Case 3306464

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
21 February 2023
Authority
Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Cuthbert L
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd
LPA reference
PD/22/02146
ONS LPA code
E08000028
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 November 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a 15-metre monopole with associated equipment cabinets and ancillary works at a footpath in Warley, Sandwell, has been allowed. The Inspector considered the siting and appearance of the proposal, and found that it would not harm the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would also not prevent the future development of additional infrastructure for walking/cycling or junction improvement works.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 17 January 2023 by Laura Cuthbert BA(Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 February 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/G4620/W/22/3306464 Area of Footpath, Harvest Road, Warley, Sandwell 400739, 287213 • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). • The appeal is made by CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd against the decision of Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council. • The application Ref PD/22/02146, dated 20 May 2022, was refused by notice dated 11 July 2022. • The development proposed is the installation of a 15-metre monopole complete with wraparound cabinet at base and three additional equipment cabinets and ancillary works. Decision 1.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision The appeal is allowed and approval is granted under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the siting and appearance of a 15-metre monopole complete with wraparound cabinet at base and three additional equipment cabinets and ancillary works at Area of Footpath, Harvest Road, Warley, Sandwell 400739, 287213, in accordance with the application ref: PD/22/02146, dated 20 May 2022, and the plans submitted with it, including drawings titled 002 Site Location Plan, 100 Existing Site Plan, 150 Existing Site Elevation, 215 Proposed Site Plan and 265 Proposed Site Elevation, all of drawing no. SWL20302_SWL217_ 85281_ B1932_GA_REV A. Procedural Matters 2. The provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended (GPDO), under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A, Paragraph A.3(4) require the local planning authority to assess the proposed development solely on the basis of its siting and appearance, taking into account any representations received. My determination of this appeal has been made on the same basis. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision There is no requirement to have regard to the development plan as there would be for any development requiring planning permission. 4. The description in the banner heading above has been taken from the appellants Statement of Case as this more accurately describes the appeal proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision There is no requirement to have regard to the development plan as there would be for any development requiring planning permission. 4. The description in the banner heading above has been taken from the appellants Statement of Case as this more accurately describes the appeal proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/G4620/W/22/3306464 Main Issues 5. The main issues are the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on: • the future development of additional infrastructure for walking/cycling or junction improvement works; and • the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Future Development 6. The appeal site consists of a wide area of pavement situated at the junction of Harvest Road and Hurst Road. It is in a predominantly residential area and the wide pavement runs along Hurst Road, broken up in places with grass verges. 7. The Council’s Transportation Engineer has objected to the proposal on the basis that “the proposed location would obstruct any possible future development of additional infrastructure for walking/cycling or junction improvement”. However, no details of any planned junction improvement works are before me. Furthermore, no information or timescales for any alleged additional infrastructure for walking or cycling has been provided. Based on the evidence before me, I am therefore not convinced that the proposal would necessarily prejudice any future improvement works or additional infrastructure.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision There would remain a sufficiently wide unobstructed footway for pedestrian movement to not be significantly hindered. 8. A local resident has raised concerns regarding the ‘crashes and accidents’ on the existing road. However, no evidence has been presented to me to demonstrate that the existing highway or junction is inadequate or unsafe. The proposal would not significantly intrude on the sight lines of motorists travelling along either Hurst Road or Harvest Road. In the absence of other evidence to the contrary, I consider that the proposal would not cause harm to the safe and efficient operation of the highway. 9. In conclusion, there is no evidence that the siting of the proposal would prevent the future development of additional infrastructure for walking/cycling or junction improvement works. Character and Appearance 10. The appeal site is in close proximity to a number of streetlights, which are approximately 8 metres in height. There are also telegraph poles and mature trees close by. Therefore, vertical structures are common in the street scene. 11. The Council’s evidence is not clear in regard to their assessment of the impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision I note that the Officer’s report refers to the alternative siting of the proposal, stating that it would impact on the visual amenity of the area, to the detriment of the outlook of the surrounding residents. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the Council, local residents have objected to the proposal on the grounds of the visual impact of the siting and appearance of the proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision I note that the Officer’s report refers to the alternative siting of the proposal, stating that it would impact on the visual amenity of the area, to the detriment of the outlook of the surrounding residents. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the Council, local residents have objected to the proposal on the grounds of the visual impact of the siting and appearance of the proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/G4620/W/22/3306464 12. Based on the evidence before me, given the presence of the existing vertical structures in the streetscene, I am not of the view that the proposal would appear alien or unexpected in such a context. 13. Due to its height, the monopole would be visible from the surrounding residential properties. However, the relationship of the proposal with the closest residential properties would be at a slight angle due to the properties corner positions, which would help minimise the impact on the outlook for the occupiers of these properties. The wide pavement would also provide some relief between the proposal and the closest residential properties. Furthermore, the proposed monopole would have a relatively slim nature when viewed from the first-floor level of the closest properties and would be finished in grey, minimising its visual impact. The visual impact of the associated cabinets would also be mitigated by their grey finish and would be appropriately sited parallel with the edge of the highway. For all of these reasons, the proposal would not unacceptably harm the outlook of the surrounding properties. 14.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision In conclusion, the proposal would not appear overly prominent or visually intrusive and would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the area. Other Matters 15. Concerns have been raised about potential effects on health, particularly the proposed monopole’s proximity to residential properties. However, the appellant has provided a certificate to confirm that the proposal has been designed to comply with the guidelines published by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). In these circumstances, the Framework advises that health safeguards are not something which a decision-maker should determine. No sufficiently authoritative evidence has been provided to indicate that the ICNIRP guidelines would not be complied with or that a departure from national policy would be justified. Conditions 16. The Order does not provide any specific authority for imposing additional conditions beyond the deemed conditions for development by electronic communications code operators contained within it.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision These specify that the development must be carried out in accordance with the details submitted with the application, begin within 5 years of the date of the approval and be removed as soon as reasonably practicable after it is no longer required for electronic communications purposes and the land restored to its condition before the development took place. Conclusion 17. For the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed and prior approval is granted.

Page 3 · Chunk 11 Laura Cuthbert

HARVEST ROAD STREETWORKS, Harvest Road, Londonderry, Warley Sandwell, B67 6NG — Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council — Laura Cuthbert INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶10-14

The Inspector noted that vertical structures are common in the street scene, and that the proposed monopole would not appear alien or unexpected. The relationship of the proposal with the closest residential properties would be at a slight angle, minimising the impact on the outlook for the occupiers of these properties.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶15

The Inspector noted that the appellant has provided a certificate to confirm that the proposal has been designed to comply with the guidelines published by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

Highway safety
For appellant
¶7-8

The Inspector noted that no evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the existing highway or junction is inadequate or unsafe. The proposal would not significantly intrude on the sight lines of motorists travelling along either Hurst Road or Harvest Road.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
GPDO Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 February 2023 under the Open Government Licence.