Case 3317002

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA

Melton Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
20 September 2023
Authority
Melton Borough Council
Inspector
Pearce S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Richard Ogleby
LPA reference
21/00836/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000133
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
31 May 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the development site being outside the built-up area of Kirby Bellars and not meeting the criteria for development in rural areas. The proposal conflicted with the development plan policies and the Framework. The benefits of the scheme were limited, and the harm resulting from the development outweighed the benefits.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 25 July 2023 by S Pearce BA(Hons) MPlan MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20 September 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/Y2430/W/23/3317002 Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray LE14 2DU • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Richard Ogleby against the decision of Melton Borough Council. • The application Ref 21/00836/FUL, dated 9 July 2021, was refused by notice dated 26 October 2022. • The development proposed is described as a “full planning application for the re-siting of 3 approved dwellings (17/01312/FUL) and the delivery of an additional 3 bedroom dwelling”. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the development having regard to the development plan. Reasons 3. The development strategy for the Borough is contained within Policy SS2 of the Melton Borough Local Plan 2018 (LP).

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision The strategy establishes a settlement hierarchy, which identifies Melton Mowbray Main Urban Area as the priority location for growth, to accommodate approximately 65% of the Borough’s housing Need. Service Centres and Rural Hubs will accommodate the remaining housing development on a proportionate basis. 4. Within the LP, Kirby Bellars is classed as a Rural Settlement, which is a classification that covers small villages and hamlets in the Borough. The supporting text to LP Policy SS2 describes such settlements as small villages or hamlets that have little or no local services and where residents are entirely dependent upon travelling to a nearby settlement or town or city for work, recreation and service provision. 5. To help address a proportion of the Borough’s housing need, windfall sites are supported by the LP in and adjacent to Service Centres, Rural Hubs and Rural Settlements subject to the criteria contained within policy SS3. Outside of these settlements lies the open countryside where new development is strictly controlled. 6. There is no defined settlement boundary around Kirby Bellars.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Development along Main Street towards Station Lane and beyond, including dwellings and the Flying Childers public house becomes more sporadic, providing a transition between the built-up area of Kirby Bellars and the open countryside. The https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Development along Main Street towards Station Lane and beyond, including dwellings and the Flying Childers public house becomes more sporadic, providing a transition between the built-up area of Kirby Bellars and the open countryside. The https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Y2430/W/23/3317002 appeal site is separated from the settlement of Kirby Bellars by 36 Main Street and a grassed field. The field provides a significant open break and as a result, the appeal site therefore lies outside of the built settlement, within the countryside. 7. Paragraph 79 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) states that to promote sustainable development in rural areas, housing should be located where it will enhance or maintain the vitality of rural communities. Paragraph 80 of the Framework supports the provision of isolated homes in the countryside against a closed list of exceptions. However, the appeal site lies a short distance from Kirby Bellars. It is accessible on foot along a relatively wide footpath, which is served by street lighting. Furthermore, there are bus stops serving a high frequency bus service within close proximity, which would provide future occupants an alternative form of travel other than the private car. Therefore, the appeal site is not isolated in the context of paragraph 80 of the Framework. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision LP Policy SS3 states, amongst other things, that planning permission will be granted for new residential development in the rural area within or on the edge of existing settlements, provided it is in keeping with the scale and character of the host settlement and subject certain criteria. There is disagreement between the two parties in respect of criteria 1 and 3 of LP Policy SS3. 9. Criteria 1 of LP Policy SS3 requires, among other things, the development provides housing which meets a proven local need, as identified by substantive evidence. The Council state that that there is no identified shortfall of self-build plots within the either the ward in which the site lies or the wider Borough. I understand that there is a demonstrable local need for self-build accommodation within Kirby Bellars, however no substantive evidence has been submitted which identifies the extent of this need. The proposal is therefore contrary to criteria 1 of LP Policy SS3. 10. Criteria 3 of LP Policy SS3 requires, amongst other things, the development to be served by sustainable infrastructure, or provide new infrastructure or services to the wider benefit of the settlement.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision A new footway linking the site with Station Lane is proposed, although this reflects that approved under the previous planning permission ref: 17/1312/FUL on the site and would benefit future occupants of the development only. Notwithstanding there was no specific request from the Council, no new infrastructure or services to benefit the wider community are proposed. The proposal is therefore contrary to criteria 4 of LP Policy SS3. 11. Although I have found the dwelling would not be isolated in the context of paragraph 80 of the Framework, this does not mean that one additional new market dwelling which would be detached from the settlement edge of Kirby Bellars and in the countryside would be necessary or appropriate. 12. For the reasons outlined above, I conclude that the appeal site is not in a suitable location for the development having regard to the development plan. As a result, the proposed development would conflict with LP Policies SS2 and SS3, as set out above. It would also conflict with the Framework, which seeks to promote sustainable development in rural areas. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Y2430/W/23/3317002 Other matters 13. LP Policy C8 states, amongst other things, that in locations within or adjacent to the built form of settlements and those in keeping with the surrounding area, self-build proposals for community schemes will be particularly supported. As established above, the appeal site is not adjacent to the settlement of Kirby Bellars, due to the intervening field. 14. Notwithstanding this, the proposed development is a self-build project and would allow the appellant’s family to build their own homes in Kirby Bellars, thereby maintaining existing family and professional connections. I understand that there are no suitable plots beyond the appellant’s own land available for self-build in Kirby Bellars. Although the appeal site is locationally closer to Kirby Bellars, that Frisby on the Wreake, the ward in which it is sited, I understand that there is no identified shortfall of self-build plots within the wider Borough. No substantive evidence has been provided to demonstrate otherwise. Notwithstanding this, the provision of four dwellings as a self-build project would be a benefit of the scheme, which is afforded moderate weight. 15.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision Planning permission (ref: 17/01312/FUL) has previously been granted for three dwellings at the appeal site and is extant. Given the previous planning permission on the site has been implemented there is a real prospect that the fallback position would be implemented. However, I understand the primary justification for allowing the extant permission related to exceptional circumstances surrounding the cessation of a neighbouring use. While noting this previous permission is a realistic fallback, the proposed development is of a different scale and form to the previously approved scheme. The neighbouring use has since ceased and is no longer a consideration that can be weighed in favour of the appeal proposal, which seeks to provide a net gain of one additional dwelling. I therefore accord this matter moderate weight in making this decision. Planning Balance and Conclusion 16. Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states that the determination of applications should be made in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — Appeal Decision In this case, the provision of four dwellings, resulting in a net gain of one dwelling when considered against planning permission ref: 17/01312/FUL, in this location, outside any named settlement, would be contrary to LP Policies SS2 and SS3. 17. The benefits of the scheme are limited, having regard to the modest amount of development proposed, and not sufficient therefore to overcome the harm identified. Overall, the harm resulting from the development and the conflict with the development plan policies outweigh the benefits. The proposal would fail to accord with the development plan taken as a whole and the other material considerations do not suggest the decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan. 18. Therefore, for the reasons given above, and taking account of all other considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 S Pearce

Land adjacent to 36 Main Road, Kirby Bellars, Melton Mowbray, LE14 2EA — Melton Borough Council — S Pearce INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶6

The appeal site lies outside the built-up area of Kirby Bellars, within the countryside.

Green belt
Against appellant
¶7

The appeal site is not isolated in the context of paragraph 80 of the Framework, as it is accessible on foot and has bus stops nearby.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The development does not meet the criteria for development in rural areas, as stated in LP Policy SS3.

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶9

There is no identified shortfall of self-build plots in the wider Borough, and no substantive evidence has been submitted to demonstrate otherwise.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶10

No new infrastructure or services to benefit the wider community are proposed.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶10

The proposal does not meet the criteria for development in rural areas, as stated in LP Policy SS3.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶11

One additional new market dwelling would not be necessary or appropriate in this location.

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶13

LP Policy C8 supports self-build proposals for community schemes in locations within or adjacent to the built form of settlements, but the appeal site is not adjacent to the settlement of Kirby Bellars.

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶14

Although the appeal site is closer to Kirby Bellars, there is no identified shortfall of self-build plots in the wider Borough, and no substantive evidence has been submitted to demonstrate otherwise.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶15

The proposed development is of a different scale and form to the previously approved scheme, and there is no new infrastructure or services proposed to benefit the wider community.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
LP Policy SS2
Determinative
LP Policy SS3
Determinative
LP Policy C8
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 September 2023 under the Open Government Licence.