7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG
Ipswich Borough Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Authority
- Ipswich Borough Council
- Inspector
- Reed D
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Change of use
- Appellant
- Luxury Leisure
- LPA reference
- IP/22/00704/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000202
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 13 September 2023
Summary AI
The appeal was allowed due to the inspector's conclusion that the adult gaming centre would have a positive effect on the vitality and viability of the Central Shopping Area, despite exceeding the threshold for non-Class E uses. The inspector accepted that the use was beneficial and outweighed the policy requirements.
PDF text
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 16 October 2023 by David Reed BSc DipTP DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date:08.11.2023 Appeal Ref: APP/R3515/W/23/3319465 7 Upper Brook Street, Ipswich IP4 1EG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Luxury Leisure against the decision of Ipswich Borough Council. • The application Ref IP/22/00704/FUL, dated 5 August 2022, was refused by notice dated 15 December 2022. • The development proposed is the change of use of the ground floor from a retail unit (Class E) to an adult gaming centre (Sui Generis) and first floor to storage and staff area with external alterations and associated works. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and permission is granted for the change of use of the ground floor from a retail unit (Class E) to an adult gaming centre (Sui Generis) and first floor to storage and staff area with external alterations and associated works at 7 Upper Brook Street, Ipswich IP4 1EG, in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref IP/22/00704/FUL, dated 5 August 2022, subject to the attached schedule of conditions. Main Issue 2.
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the Central Shopping Area. Reasons 3. The proposal is for the change of use of a vacant Class E retail unit, previously Hughes electrical store, to an adult gaming centre (AGC), a sui generis use. The premises lie on the eastern side of Upper Brook Street near the junction with Carr Street, part of the retail and commercial heart of the town. 4. The site lies within the IP-One Area, Town Centre Boundary and Central Shopping Area as defined by the Ipswich Local Plan 2022 where Policies CS14 and DM27 seek to promote high quality investment to strengthen its regional role and support the town’s vitality and viability by promoting appropriate development. To this end Policy DM27 divides the Central Shopping Area into Primary, Secondary and Specialist Shopping Zones where different policies apply. Upper Brook Street with Carr Street and parts of Dogs Head Street and Tacket Street lie in a secondary zone to the east of the primary zone which is centred around Tavern Street, Westgate Street and Buttermarket. 5.
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision Policy DM27 specifies that within the primary shopping zone all uses are required to be primary commercial, business and service uses but within the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision Policy DM27 specifies that within the primary shopping zone all uses are required to be primary commercial, business and service uses but within the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R3515/W/23/3319465 secondary shopping zone ‘public houses, drinking establishments, takeaways, betting shops, payday loan shops and other main town centre uses’ are permitted provided they do not exceed 15% of the units within the zone. An AGC, whilst not specifically listed as a main town centre use in the National Planning Policy Framework, is a leisure use that attracts visitor footfall and would be appropriate in the town centre if other policy requirements are met. In addition to the overall 15% limit on non-Class E uses, proposals must not lead to more than three non-Class E uses in a row nor adjacent premises being within the same use class. These circumstances would not arise in this case. 6. The heart of the Council’s case is that the latest 2022 survey1 shows that of 229 units in the secondary shopping zone, 48 or 21% are in non-Class E uses. Of the 211 occupied units, 43 or 19% are in non-Class E uses. The 15% threshold is therefore exceeded. However, the policy accepts proposals that would exceed the threshold when they would be beneficial to the vitality and viability of the shopping zone, including uses ‘that help to attract people to visit the town centre during the evening’.
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision An AGC is such a use. 7. The Council argue that the benefit of the use is not ‘robustly demonstrated’, a subjective point. However, the unit has been vacant for nearly two years since December 2021. Francis Darrah, Chartered Surveyors with extensive experience of the letting and sale of retail property in Ipswich town centre, note demand for retail space has been declining for some years, there are a significant number of vacant premises in both primary and secondary zones and conversion to residential is the only potential future use in some cases2. Their conclusion is that there would be little, if any demand from retail or café type occupiers to use No 7 Upper Brook Street and the building may remain empty for a prolonged period, adding to the overall vacancy rate. 8. AGC uses do provide active frontages with a survey of Admiral customers elsewhere showing that about 50% make linked trips to other town centre premises. Whilst there are three existing AGCs in the area, these are over 90 metres away, so no undue concentration would result, and the planning system has no remit to limit competition. 9.
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision The Council’s 2022 survey notes that the town centre is undergoing change with a sharp increase in vacancies since 2017, particularly in the primary shopping zone where further Class E demand should presumably be focussed. Whilst the secondary shopping zone has been more resilient in relation to occupancy, this reflects its diversification with more non-retail uses, some within Class E such as cafes and restaurants but many sui-generis and some Class C1 uses. The proposal would continue this diversification trend. Conclusion 10. For these reasons the proposal would have a positive effect on the vitality and viability of the Central Shopping Area and should be permitted. Whilst the AGC would conflict with the percentage limit for non-Class E uses in the secondary shopping zone set out in Policy DM27 this is outweighed by the other material considerations that favour the proposal in this case. 11. Although the site falls within the IP-One Opportunity Area C, the associated Policy SP20 primarily relates to the ‘development opportunities’ within the area 1 Central Shopping Area – Identified Frontages Survey Report January 2023 2 Letter dated 27 March 2023 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/R3515/W/23/3319465 rather than the use of the established peripheral street frontages. The policy is therefore of marginal relevance in determining the appeal. 12. The Council suggested four conditions should the appeal be allowed. These are accepted by the appellant3 and meet the relevant tests. In addition to the standard implementation time limit it is necessary to define the approved drawings in the interests of certainty. Conditions are also needed to control the hours of opening and to secure any necessary noise mitigation measures to protect the amenity of nearby residents. 13. Having regard to the above the appeal should be allowed.
7 Upper Brook Street, IPSWICH, IP4 1EG — Ipswich Borough Council — David Reed INSPECTOR Schedule of conditions 1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings 3479(c)1 dated 07/07/2022. 3) The premises shall only be open for customers between the hours of 0700 to 0000 hours daily. 4) Prior to first occupation, details of noise levels and any proposed noise mitigation from gaming machines shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority and any required mitigation shall be installed prior to the first use of the adult gaming centre. 3 Including the restriction on opening hours included in the Council’s case and list of conditions and not disputed in the appellant’s final comments. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact For appellant ¶10
The inspector concluded that the proposal would have a positive effect on the vitality and viability of the Central Shopping Area and outweighed the policy requirements.
Living conditions For appellant ¶8
The inspector noted that AGC uses provide active frontages and that about 50% of Admiral customers make linked trips to other town centre premises.
Housing land supply For appellant ¶6
The inspector accepted that the proposal would continue the diversification trend in the secondary shopping zone and would not lead to more than three non-Class E uses in a row.
Flood risk Neutral ¶null
Not mentioned in the decision letter.
Ecology and biodiversity Neutral ¶null
Not mentioned in the decision letter.
Parking Neutral ¶null
Not mentioned in the decision letter.
Heritage impact For appellant ¶11
The inspector noted that the site falls within the IP-One Opportunity Area C, but the associated policy is of marginal relevance in determining the appeal.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Local Plan D1 DM27 |
Moderate |
| NPPF 208 |
Unclear |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 November 2023 under the Open Government Licence.