Case 3316514

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ

Stratford-on-Avon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
29 June 2023
Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Inspector
Cooper W
Procedure
Hearing
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Major offices/R&D/light industry
Appellant
Valefresco Ltd
LPA reference
21/02292/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000221
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
10 March 2023

Summary AI

The application for costs was refused due to the council's late introduction of new evidence, which did not cause unnecessary expense for the appellant. The inspector found that the council's actions did not fundamentally alter the core arguments in the case and that the appellant would have proceeded with the hearing note regardless.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision Hearing (Virtual) held on 16 May 2023 Site visit made on 17 May 2023 by William Cooper BA (Hons) MA CMLI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 29 June 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/J3720/W/23/3316514 Old Pastures Farm, Stratford Road, Hampton Lucy, Warwick CV35 8BQ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr N Mauro, Valefresco for an award of costs against Stratford-on-Avon District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the erection of 119,682sqm of horticultural polytunnels for protected cropping of salad and Chinese vegetables; installation of an attenuation basin for the collection of surface water run- off and associated irrigation purposes; and all associated landscaping works. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may only be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary expense in the appeal process. 3. The application centres on the applicant’s claim that the Council introduced fresh and substantial evidence at a late stage, necessitating extra expense for preparatory work that would not otherwise have arisen. 4. PPG indicates that local planning authorities will be at risk of an award being made against them if they introduced fresh and substantial evidence at a late stage, necessitating extra expense for preparatory work that would not otherwise have arisen. 5. The document Report on the Scrutiny of Landscape Statements & Evidence submitted by Appellant: Landscape Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) & Statement of Case (Landscape Matters Only) (the RSL) by the Council’s landscape consultant was appended by the Council to their Appeal Statement. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision In reviewing the appellant’s landscape evidence, the RSL provides some additional commentary that mainly amounts to the following: a) a review of methodological aspects of, and Viewpoint observations in, the LVIA that was submitted by the appellant; and b) expansion on harms with a landscape dimension that were described in the Council’s reasons for refusal and associated Delegated Report. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision In reviewing the appellant’s landscape evidence, the RSL provides some additional commentary that mainly amounts to the following: a) a review of methodological aspects of, and Viewpoint observations in, the LVIA that was submitted by the appellant; and b) expansion on harms with a landscape dimension that were described in the Council’s reasons for refusal and associated Delegated Report. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/J3720/W/23/3316514 7. Also, in conjunction with commentary on the asserted harm to the Avon Valley Terrace farmlands landscape sub-type, which is at the core of the Council’s second reason for refusal and analysis of that main issue in the Delegated Report, the RSL adds comment in various paragraphs about asserted adverse impact on an adjoining Riverside meadowlands landscape sub-type within the Avon Valley. 8. The bulk of the RSL amounted overall to amplification of the core concerns that had already been articulated by the Council. However, I find that unreasonable behaviour by the Council did occur, at this later stage of the appeal process, as follows. The Council submitted, and referred in their Appeal Statement to, the above commentary in the RSL which asserts adverse impact on a landscape sub-type in the Avon Valley that is additional to that specified in the second reason for refusal. In so crossing the line from amplification to addition of argument, at this later stage in the appeal process, this was unreasonable. 9. However, that said, the RSL mainly amplified the core concerns that had been articulated by the Council earlier in their reasons for refusal and Delegated Report.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision Thus, the Council’s Appeal Statement and appended RSL did not fundamentally alter the core arguments in this case. 10. As such, and notwithstanding that the appellant chose to table an additional Landscape and Visual Matters Hearing Note (LHN) at the hearing, which included approximately two and a half page section of response to the RSL, I find as follows. 11. It is not clear that had the Council refrained from expanding on its landscape character concerns, the core appeal arguments would have been substantially different in scope. Furthermore, it is not clear that the appellant would have chosen not to table, along with their other hearing note on heritage, a LHN, even without the Council’s later assertions about the adjoing Riverside meadowlands landscape sub-type. And, on the evidence before me, I am not convinced that a discretely identifiable additional expense was incurred, over and above that of the preparations for the hearing that the appellant and their consultants would have undertaken anyway. Conclusion 12. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has not been demonstrated.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Costs Decision

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — Costs Decision Accordingly, the application for costs fails.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 William Cooper

Old Pastures Farm, Hampton Lucy, WARWICK, CV35 8BQ — Stratford-on-Avon District Council — William Cooper INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶8

The council submitted additional commentary in the RSL, which asserted adverse impact on a landscape sub-type in the Avon Valley, but this was not unreasonable as it mainly amplified core concerns already articulated by the council.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶11

It was not clear that the core appeal arguments would have been substantially different in scope had the council refrained from expanding on its landscape character concerns.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Planning Practice Guidance
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 29 June 2023 under the Open Government Licence.