Case 3309684

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA

Sevenoaks District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
12 September 2023
Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Inspector
Moore J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
Dr's G Hollingworth & L Murtagh
LPA reference
SE/22/00936/HOUSE
ONS LPA code
E07000111
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
27 April 2023

Summary AI

The applicant's claim for an award of costs against Sevenoaks District Council was dismissed. The Inspector found that the Council's behaviour in imposing a condition to restrict certain permitted development rights was reasonable and necessary. The applicant had claimed that the Council's behaviour was unreasonable and had caused unnecessary expense in the appeal process.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 20 June 2023 by J Moore BA (Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12 September 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/G2245/W/22/3309684 Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Westerham, Kent TN16 1NA • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Dr G Hollingworth & Dr L Murtagh for a full award of costs against Sevenoaks District Council. • The appeal was against the grant subject to conditions of planning permission for Addition of hipped roof to existing first floor flat roof (south elevation), installation of glass balustrade to existing flat roof on the south elevation and balcony access door. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision Unreasonable behaviour in the context of an application for an award of costs may be either procedural (relating to the process), or substantive (relating to the issues arising from the merits of the appeal). 4. The applicant’s claim is advanced on substantive grounds, whereby the applicant considers that the Council acted unreasonably by imposing a condition to the grant of planning permission (Ref: 22/00936/HOUSE), which restricted certain permitted development rights under the GPDO1. 5. The applicant claims that the Council’s reasoning is inconsistent with the guidance and criteria of adopted policy; and that the blanket removal of permitted development rights conflicts with the advice contained at paragraphs 17 and 54 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). 6. The Council considered the proposed development with regard to Policy GB1 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan 2015 and I have found this approach to be in conformity with the Framework. I have also found that the condition imposed was reasonable and necessary in this particular regard. 7.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision The condition seeks to restrict certain classes of development under the GDPO, limited to classes A-E of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the GPDO, and thus it is not a blanket removal of all permitted development rights. For example, it does not 1 The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA — Sevenoaks District Council — Costs Decision The condition seeks to restrict certain classes of development under the GDPO, limited to classes A-E of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the GPDO, and thus it is not a blanket removal of all permitted development rights. For example, it does not 1 The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/G2245/W/22/3309684 seek to remove such rights under classes F, G or H of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the GPDO. 8. For the reasons above, I find that the Council’s behaviour was not unreasonable in its consideration of the planning application, and also with regard to the need to impose a condition to restrict certain development rights. 9. Therefore, unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense has not occurred and an award of costs is not warranted.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 J Moore

Rothbury Canons Walk, Brasted Chart, Kent, WESTERHAM, TN16 1NA — Sevenoaks District Council — J Moore INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶6

The Council's approach to the proposed development was in conformity with the National Planning Policy Framework, and the condition imposed was reasonable and necessary.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The Council's behaviour in imposing a condition to restrict certain development rights was found to be reasonable and necessary.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy GB1, Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan 2015
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 September 2023 under the Open Government Licence.