Case 3309813

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ

East Suffolk — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
15 September 2023
Authority
East Suffolk
Inspector
Palmer N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr and Mrs R Sannick
LPA reference
DC/22/0855/OUT
ONS LPA code
E07000244
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
8 February 2023

Summary AI

The appeal for outline planning permission to build a detached dwelling at Bell View Farm, Cratfield, Suffolk, was dismissed due to harm to the character and appearance of the area and lack of accessibility to services and facilities by sustainable means. The development would intrude into the historic landscape feature of the village green and would not accord with local planning policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 September 2023 by Nick Palmer BA (Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 15 September 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/X3540/W/22/3309813 Bell View Farm, Manse Lane, Cratfield, Suffolk IP19 0DJ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr and Mrs Sannick against the decision of East Suffolk Council. • The application Ref DC/22/0855/OUT, dated 3 March 2022, was refused by notice dated 20 May 2022. • The development proposed is erection of a detached dwelling utilising the existing access to Bell View Farm. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matters 2. The application is for outline planning permission with details of the means of access submitted for approval. An indicative site plan has been submitted and I shall consider that plan on this basis. 3. The appellant has submitted a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal with the appeal, which addresses the Council’s second reason for refusal. Accordingly, I shall not consider this as a main issue. Main Issues 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision The main issues in the appeal are: i) the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on heritage assets; and ii) its accessibility to services and facilities by sustainable means. Reasons Character and Appearance 5. The settlement of Cratfield is a small hamlet. Historically it included a village green on both sides of Bell Green. This was enclosed following the Enclosure Act of 1849. Development has subsequently taken place along the road within the area of the former green but to a limited extent. The area around the junction of Bell Green and Manse Lane remains open and the site occupies part of this open area. It forms part of the curtilage of Bell View Farm and appeared on my visit to be part of the garden to that property, although I note that interested parties have referred to it as a meadow. On the opposite side https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X3540/W/22/3309813 of Bell Green there is a graveyard and open land in front of Bell Farm. To the south-east of the road junction there is garden land to Bell Green Cottage. 6. The site is in the countryside for planning policy purposes. Policy SCLP5.3 of the Suffolk Coastal Local Plan (2020) (LP) limits residential development outside of the settlement boundaries which are defined on the adopted Policies Map. This policy allows for limited development within existing clusters. Policy SCLP5.4 of the LP sets out requirements for such development. A ‘cluster’ is defined in the policy as a continuous line of existing dwellings or a close group of existing dwellings adjacent to an existing highway and which contains 5 or more dwellings. The Council’s Supplementary Planning Document1 provides guidance on this policy. 7. There are continuous lines of development on Bell Green on both sides of the junction, but these are separated by the open area around the junction. The dwellings off Manse Lane are informally sited and set back from the road by varying distances. The degree of separation between the dwellings to the north and south of Manse Lane is such that those dwellings do not form a close group. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision In my view the two dwellings to the immediate north of the site2 are part of a continuous line of development rather than part of a group in conjunction with Bell View Farm, The Manse and Salisbury House. For this reason and those given above I do not consider the site to be within a cluster as defined in the policy. 9. However, if the site were to be considered as part of a cluster for the purposes of Policy SCLP5.4, criterion (d) requires that the development would not cause undue harm to the character and appearance of the cluster or result in any harmful visual intrusion into the surrounding landscape. 10. Details of layout or scale have not been submitted. The existing hedges along the road boundaries would permit views of the dwelling. The development to the north of the site extends towards Bell Green, but the site clearly forms a key part of the open area adjacent to the road junction. The development would be intrusive in this context. The hedges could be increased in height or additional planting provided which could provide some visual screening. Nonetheless it is likely that the dwelling would be visible at least along the access drive from Manse Lane. 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision The dwelling would intrude into the open space that was historically part of the village green. This is an important local landscape feature and is recorded in the Suffolk Historic Environment Record.3 12. The appellant has suggested setting the dwelling back behind a line drawn from Meadowside House to Bell Green Cottage. This may limit visual intrusion across the corner, but it would not overcome the intrusion of the development into the historic landscape feature. For these reasons, the proposal would not accord with Policy SCLP5.4(d) of the LP. 1 Housing in Clusters and Small Scale Residential Development in the Countryside Supplementary Planning Document (2022) 2 Meadowside House and Wivern House 3 https://heritage.suffolk.gov.uk/Monument/MSF6794 (Ref. CRT 015) https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X3540/W/22/3309813 13. It would also conflict with policies SCLP3.3 and SCLP5.3 of the LP which both resist residential development in the countryside. 14. Policy SCLP5.7 allows for residential development within existing gardens where there would be no harm to the character of the area. For the reasons given, the proposal would not accord with that policy. 15. Bell Farm is listed at Grade II. This is a historic farmhouse which is set back from Bell Green and accessed from it. It has historically faced the village green, and the site forms a remnant of that open space. Because Bell Farm has historically been associated with the village green, this contributes to its significance. 16. Bell Green Cottage is also listed at Grade II. This was originally a pair of cottages dating from the 18th century and is now one dwelling. It is on the southern side of Manse Lane and faces the site. Similar to Bell Farm, the open nature of the site as a remnant of the village green contributes to the significance of Bell Green Cottage. 17. The proposed dwelling would remove part of the historic green and would intrude into the settings of both of those listed buildings.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision It would for these reasons harm the significance of those heritage assets. 18. This harm would be less than substantial because the effect on the remaining part of the green would be partial. The proposed dwelling would be beneficial in terms of contributing to housing supply, but the Council is able to demonstrate a 5-year supply of deliverable housing sites. The economic benefit from construction of the dwelling would be limited. Biodiversity improvements have been offered but no details have been provided and for this reason this cannot be given material weight. The public benefit is not sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the heritage assets. 19. Policy SCLP11.3 of the LP states that the policies of the National Planning Policy Framework will be applied in respect of heritage assets. Policy SCLP11.4 requires development affecting the setting of a listed building not to harm its character. For the reasons given the proposal would not accord with those policies. 20. Policy SCLP10.4 of the LP requires protection and enhancement of the special qualities and features of the area. The site is within the Plateau Claylands character area in the Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment (LCA).

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision This states that parishes in this landscape tend to consist of multiple clusters of varying sizes and that ribbon development can destroy this pattern. 21. The open area at the junction of Manse Lane and Bell Green is consistent with the pattern of settlement described in the LCA. Because the development would erode this open area it would not accord with Policy SCLP10.4. The proposal would also not accord with Policy SCLP12.34 of the LP which requires protection and enhancement of landscapes. 22. Policy SCLP3.1 of the LP provides for growth, including in rural areas but requires protection and enhancement of the quality of the historic, built and natural environment. For the reasons given the proposal would not accord with that policy. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X3540/W/22/3309813 23. I conclude on this issue, for the reasons given, that the development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area. Accessibility 24. Other than a church, play area and village hall, there are no local services or facilities for day-to-day needs in Cratfield. There is no bus service to any higher order settlement. Consequently, it would be necessary for the occupants of the proposed dwelling to travel by car to access services and facilities on a day-to-day basis. The nearest settlements with any facilities are 5km away and while cycle journeys to those settlements may be possible it is likely that occupiers of the proposed dwelling would be reliant on the car for transport. The proposal is not supported by Policy SCLP7.1 of the LP which requires that development is located close to and provides safe pedestrian and cycle access to services and facilities. 25. I conclude on this issue that the proposal would not be accessible to services and facilities by sustainable means. Conclusion 26. For the reasons given, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 Nick Palmer

Bell View Farm Manse Lane, Cratfield, HALESWORTH, IP19 0DJ — East Suffolk — Nick Palmer INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5-23

The development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the area due to its intrusion into the historic village green and conflict with local planning policies.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶24

The proposed dwelling would not be accessible to services and facilities by sustainable means due to the lack of local amenities and reliance on cars for transport.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SCLP5.3
Limited
SCLP5.4
Determinative
SCLP3.3
Substantial
SCLP5.7
Moderate
SCLP11.3
Determinative
SCLP11.4
Substantial
SCLP10.4
Determinative
SCLP12.34
Determinative
SCLP3.1
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 15 September 2023 under the Open Government Licence.