10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB
London Borough of Barnet — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Inspector
- Clark L
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Mr Haim Ben Arzi
- LPA reference
- 22/2859/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E09000003
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 8 August 2023
Summary AI
The applicant's application for an award of costs against the council was refused. The inspector found that the council's justification for refusing planning permission was sufficient and that the applicant had not demonstrated unreasonable behaviour.
PDF text
10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB — London Borough of Barnet — Costs Decision Site visit made on 31 October 2023 by L Clark BA(HONS) DIPTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 4th January 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/W/23/3320015 10 Wentworth Avenue, Finchley, Barney, London N3 1YB • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Haim Ben Arzi for a full award of costs against the Council of the London Borough of Barnet. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for conversion of existing property into 4no. self-contained flats including a part single, part two storey side and rear extension plus creation of basement with lightwells at rear. Roof extension including rear dormer window, 2no. side and 1no. front facing rooflights. Associated amenity space, refuse and cycle storage and provision of 3no. off-street parking spaces following demolition of the existing garage. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses.
10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB — London Borough of Barnet — Costs Decision However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The applicant contends that the Council has acted unreasonably in its failing to provide justification or evidence to support its reason for refusal, thus preventing development which should have been permitted resulting in the applicant incurring the necessary or wasted expense of an appeal. 4. Whilst I have found the appeal proposal to be acceptable, that finding was based on the evidence presented by the Council, the policies of the development plan and National Planning Policy Framework, and my own observations on site. 5. The applicant has referred to the fact the Planning Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation of Planning Officer’s, whose Report to Committee set out a justification for granting planning permission. Council Members are not bound to accept the advice or recommendation given by Planning Officers. Similarly, it is not uncommon for Planning Committee to come to a differing view when applying their own judgement. 6.
10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB — London Borough of Barnet — Costs Decision Moreover, the Minutes of the meeting confirm that Officers had advised Council Members, with two parties speaking against the application and the Agent addressing Committee in favour. Whilst I accept that the Minutes are brief and do not fully explain the justification pertaining to the refusal, I am satisfied that the Council provided justification for its decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB — London Borough of Barnet — Costs Decision Moreover, the Minutes of the meeting confirm that Officers had advised Council Members, with two parties speaking against the application and the Agent addressing Committee in favour. Whilst I accept that the Minutes are brief and do not fully explain the justification pertaining to the refusal, I am satisfied that the Council provided justification for its decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/23/3320015 7. The applicant contends that the Council’s justification was brief, however the decision was justified by reference to the development plan and sufficient explanation was provided to enable me to understand the Committee’s reason for refusing planning permission. 8. I conclude that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not been demonstrated. As such, an award of costs is not justified. The application for an award of costs is therefore refused.
10 Wentworth Avenue, LONDON, N3 1YB — London Borough of Barnet — L Clark INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations For appellant ¶3
The applicant claims that the council acted unreasonably in failing to provide justification or evidence to support its reason for refusal, leading to unnecessary expense.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶5
The inspector notes that council members are not bound to accept the advice of planning officers and that it is common for planning committee to come to a differing view.
Planning obligations For appellant ¶7
The applicant argues that the council's justification was brief, but the inspector finds that sufficient explanation was provided to understand the committee's reason for refusing planning permission.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶8
The inspector concludes that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not been demonstrated, justifying the refusal of an award of costs.
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 January 2024 under the Open Government Licence.