The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS
West Northamptonshire — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Authority
- West Northamptonshire
- Inspector
- Sabu R
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Peter Kane
- LPA reference
- WND/2022/0511
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Lead
- Start date
- 27 January 2023
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the Grade II listed buildings and the Scaldwell Conservation Area. The inspector found that the harm to the designated heritage assets outweighed any public benefits.
PDF text
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — by R Sabu BA(Hons), MA, BArch, PgDip, RIBA, ARB an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24th May 2023
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — NN6 9JS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Peter Kane against the decision of West Northamptonshire Council. • The application Ref WND/2022/0511, dated 1 June 2022, was refused by notice dated 13 September 2022. • The development proposed is described as, ‘Demolition of existing barn and construction of new double garage. Alterations to stone boundary wall, including reduction in height and widening vehicular access. The wall is to be taken down to the height of the rest of the boundary wall. One metre of wall is to be removed adjacent to the entrance.’
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — NN6 9JS • The appeal is made under section 20 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 against a refusal to grant listed building consent. • The appeal is made by Mr Peter Kane against the decision of West Northamptonshire Council. • The application Ref WND/2022/0512, dated 1 June 2022, was refused by notice dated 17 August 2022. • The works proposed are described as, ‘Demolition of existing barn and construction of new double garage. Alterations to stone boundary wall, including reduction in height and widening vehicular access. The wall is to be taken down to the height of the rest of the boundary wall. One metre of wall is to be removed adjacent to the entrance.’
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decisions APP/W2845/W/22/3308836 and APP/W2845/Y/22/3308837 Reasons 4. The SCA comprises tight, small-scale streets radiating from the central enclosed space of the village green. As set out in the Scaldwell Conservation Area Appraisal and Design Guide, High Street, on which the site lies, has a strong linear sense of enclosure created by a hard frontage of two and three storey buildings and high walls. It is also a main route running through the village to the village green and is characterised by stone houses mainly of 18th and 19th century origin. Given the above, I find that the significance of the SCA, insofar as it relates to these appeals, to be primarily associated with the strong linear pattern of development and the way the buildings of varying ages and styles reflect the evolution of the village. 5. Rectory Farmhouse was listed in 1985 and dates from the mid-18th century. It lies opposite the Old Rectory and was once owned by the church serving as an ancillary site to the Rectory.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. The front part of the house, facing the street dates from the mid-18th century, while the rear part was built in the mid-19th century with much adornment and rich in architectural details, as set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment. 6. The Wall which lies along the western boundary of the site, is listed in its own right as well as being attached to Rectory Farmhouse and appears to date from the mid-18th century. It forms the western wall of the barn subject of the appeal. 7. Given the above, I find that the special interest of Rectory Farmhouse, insofar as it relates to these appeals, to be primarily associated with the legibility of its 18th and 19th century phasing. The special interest of the Wall lies in its ancillary function in connection with Rectory Farmhouse and its in keeping character. 8. The north and south walls of the Barn are constructed of brick whereas the east and west walls are of stone, the west wall being part of the Wall which runs along the boundary with the street. The evidence indicates that the brick walls of the building may date from the late 18th century or early 19th century. Under section 1(5)(a) of the Act, the listing includes any object or structure fixed to the building.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. As the Wall comprises one of the external walls of the barn, the barn is included in the listing. 9. The demolition of the barn would result in the loss of historic fabric and the contribution it would make to the understanding of the composition. This would result in the erosion of the legibility of the historic phasing of the listed buildings and would therefore adversely affect their special interest. 10. The proposal includes the erection of a garage with a square plan in a similar position as the existing structure but set away from the Wall. It would include a shallow pitched roof and wide gable. As the gable end would span across the full width of two garage doors, the resulting proportions of the elevation would appear squat and out of keeping with the surrounding buildings. The roof pitch would appear noticeably shallower than the south facing gable end of the front part of The Rectory. 11. Although the roof pitch would be similar to that of the existing building, since the proposed roof would have a gable end rather than being hipped and since it https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. Appeal Decisions APP/W2845/W/22/3308836 and APP/W2845/Y/22/3308837 would span over a double garage, the gable end of the proposal would appear more incongruous with its surroundings in comparison. 12. I acknowledge that the proposed materials would be inline with the materials of the existing and surrounding buildings. However, given the above, the wide gable end and shallow roof pitch of the proposal would not appear sympathetic to the traditional steeper roof pitches of the surrounding buildings which lie within the setting of the Wall. Therefore, it would appear incongruous in the street scene, resulting in substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area. Accordingly, the proposal would have an adverse effect on the setting of Rectory Farmhouse and would diminish the special interest and significance of the Wall. 13. Although the proposed garage would be set a short distance away from the Wall, it would nonetheless be visible from the street including through the access and would therefore erode the significance of the SCA. 14. The gable ends at the rear of Rectory Farmhouse do not appear to be as shallow as the proposal and are not readily visible from the street.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. The other surrounding buildings visible from the street also do not seem to have wide gables over double garages. While I note the other examples of wide gables provided by the Appellant, they do not appear to be in close proximity to the appeal site, or within the setting of the listed buildings and are therefore not directly comparable to these appeals. 15. The proposal also includes the removal of a portion of the Wall to widen the vehicular access into the site and a reduction in the height of the wall that forms part of the existing garage. This would result in the loss of historic fabric and the hard frontage created by the wall would be reduced as result of the proposal. As such, this particular aspect of the scheme would also diminish the significance of the SCA. 16. Given the above, I find that the proposal would fail to preserve its special interest, would fail to preserve the setting of Rectory Farmhouse and would fail to preserve the significance of the SCA. Due to the limited scale of the proposal, I find the harm to the significance of each of these designated heritage assets to be less than substantial in this instance but nevertheless of considerable importance and weight. 17.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. Under such circumstances, paragraph 202 of the Framework advises that this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, which includes the securing of optimal viable use of listed buildings. 18. The Barn is in a state of disrepair and the structural report indicates that, due to movement of the walls, leaking through the roof and shrubs growing out of the walls, it is beyond repair. It also states that the Wall shows no signs of instability, and no strengthening works would be required to demolish the rest of the building. The structural report goes on to say that in its current state it presents more of a risk to the Wall than does its removal. 19. As such it appears that the demolition of the barn is necessary to preserve the Wall in the long term. The demolition is therefore also necessary to preserve the special interest of the Wall, and by retaining the wall, would preserve the setting of Rectory Farmhouse and the significance of SCA. On this basis the public benefit of preserving the Wall justifies the loss of the barn. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. Appeal Decisions APP/W2845/W/22/3308836 and APP/W2845/Y/22/3308837 20. In addition, the heritage benefit to the Wall from the demolition of the barn would balance the harm to the special interest of the Wall that would result from the reduction in height of the wall and the removal of part of the Wall to widen the access. This is because the reduction in the height of the wall would bring the height in line with the adjacent parts of the wall and the removal of 1m of the length of the wall would be limited compared with the overall length of the wall along the street. 21. The appellant is of the opinion that the proposal would be beneficial as the widening of the access would improve highway safety. Given the height and position of the existing wall at the back of the pavement, there is limited visibility for motorists exiting the site using the access. The proposed widening of the access by demolishing around 1m width of the wall would be likely to increase visibility from the access and reduce the likelihood of collision with pedestrians. However, given that the widening is around a metre, and the wall would still be tall, the improvement in visibility is likely to be limited. 22.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. I note the evidence regarding the proposed photovoltaic panels. However, there is little substantial evidence before me to indicate that the energy generated would be for public use. While the use of the panels may reduce the burden on local energy supply, any public benefit in this respect would be very limited given the size of the panels. 23. The public benefits to highway safety and the well-being of the Wall that would result from the proposal would be limited and would therefore not outweigh the considerable weight attached to the significance of the Grade II listed Wall, the significance of the Grade II listed Rectory Farmhouse and the significance of the SCA. 24. Given the above, and in the absence of any significant public benefit, I conclude that, on balance, the proposal would fail to preserve the special historic interest of the Grade II listed buildings and the character and appearance of the SCA, thus failing to satisfy the requirements of the Act, paragraph 199 of the Framework and the development plan. 25.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — it would harm the significance of any of these designated heritage assets. In particular, the proposal would conflict with Policy BN5 of the West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan (Part 1) Adopted December 2014 and Policies ENV7 and ENV10 of the Settlements and Countryside Local Plan (Part 2) for Daventry District 2011-2029 Adopted February 2020 which seek, among other things, to secure and enhance the significance of the area's heritage assets and their settings and high quality design that reflects and integrates with the surrounding area. Conclusion 26. For the reasons given above, the appeals are dismissed.
The Rectory Farmhouse, High Street, Scaldwell, NORTHAMPTON, NN6 9JS — West Northamptonshire — R Sabu INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶9
The demolition of the barn would result in the loss of historic fabric and the contribution it would make to the understanding of the composition.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶10
The proposal includes the erection of a garage with a square plan in a similar position as the existing structure but set away from the Wall. It would include a shallow pitched roof and wide gable, which would appear incongruous with the surrounding buildings.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶12
The wide gable end and shallow roof pitch of the proposal would not appear sympathetic to the traditional steeper roof pitches of the surrounding buildings, resulting in substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶13
The proposed garage would be visible from the street, eroding the significance of the SCA.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶15
The removal of a portion of the Wall to widen the vehicular access into the site and a reduction in the height of the wall that forms part of the existing garage would result in the loss of historic fabric and the hard frontage created by the wall.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶17
The harm to the significance of each of the designated heritage assets would be less than substantial but of considerable importance and weight.
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶20
The demolition of the barn is necessary to preserve the Wall in the long term and to preserve the special interest of the Wall, the setting of Rectory Farmhouse, and the significance of SCA.
Parking For appellant ¶21
The proposed widening of the access would improve highway safety by increasing visibility from the access and reducing the likelihood of collision with pedestrians.
Other Against appellant ¶23
The public benefits to highway safety and the well-being of the Wall that would result from the proposal would be limited and would therefore not outweigh the considerable weight attached to the significance of the Grade II listed Wall, the significance of the Grade II listed Rectory Farmhouse, and the significance of the SCA.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Policy BN5 of the West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan (Part 1) Adopted December 2014 |
Determinative |
| Policies ENV7 and ENV10 of the Settlements and Countryside Local Plan (Part 2) for Daventry District 2011-2029 Adopted F |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 24 May 2023 under the Open Government Licence.