Case 3317177

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG

Eastbourne Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
21 February 2024
Authority
Eastbourne Borough Council
Inspector
Hobbs J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Major dwellings
Appellant
N Living Limited
LPA reference
210537
ONS LPA code
E07000061
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
12 June 2023

Summary AI

The applicant's costs application was successful due to the Council's unreasonable behavior. The Council failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its refusal of planning permission, leading to unnecessary expense for the applicant.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG — Eastbourne Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 8 November 2023 by J Hobbs MRTPI MCD BSc (hons) an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 February 2024 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/T1410/W/23/3317177 St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, Eastbourne BN21 4NG • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Mark Overy N Living Limited for a full award of costs against Eastbourne Borough Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the redevelopment of existing site to create 17 houses with cycle parking and car parking. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG — Eastbourne Borough Council — Costs Decision The applicant submits that the Council acted unreasonably in so far as it has failed to substantiate its reasons for refusal, prevented a development which should clearly be permitted, and failed to adhere to deadlines. 4. The only evidence provided to support the reasons for refusal were consultee responses to the planning application and the decision notice. As a minimum, I would expect a brief report detailing the Council’s reasoning, outlining why it considers the proposal does not conform with the development plan, taking account of material considerations. Moreover, the Council has not refused the development for all the reasons sets out within the consultee responses, and there is no evidence before me explaining their decision making. For these reasons I consider that the Council has failed to substantiate its reasons for refusal. 5. Without an explanation on how the decision was made, it is unclear how the Council came to a different decision to myself. As there is no detailed evidence on why the Council chose to refuse the application and I have determined that the appeal should be allowed, I conclude that the Council’s actions has prevented a development which should have been permitted. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG — Eastbourne Borough Council — Costs Decision Given the Council has not sought to provide additional evidence, I do not conclude that they have failed to adhere to the deadlines of the appeal. 7. Overall, I consider that the Council has acted unreasonably resulting in the applicant incurring an unnecessary expense. Therefore, a full award of costs is warranted. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG — Eastbourne Borough Council — Costs Decision Given the Council has not sought to provide additional evidence, I do not conclude that they have failed to adhere to the deadlines of the appeal. 7. Overall, I consider that the Council has acted unreasonably resulting in the applicant incurring an unnecessary expense. Therefore, a full award of costs is warranted. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/T1410/W/23/3317177 Costs Order 8. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Eastbourne Borough Council shall pay to Mr Mark Overy of N Living Limited, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision; such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. 9. The applicant is now invited to submit to Eastbourne Borough Council, to who a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 J Hobbs

St Andrews Church, Blackwater Road, EASTBOURNE, BN21 4NG — Eastbourne Borough Council — J Hobbs INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶4

The Council failed to provide a brief report detailing its reasoning for refusing the development, and did not explain how it came to a different decision from the Inspector.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

The Council's actions prevented a development that should have been permitted, as it was unclear how the Council came to a different decision from the Inspector.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 February 2024 under the Open Government Licence.