Case 3315061

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
15 March 2024
Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Inspector
Senior H
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Airspace UK Ltd
LPA reference
PP/22/00040
ONS LPA code
E09000020
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
12 June 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed for a change of use of a basement from retail storage to residential use, with planning permission granted subject to conditions. The inspector was satisfied that the proposal would not harm the character and function of the Notting Hill District Shopping Centre, and that the development would be car-free. The proposal also preserved the character and appearance of the Kensington Conservation Area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 15 August 2023 by H Senior BA (Hons) MCD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 15th March 2024 Appeal Ref: APP/K5600/W/23/3315061 Basement, 4A Campden Street, London W8 7EP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Kevin O’Callaghan (Airspace UK Ltd) against the decision of the Council of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. • The application Ref PP/22/00040, dated 22 December 2021, was refused by notice dated 17 November 2022. • The development proposed is change of use of basement from retail storage (Class E) to residential (Class C3) to provide a one-bed self contained flat with home office/workspace accommodation. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for change of use of basement from retail storage (Class E) to residential (Class C3) to provide a one-bed self contained flat with home office/workspace accommodation. at Basement, London, W8 7EP in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref PP/22/00040, dated 22 December 2021, subject to the conditions set out in the attached schedule. Application for costs 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision An application for costs was made by Airspace UK Ltd against the decision of the Council of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. This application is the subject of a separate decision. Preliminary Matters 3. Since the planning application was submitted an article 4 direction became effective restricting the change of use from uses within Class E to Class C3. Whilst I have had regard to this it has not been determinative as the proposal before me is a planning application and not an application for prior approval. 4. There has recently been a revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) published by Government. Those parts of the Framework most relevant to this appeal have not been amended. As a result, I consider that there is no requirement for me to seek further submissions on the revised Framework, and I am satisfied that no party’s interests have been prejudiced by my taking this approach. Main Issues 5. The main issues are the effect of the proposal on: • the character and function of the Notting Hill District Shopping Centre, and https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K5600/W/23/3315061 • the residents parking provision in the area. Reasons Retail storage space 6. The host building is located in the secondary shopping area of Notting Hill. The change of use relates to an area of approximately 29 square metres of retail storage space that was retained as part of a previous application to convert the basement of a 4 Campden Street to a one bedroom flat (PP/20/00083). The proposal before me seeks to change to use this area to residential use as part of the approved flat. 7. Whilst the Council is concerned about the period of time and the evidence for marketing, the policy CF3 of the Local Plan (2019) requires that it is successfully demonstrated that the loss of below ground floor shop uses would not adversely affect the essential shopping character, function or vitality of the centre. It does not require a specific period for marketing or for evidence that the storage area was marketed to other nearly commercial units. 8. The appellant has submitted evidence that both the previous and prospective tenant of the retail shop do not require the additional basement storage and indicates that the storage would not be likely to be required by future users.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision Due to the change in layout to facilitate the approved scheme, access to the basement storage area would be external to the retail premises. It would be likely therefore that it would remain as a vacant space. In addition, the change of use of the storage area would not harm the retail presence within the street scene due in part to the lack of street frontage. 9. Access to the basement storage would be via the access to the residential unit and would share the same stairway. Whilst I accept that the changes to the access to the storage space have been brought about by the change of use of the basement to residential use the current situation is likely to deter occupiers of the retail space above from utilising the basement storage area. 10. I conclude that the proposal would not harm the character and function of the Notting Hill District Shopping Centre with particular regard to retail storage space. It would comply with Policy CF3 of the Local Plan (2019) which amongst other matters seeks to ensure that the success and vitality of town centres are protected. Residents parking provision 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision The proposed development makes no provision for on-site parking and there is the potential for it to generate demand for additional on street parking within the Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ). The appellant has provided a Unilateral Undertaking (UU) as the mechanism to ensure that the development would be car-free by preventing occupiers from obtaining a parking permit. The Council has confirmed that a legal agreement that would prevent future occupiers from obtaining a residents parking permit would overcome its concerns. 12. From my site visit I saw that the on-street parking close to the property was in demand and the street was busy. Additional residents searching for parking spaces could cause highway safety issues in the area. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K5600/W/23/3315061 13. The UU includes the legislation under which it is made, sets out the requirements, defines the site and is dated and duly executed. As such, I am satisfied that the UU serves to ensure that the development would be car-free by preventing occupiers from obtaining a parking permit. 14. In this case a negatively worded condition restricting on street parking would not meet the criteria in the Planning Policy Guidance as there is a signed UU in place. 15. Consequently, the proposed development would not affect the residents parking provision in the area. It would therefore comply with Policy CT1 of the Local Plan (2019) which amongst other matters, requires that all new residential development be permit-free. Other Matters 16. The appeal site is within the Kensington Conservation Area. The proposal does not include external alterations to the front of the building. Accordingly, the proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and there are no adverse impacts of granting permission. 17. Both parties agree that there is an absence of a 5-year supply of housing.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision Whilst the proposed development would create an additional dwelling adding to the areas housing stock and supporting the Government’s objective of boosting the supply of homes, permission already exists for a flat. In this case there the proposal would not deliver a net increase in housing stock in the area. Conditions 18. I have considered the conditions suggested by the Council in accordance with the Framework and Planning Practice Guidance. A condition specifying that the development is undertaken in accordance with the approved drawings is necessary to provide certainty and a condition requiring materials to match the exterior of the building is necessary to preserve the character and appearance of the area. 19. I have amended condition 3 to occur prior to first occupation, as on my site visit, I saw that work had commenced in line with the previously approved scheme, PP/22/00083. It is necessary to preserve the character and appearance of the area and to protect the living conditions of future occupiers. Conclusion 20. The proposal does not conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations, including the provisions of the Framework, which outweigh this finding. 21.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — Appeal Decision For the reasons given the appeal should be allowed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 H Senior

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — H Senior INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 3 · Chunk 9 H Senior

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — H Senior INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3 Appeal Decision APP/K5600/W/23/3315061 Schedule of Conditions 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: A_PL_099 rev. B, A_PL_100 rev. 00, A_PL_400 rev. 00, A_PL_050 rev. 00, A_PL_051 rev. 00, A_PL_200 rev. 00, A_PL_201 rev. 00, A_PL_500 Location Plan, A_PL_550 Block Plan 3) Prior to first occupation full particulars of the following have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall not be completed otherwise than in accordance with the details so approved and maintained thereafter: (a) Cycle parking for the new dwelling at lower ground floor level; (b) Facilities and arrangements for storage and disposal of refuse and recycling for the new dwelling at lower ground floor level; and (c) Scheme of sound insulation between the lower ground floor residential use and ground floor retail use.

Page 4 · Chunk 10 H Senior

Basement, 4A Campden Street, London, W8 7EP — Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea — H Senior 4) All work and work of making good shall be finished to match the existing exterior of the building in respect of materials, colour, texture, profile and, in the case of brickwork, facebond and pointing, and shall be so maintained. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶10

The inspector concluded that the proposal would not harm the character and function of the Notting Hill District Shopping Centre, due to the lack of street frontage and the change in layout to facilitate the approved scheme.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶16

The proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the Kensington Conservation Area, as there were no external alterations to the front of the building.

Parking
Against appellant
¶11

The inspector concluded that the proposed development would not affect the residents parking provision in the area, as the Unilateral Undertaking (UU) would prevent occupiers from obtaining a parking permit.

Housing land supply
For appellant
¶17

The inspector noted that the proposed development would create an additional dwelling, but that permission already existed for a flat, so it would not deliver a net increase in housing stock in the area.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶18

The inspector considered the conditions suggested by the Council, and amended condition 3 to occur prior to first occupation, as necessary to preserve the character and appearance of the area and protect the living conditions of future occupiers.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
CF3 of the Local Plan (2019)
Determinative
CT1 of the Local Plan (2019)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 15 March 2024 under the Open Government Licence.