Case 3310359

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY

New Forest District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
17 August 2023
Authority
New Forest District Council
Inspector
Redford R
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr and Mrs - Radford
LPA reference
22/10746
ONS LPA code
E07000091
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
1 March 2023

Summary AI

The inspector dismissed the appeal due to the potential harm to protected habitats sites and the inability to secure necessary mitigation measures. The proposal would have contributed to increased population and visitor pressure, and would have had a significant effect on the habitats.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 7 August 2023 by R J Redford MTCP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 17 August 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/B1740/W/22/3310359 9A Belstone Road, Totton, Hampshire SO40 8DY • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr and Mrs Radford against the decision of New Forest District Council. • The application Ref 22/10746, dated 15 June 2022, was refused by notice dated 3 October 2022. • The development proposed is the demolition of the existing building and construction of four houses with associated access, parking and landscaping. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matters 2. For clarity, the plans considered within this appeal are PL01_Rev B and PL03_Rev A. These have been confirmed by the Council as the plans its decision was made on. Main Issues 3. The main issues are the effect of the proposed development on protected habitats sites and the character and appearance of the Belstone Road. Reasons Protected habitats sites (PHS) 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision The appeal site sits within the zone of influence of several PHS, the New Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, The Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar site, The Solent Maritime SAC, and the Solent and Dorset Coast SPA. All of which provide rare and specialist habitats for a wide range of species. 5. Policy ENV1 of the New Forest District Local Plan Part 1: Planning Strategy (LPPS) and Policy DM2 of the New Forest District Local Plan Part 2: Sites and Development Management (LPSDM) state, amongst other things, that new development will only be permitted if any adverse effects to the integrity of PHS can be mitigated against. 6. The PHS are susceptible to disturbance by human activity. The additional dwellings proposed, would contribute to an increased population in combination with other plans, projects, and developments in the area. Given the proximity of the development to the PHS, it is therefore likely that its contribution to the increase in population could lead to an increase in visitor and recreational https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B1740/W/22/3310359 pressure within them. The water environment of the Solent PHS also requires action to be taken in relation to nutrient neutrality. This is due to excessive nutrients causing eutrophication, which, in part, come from domestic wastewater. The increase in air pollution from additional traffic related to the development would also impact the air quality of the New Forest PHS. 7. Given the susceptibility and vulnerability of the qualifying features of the PHS, and in combination with other projects, the proposal would likely have a significant effect on the PHS. 8. As such Clause 63(1) of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 states that ‘a competent authority, before deciding to undertake, or give any consent, permission… must make an appropriate assessment’. In this case, as the competent authority, I acknowledge the appropriate assessment undertaken by the Council. This concludes that the use of the Council’s established mitigation strategies would allow financial contributions to be paid to offset any potential recreational pressure and air quality harm.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision It also concludes that the use of a negatively worded ‘Grampian’ condition could be used to secure an appropriate scheme of mitigation to ensure the proposal is nutrient neutral. 9. The appellant has stated they are willing to pay the financial contributions towards mitigation against recreational pressure and air quality harm. However, there is no mechanism before me to secure such contributions. Nor is there any evidence as to how nutrient neutrality for the proposal could be achieved. Therefore, even were there a suitable mechanism to secure these financial contributions, there is not enough detail before me to provide the certainty required to rely on a condition to secure a nutrient neutral development. 10. Consequently, without appropriate methods to secure the necessary mitigation, the proposal would likely have a significant harmful effect on the PHS. It is acknowledged that the proposal could provide sufficient biodiversity net gain, however this does not mitigate the potential harm to the PHS. Accordingly, the proposal would be contrary to LPPS Policy ENV1 and LPSDM policy DM2 on this matter. Character and appearance 11. Belstone Road is an L shaped residential cul-de-sac within a suburban residential area.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision The properties on the road are typical of the wider area and have 2 storeys, are traditional in design and either semi-detached or detached. The majority have off-road parking, but on visiting the site it was evident that on-road parking was also utilised. It is, however, noted that this is unrestricted except around the junction with Ringwood Road. 12. The appeal site is a large corner plot located at the end of Belstone Road. The existing dwelling is at the front of the site. To the rear of the site is the railway with the cricket ground to one side, both of which are well screened from the site by maturely planted boundaries. 13. The proposed dwellings would be traditional in design, finished in materials which would complement those used in the surrounding area, and meet the appropriate internal and external space standards. Their set back position and the demolition of the existing dwelling would present a more open aspect to https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B1740/W/22/3310359 the end of the cul-de-sac, which currently appears enclosed due to the proximity of the properties to the road edge. This would also mean the proposal would not be overly visible when travelling up Belstone Road so would not have a dominating or overwhelming impact on the existing streetscene. 14. The density of the proposed development would be slightly higher than existing. However, it is evident that within the wider area there is a broad mix of housing forms and densities reflecting the suburban nature of the locality. Thus, in consideration of the wider context, and the relatively small size of the proposal, the proposed density would not be out of character. Therefore, although not the most innovative of schemes, it would not be harmful to the overall character and appearance of Belstone Road. 15. It is acknowledged that the proposal would increase the number of vehicles that would use Belstone Road and does not provide specific visitor parking. However, there is no technical evidence before me to contradict the Local Highway Authorities conclusion that the proposed parking would be adequate and that the proposal would not harm highway safety. 16.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, it is appreciated the proposal has potential to increase the demand for on-road parking along Belstone Road. But as this is unrestricted and could be fully utilised at any time currently, any over spill parking from the proposal would have no more affect on the character and appearance of the road then the existing situation. Notwithstanding this, on-road parking can be controlled by other regulatory mechanisms which could be implemented without being affected by the outcome of this decision. 17. Accordingly, the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of Belstone Road. It would, therefore, comply with LPPS Policy ENV3 which, amongst other things, requires new development to be sympathetic to its context. Planning Balance 18. The Council cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, as such it is necessary for me to apply paragraph 11 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). 19. The proposal would provide a net gain of 3 dwellings in an accessible location, reasonably quickly, due to its small scale. The Framework also seeks to boost significantly the supply of housing and recognises the importance of small sites in meeting the housing requirements of an area.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, this contribution to the Council’s 5-year housing land supply, along with the associated economic and social benefits, and biodiversity enhancements discussed in the first main issue, would attract moderate weighting based on the number of houses involved. 20. No harm has been identified in relation to highway safety, parking, living conditions of neighbouring residents, trees, and, as set out in the second main issue, character and appearance. Nevertheless, a lack of harm is a neutral factor so cannot weigh for or against the proposal. 21. However, housing provision should not come at the cost of significant harm to PHS, a position supported by the Framework. Thus, when weighed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, the adverse impacts of granting https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B1740/W/22/3310359 planning permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits in my view. Other Matters 22. It is noted that the officer report differed to the outcome of the application decision, however the Council is not bound to accept the recommendations of its officer. This does not affect the planning merits of the case. Conclusion 23. Consequently, for the reasons given above the appeal scheme would conflict with the development plan when read as a whole and there are no sufficiently weighted material considerations, including the Framework, which would indicate a decision otherwise. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 R J Redford

9A Belstone Road, Totton, SOUTHAMPTON, SO40 8DY — New Forest District Council — R J Redford INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶5

The proposal would likely have a significant effect on the protected habitats sites due to the proximity of the development to the sites.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶8

The use of mitigation strategies would not be sufficient to offset the potential harm to the habitats, and there is no mechanism to secure financial contributions to mitigate recreational pressure and air quality harm.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶14

The proposed development would not have a dominating or overwhelming impact on the existing streetscene, and would not be out of character with the surrounding area.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶17

The proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of Belstone Road, and would comply with policy ENV3.

Parking
For appellant
¶15

The proposed parking would be adequate, and there is no technical evidence to contradict the Local Highway Authorities conclusion that the proposal would not harm highway safety.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
ENV1 (LPPS)
Determinative
DM2 (LPSDM)
Determinative
ENV3 (LPPS)
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 17 August 2023 under the Open Government Licence.