Case 3310556

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR

Cornwall Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
14 July 2023
Authority
Cornwall Council
Inspector
Cresswell C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Mr John Slade
LPA reference
PA22/05269
ONS LPA code
E06000052
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
4 April 2023

Summary AI

The appellant's application for a full award of costs was refused. The inspector considered that the Council's reasons for refusal were justified by their assessment of the proposal against the development plan, specifically Policy 5.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR — Cornwall Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 26 May 2023 by C Cresswell BSc (Hons) MA MBA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 July 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/D0840/W/22/3310556 Recreational Building at Roskorwell, Roskorwell, St Keverne TR12 6PR • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by John Slade for a full award of costs against Cornwall Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for change of use of recreational building into a holiday use. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The appellant argues that the Council treated the proposal as if it were for an open market dwelling rather than a holiday let. Both the Officer Report and the Council’s Statement assess the proposal against Policy 7 of the Local Plan which is concerned with housing in the open countryside and says that development is only allowed under special circumstances. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR — Cornwall Council — Costs Decision It seems to me that the Council’s reference to Policy 7 was to demonstrate that it had considered the proposal against the development plan as a whole. The Council justify why they consider Policy 7 to be relevant to the proposal in paragraph 5.7 of their Statement where it is mentioned that the building contains all the necessary facilities for day-to-day living. While this approach deviates somewhat from the main issue, it is nonetheless a reasonable approach to take. Besides, the Council was not entirely reliant on Policy 7 to maintain its objection. It also assessed the proposal against Policy 5, which more directly addresses the issue of tourist accommodation. 4. The Council’s reference to the site being in the open countryside is of relevance to Policy 5 as well as Policy 7. The test in Policy 5 is whether the tourist accommodation is of an appropriate scale for its location and accessible to a range of transport modes. Paragraphs 5.10-5.11 of the Council’s Statement provides a clear assessment of how the location of the building in the open countryside affects its accessibility in the context of Policy 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR — Cornwall Council — Costs Decision While the appellant claims that the Council has taken no account of the public transport connection, this is very clearly covered in paragraph 5.3 of the Council Statement, which even includes a copy of the timetable. 5. Although the appellant suggests that the Council’s reasons for refusal could have been dealt by a holiday-use condition, the Council has explained in some detail why it considers the proposal to conflict with Policy 5. Hence, imposing https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR — Cornwall Council — Costs Decision While the appellant claims that the Council has taken no account of the public transport connection, this is very clearly covered in paragraph 5.3 of the Council Statement, which even includes a copy of the timetable. 5. Although the appellant suggests that the Council’s reasons for refusal could have been dealt by a holiday-use condition, the Council has explained in some detail why it considers the proposal to conflict with Policy 5. Hence, imposing https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/D0840/W/22/3310556 such a condition would not have overcome the Council’s objections. This is not an example of local planning authority delaying development which should have clearly been permitted. 6. Overall, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not been demonstrated.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Colin Cresswell

Land and Building at Roskorwell, St. Keverne, HELSTON, TR12 6PR — Cornwall Council — Colin Cresswell INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶2

The inspector considered that the Council's assessment of the proposal against Policy 5 was reasonable and not entirely reliant on Policy 7.

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶4

The inspector noted that the Council's reference to the site being in the open countryside was relevant to both Policy 5 and Policy 7, and that the assessment of accessibility in paragraph 5.10-5.11 was clear.

Affordable housing
Against appellant
¶5

The inspector considered that imposing a holiday-use condition would not have overcome the Council's objections, as the Council had explained in detail why the proposal conflicted with Policy 5.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Local Plan 5
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 July 2023 under the Open Government Licence.