Case 3307478

Dunsty Hill Farm, Edgcott Road , Calvert Green , OX27 0BJ

Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area * — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
9 May 2023
Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
Inspector
Murray D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Highbarrow Holdings Limited
LPA reference
22/00540/COUOS
ONS LPA code
E07000004
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Child
Start date
7 February 2023

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs was refused as the Council did not act unreasonably in refusing Prior Approval. The costs incurred by the appellant were normal costs arising from exercising the right of appeal.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Dunsty Hill Farm, Edgcott Road , Calvert Green , OX27 0BJ — Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area * — Costs Decision Site visit made on 25 April 2023 by David Murray BA (Hons) DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 9th May 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/J0405/W/22/3307478 Dunsty Hill Farm, Edgcott Road , Calvert Green , OX27 0BJ Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses. However, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The appellant says the Council has acted unreasonably in refusing to give Prior Approval to a scheme which falls within the provisions of ‘permitted development’. This has resulted in the unnecessary costs of a planning consultant having to prepare the submission for the appeal. 4. In the Prior Approval case I decided that approval should be granted. However, the assessment of the appellant’s and Council’s detailed cases was not straight forward, and the conclusion was finely balanced.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Dunsty Hill Farm, Edgcott Road , Calvert Green , OX27 0BJ — Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area * — Costs Decision I am satisfied that the Council, as represented by the highway authority, was able to substantiate its case on a professional basis with reference to national policy and highway practice. 5. This was not a case of refusing to approve development which should clearly have been permitted as there were legitimate issues on highway capacity and safety and which could also have resulted in the proposed development in this location being impractical or undesirable. 6. Overall, I find that the Council did not act unreasonably in refusing Prior Approval and the costs incurred by the appellant were the normal costs arising when the right of appeal is exercised.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 David Murray

Dunsty Hill Farm, Edgcott Road , Calvert Green , OX27 0BJ — Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area * — David Murray INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Highway safety
Against appellant
¶4

The Council substantiated its case with reference to national policy and highway practice, making it a finely balanced conclusion.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed development in this location was considered impractical or undesirable due to highway capacity and safety concerns.

Conditions
Against appellant
¶6

The costs incurred by the appellant were normal costs arising from exercising the right of appeal.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
national policy and highway practice
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 May 2023 under the Open Government Licence.