandeur and historic interest. The Appraisal describes this large, late 1 South Lowestoft/Kirkley Conservation Area Appraisal – East Suffolk Council, January 2022. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X3540/W/23/3321317 nineteenth century house as being of notable architectural interest, with fine detailing which makes a positive contribution in this prominent seafront location. It also notes its historic interest, as a high-quality example and representation of the pattern of building in South Lowestoft at this time. 7. The bi-fold doors open onto a small balcony set behind the low parapet on top of the bay window situated below. The original fenestration has been lost throughout the rear elevation of this semi-detached building. However, other than in the case of this present development, the original openings and surrounding detailing remain largely intact. In this case, the window has clearly been expanded either side of the brick arch defining its original width, with the consequential removal of the original brick detailing that once defined each of its sides. 8. The widening of this window and the introduction of contemporary bi-fold doors has disrupted the balanced proportions to the openings on this elevation and eroded some of its original architectural character and detailing.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision The works have therefore not amounted to the particularly high standard of design and materials necessary to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the CA. The development for which permission is sought therefore conflicts with Waveney Local Plan2 (WLP) Policy WLP 8.39, concerning development within conservation areas. Through the CA Appraisal the building is identified as a non-designated heritage asset. The failure to conserve or enhance its character and appearance as such conflicts further with Policy WLP 8.37. 9. In determining this appeal, I have a duty under section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the CA. Paragraph 199 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires that when considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation. This is irrespective of whether any potential harm amounts to substantial harm, total loss or less than substantial harm to its significance. 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision The proposal involves less than substantial harm to the significance of the CA. However, applying NPPF paragraph 202, this harm would not be outweighed by any discernible public benefits deriving from the proposal. There would be moderate harm to the significance of the building as a non-designated heritage asset which, under NPPF paragraph 203, also weighs negatively in the balance. Conclusion 11. There are no countervailing grounds to support this proposal, in the light of the heritage harm discussed above. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Jonathan Price

St Georges House, Apartment 4, The Esplanade, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0QG — East Suffolk — Jonathan Price INSPECTOR 2 East Suffolk Council – Waveney Local Plan covering the former Waveney Local Planning Authority area. Adopted 20 March 2019. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶8

The replacement of French doors with bi-fold doors has disrupted the balanced proportions and eroded some of the original architectural character and detailing.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶9

The development conflicts with Waveney Local Plan Policy WLP 8.39 and the National Planning Policy Framework's requirement to give great weight to the conservation of designated heritage assets.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
WLP 8.39
Determinative
NPPF 199
Substantial
NPPF 202
Substantial
NPPF 203
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 11 December 2023 under the Open Government Licence.