Case 3321229

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA

Bracknell Forest Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
27 October 2023
Authority
Bracknell Forest Borough Council
Inspector
Russell M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Major dwellings
Appellant
Nicholas King Homes
LPA reference
22/00116/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000036
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 June 2023

Summary AI

The costs application was refused as the Council's behaviour was not deemed unreasonable. The Inspector found that the Council's decision was not influenced by the emerging Local Plan, which had not progressed towards adoption. The appeal was dismissed.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 10 October 2023 by M Russell BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27 October 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/R0335/W/23/3321229 Westwood House, Swinley Road, Ascot SL5 8BA Easting (x) 489926 Northing (y) 168826 • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Nicholas King Homes for a full award of costs against Bracknell Forest Borough Council. • The appeal was against a refusal to grant planning permission for development described as ‘residential development comprising the demolition of two existing dwellings and the erection of 20 new dwellings with associated parking, landscaping and access works’. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision The PPG provides that local planning authorities are at risk of an award of costs if they behave unreasonably with respect to the substance of the matter under appeal, for example, by unreasonably refusing planning applications, or by unreasonably defending appeals. Examples of this include where development is prevented or delayed where it should clearly have been permitted having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and any other material considerations; where vague, generalised or inaccurate assertions are made about a proposal’s impact which are unsupported by any objective analysis and where similar cases are not determined in a consistent manner. 4. There is agreement between the parties that the site constitutes previously developed land. The neighbouring site known as Brompton Gardens was previously granted planning permission for residential development also at a time when the Council could not demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing land. Even so, it does not automatically follow that planning permission should be granted on the appeal site. 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision The Council was required to consider the proposal on the basis of the current situation, having regard to existing development in the area, the design of the proposal and the site-specific location of the site with boundaries to both London Road and Swinley Road. Furthermore, the Council would have been mindful of the previous appeal decision on the site. Therefore, the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision The Council was required to consider the proposal on the basis of the current situation, having regard to existing development in the area, the design of the proposal and the site-specific location of the site with boundaries to both London Road and Swinley Road. Furthermore, the Council would have been mindful of the previous appeal decision on the site. Therefore, the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/R0335/W/23/3321229 material considerations were not identical to the neighbouring site. While I have reached a different conclusion to the Council on the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, the Council was entitled to reach its own conclusions on what is a subjective matter. 6. Whilst informal advice was during the consideration of the application and it was confirmed that design changes made were an improvement to the proposed scheme, ultimately the processes of the Council required final sign off taking all material considerations into account and the Council set out its reasoning within its delegated report. The report also acknowledged that the Council was unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply and a tilted balance was applied in line with Paragraph 11d of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). In these particular respects, the Council did not act unreasonably. 7. However, while the Framework allows Local Planning Authorities to give weight to relevant policies in emerging plans, the Council did not rely on any specific emerging policies in its decision.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision Rather it suggested that the emerging Local Plan (eLP) demonstrated it was moving towards being able to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply. As it stands, the evidence before me suggests that the main modifications have not been completed or consulted upon and the eLP has therefore progressed no further towards adoption since the Council’s decision. I therefore find that the Council’s reliance on the eLP addressing the housing land supply shortage was premature. 8. The appellant considers some of the Council’s arguments to be contradictory. Whether or not that be the case, the Council reached an overall finding that there would be significant and demonstrable harms arising from the spread of the development, the impact on the character of the site and erosion of the areas function as a gap between the nearest settlements. It also found that the contribution of 18 dwellings over the existing situation, including 5 affordable dwellings, carried significant weight. With these factors in mind, it is not clear that the Council’s balancing exercise would have concluded in favour of the development and that an appeal would have been avoided had the eLP not formed part of its considerations on housing land supply. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Costs Decision

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — Costs Decision For the reasons set out, unreasonable behaviour which has caused unnecessary expense has not clearly been demonstrated in this instance. The application for costs is therefore refused.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 M Russell

Land at Westwood House , Swinley Road, Ascot, Berkshire , SL5 8BA — Bracknell Forest Borough Council — M Russell INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7

The Council did not rely on any specific emerging policies in its decision and suggested that the emerging Local Plan demonstrated it was moving towards being able to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, but the evidence before the Inspector suggests that the main modifications have not been completed or consulted upon.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The Council's overall finding was that there would be significant and demonstrable harms arising from the spread of the development, the impact on the character of the site and erosion of the areas function as a gap between the nearest settlements, and that the contribution of 18 dwellings over the existing situation, including 5 affordable dwellings, carried significant weight.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Paragraph 11d of the National Planning Policy Framework
Determinative
Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5)
Unclear

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 27 October 2023 under the Open Government Licence.