Case 3311757

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX

Peak District — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
18 May 2023
Authority
Peak District
Inspector
Moulton E
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Appellant
Mr J A Moorcroft
LPA reference
NP/HPK/1021/1120
ONS LPA code
E26000006
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
31 January 2023

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed due to the proposed agricultural building being in a location where it would not be conspicuous, and its design would not introduce an urbanising feature in the rural setting.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 11 April 2023 by Elaine Moulton BA (Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 18 May 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/M9496/W/22/3311757 Land South of Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton SK17 8EX • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr J A Moorcroft against the decision of Peak District National Park Authority. • The application Ref NP/HPK/1021/1120, dated 19 October 2021, was refused by notice dated 25 July 2022. • The development proposed is described as ‘proposed agricultural building to house, feed, handle and lamb sheep and to store fodder’. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for agricultural building to house, feed, handle and lamb sheep and to store fodder at land south of Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton SK17 8EX in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref NP/HPK/1021/1120, dated 19 October 2021, subject to the following conditions: 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1451-001, 1451-002 and 1451-003. 3) The development hereby permitted shall not be brought into use until a detailed landscape and planting strategy is submitted to and approved in writing the National Park Authority. The approved strategy shall be implemented in the first planting season following construction of the agricultural building. Any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species. 4) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any equivalent Order following the amendment, re-enactment or revocation thereof) the use of the building hereby permitted shall be restricted to agriculture only (as defined in section 336 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) and for no other purpose.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision 5) When the building hereby permitted is no longer required for the purposes of agriculture it shall be dismantled and removed from the site and the site restored to its original condition. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision 5) When the building hereby permitted is no longer required for the purposes of agriculture it shall be dismantled and removed from the site and the site restored to its original condition. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M9496/W/22/3311757 Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Peak District National Park. 3. The description of development given in my formal decision omits a word from the description provided on the planning application form. The omitted word, ‘proposed’, does not describe acts of development. Reasons 4. The appeal site is the end of a long, narrow field, one of many fields bounded by stone walls in the area. It is within the enclosed gritstone upland area of the Dark Peak, which is within the Peak District National Park. Paragraph 176 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) makes clear that great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues. 5. The landscape is characterised by, amongst other things, high rolling upland with some steep slopes, permanent pasture and rough grazing enclosed by gritstone walls, and regular patterns of medium to large fields. 6. The Council accepts that the need for the additional floorspace within the proposed agricultural building has been demonstrated.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision Based on the information provided I agree that the proposal would accord with the requirements of Policy DME1A of the Core Strategy1 (CS). 7. The appeal site is located adjoining a stone wall, on high ground at the end of a gated track, some distance from Peaslow Lane. Close to the site is a tall lattice telecommunications mast and 3 associated pitched roof buildings and ground- based equipment. Therefore, whilst the proposed agricultural building would be separate from the farmstead it would not be in an isolated position devoid of buildings. Furthermore, it would not require any obtrusive access tracks given that one already exists. 8. The proposed building is relatively modest in scale, albeit larger than the 3 adjacent buildings combined. It would have the appearance of a typical agricultural building, although not in the traditional materials and design of the local vernacular. The use of treated Yorkshire boarding for the walls and fibre cement sheeting for the roof, in a deep brown, would be unobtrusive in this landscape. It would relate well to the buildings associated with the mast and would not introduce an urbanising feature that would appear out of place in this rural setting. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision The National Park Authority are critical of the appellant’s landscape assessment, considering that the supporting photographs are from viewpoints purposefully selected to show that the development would not impact the valued characteristics of the landscape. From my observations of the site and surroundings on my visit I noted that the proposal would be visible at a distance on the ridge of a hill from many public vantage points, including nearby public footpaths and from the public highway. 1 Peak District National Park Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Development Plan Document (Adopted October 2011) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision The National Park Authority are critical of the appellant’s landscape assessment, considering that the supporting photographs are from viewpoints purposefully selected to show that the development would not impact the valued characteristics of the landscape. From my observations of the site and surroundings on my visit I noted that the proposal would be visible at a distance on the ridge of a hill from many public vantage points, including nearby public footpaths and from the public highway. 1 Peak District National Park Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Development Plan Document (Adopted October 2011) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M9496/W/22/3311757 10. The building as proposed, however, would be seen in the context of the mast and the associated buildings and equipment. The mast, given its considerable height, bulk and appearance would remain a strident and prominent feature in this setting. Even with the proposed building in situ, the mast would continue to draw the eye. The introduction of the proposed building would therefore not attract further attention to the site. As such, by virtue of its position next to the mast, the proposed building would be visible, but not conspicuous, in the wider landscape and would not exacerbate the harm arising from the mast and the associated buildings. 11. Furthermore, the retention of the stone wall and the implementation of a native planting scheme adjoining the building, as proposed, would assist in its assimilation into the landscape. Thus, any adverse effects on the area’s valued characteristics would be avoided and the landscape and scenic beauty of the National Park would be conserved. 12. Accordingly, the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the Peak District National Park.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision It would not, therefore, conflict with CS Policies GSP1, GSP3 and L1 and Policies DMC1 and DME1 of the Development Management Policies document2. Such policies seek to ensure that development would be consistent with the statutory purposes of the National Park and avoid an adverse effect on the area’s valued characteristics. Conditions 13. The Authority have suggested several conditions which I have considered alongside the advice in the National Planning Policy Framework and Planning Practice Guidance. I find them to be reasonable and necessary in the circumstances of this case for the reasons below. However, some have been edited for precision and clarity. 14. In addition to the standard condition limiting the lifespan of the planning permission, I have imposed a condition specifying the approved plans as this provides certainty. 15. If the building becomes redundant for agricultural purposes the Authority proposes its removal and the subsequent reinstatement of the land. I consider that such a condition is necessary to avoid any harmful effect that a redundant building could have on the natural beauty of the National Park.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision The approval and implementation of a planting scheme is also required to minimise the effect of the development on the landscape as set out above. I have, however, amended the wording of the suggested condition to specify the replacement of trees or plants within a five year period from the completion of the development 16. The Framework in paragraph 54 states that planning conditions should not be used to restrict national permitted development rights unless there is clear justification to do so. In this case the proposal has been justified on the basis of a specific agricultural need in a countryside location in the National Park, where the development plan applies strict control over the uses of land. It is therefore reasonable to attach a condition restricting its use for that purpose. 2 Peak District National Park Development Management Policies – Part 2 of the Local Plan for the Peak District National Park (Adopted May 2019) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 11 Appeal Decision

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M9496/W/22/3311757 Conclusion 17. For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Page 4 · Chunk 12 Elaine Moulton

Peaslow Lane, Sparrowpit, Buxton, SK17 8EX — Peak District — Elaine Moulton INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶10

The inspector considered that the building, although visible, would not attract further attention to the site due to its position next to the mast, and its design would not exacerbate the harm arising from the mast and associated buildings.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶11

The retention of the stone wall and implementation of a native planting scheme would assist in the building's assimilation into the landscape, conserving the landscape and scenic beauty of the National Park.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 208
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 18 May 2023 under the Open Government Licence.