Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR

Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 20 June 2023 by J Moore BA (Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11 September 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/G2245/W/22/3313352 Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, Sevenoaks, Kent TN15 0JR • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr and Mrs Mourgue d'Algue for a full award of costs against Sevenoaks District Council. • The appeal was against the grant subject to conditions of planning permission for Construction of open air swimming pool with associated landscaping. Demolition of existing garages and garden wall, construction of detached garage with associated landscaping and gates. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision Unreasonable behaviour in the context of an application for an award of costs may be either procedural (relating to the process), or substantive (relating to the issues arising from the merits of the appeal). 4. The claim is made only on substantive grounds, whereby it is claimed that the Council acted unreasonably by imposing a condition to the grant of planning permission (Ref: 22/02500/HOUSE), which restricted certain permitted development rights under the GPDO1. 5. The applicant claims that the Council’s reasoning is inconsistent with the guidance and criteria of adopted policy; and that the blanket removal of permitted development rights conflicts with the advice contained at paragraphs 17 and 54 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). 6. The Council considered the proposed development with regard to Policy GB3 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan 2015 and I have found that this approach to be in conformity with the Framework, and in accordance with established practice. Thus, it was not necessary for the Council to address whether or not it should be considered as an exception under paragraph 149 g) of the Framework which refers to previously development land.

Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision 1 The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision 1 The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/G2245/W/22/3313352 7. The condition seeks to restrict certain classes of development under the GDPO, and thus it is not a blanket removal of all permitted development rights. For example, the condition does not specify classes B or C of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the GPDO. 8. For the reasons above, I find that the Council’s behaviour was not unreasonable in its consideration of the planning application, and also with regard to the need to impose a condition to restrict certain development rights. 9. Therefore, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not occurred and an award of costs is not warranted.

Hatch House, Bridle Road, Godden Green, SEVENOAKS, TN15 0JR — Sevenoaks District Council — J Moore INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2