Case 3305156

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE

Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
14 September 2023
Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Inspector
Westbrook J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
BT Telecommunications PLC
LPA reference
22/01602/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000021
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Lead
Start date
12 June 2023

Summary AI

The appeals were dismissed due to the proposed hub's impact on the character and appearance of the locality. The hub would be overly dominant and cluttered, causing harm to the walking environment and visual amenity. The benefits of the proposal do not outweigh the harm caused.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions Site visit made on 13 August 2023 by J D Westbrook BSc(Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 September 2023 Appeal A Ref: APP/Z5630/W/22/3305156 Pavement outside of 20 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QE • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by BT Telecommunications PLC against the decision of the Council of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames. • The application Ref: 22/01602/FUL, dated 28 April 2022, was refused by notice dated 8 July 2022. • The development proposed is described as the proposed installation of 1no. new BT Street Hub plus removal of associated BT kiosk(s). Appeal B Ref: APP/Z5630/W/22/3305157 Pavement outside of 20 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QE • The appeal is made under Regulation 17 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007 against a refusal to grant express consent. • The appeal is made by BT Telecommunications PLC against the decision of the Council of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames. • The application Ref: 22/01603/ADV, dated 28 April 2022, was refused by notice dated 8 July 2022.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions • The advertisement proposed is described as the installation of 2no. digital LCD display screens, one on each side of the BT Street Hub. Decisions 1. Appeal A and Appeal B are dismissed. Preliminary Matters 3. Appeal A relates to the refusal of planning permission for the proposed hub. Appeal B is in respect of refusal of advertisement consent for the LCD signage which would be an integral part of the proposed hub sought under Appeal A. I have considered both on their individual merits. However, to avoid repetition, I have dealt with the relevant issues concurrently. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions • The advertisement proposed is described as the installation of 2no. digital LCD display screens, one on each side of the BT Street Hub. Decisions 1. Appeal A and Appeal B are dismissed. Preliminary Matters 3. Appeal A relates to the refusal of planning permission for the proposed hub. Appeal B is in respect of refusal of advertisement consent for the LCD signage which would be an integral part of the proposed hub sought under Appeal A. I have considered both on their individual merits. However, to avoid repetition, I have dealt with the relevant issues concurrently. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions Appeal Decisions APP/Z5630/W/22/3305156 and APP/Z5630/W/22/3305157 Main Issue 6. The main issue in these cases is the effect of the proposal on the character, appearance and visual amenity of the locality. Reasons 7. Coombe Road is a busy commercial road and bus route with a wide range of shops and other commercial properties. It appears to have a medium to heavy pedestrian usage. The proposed hub would be sited on the pavement outside of No 20 Coombe Road. 8. The Council contends that the proposed hub would have an overly dominant appearance within the street scene, would detract from the walking environment along Coombe Road and would appear as clutter, resulting in an overcrowded appearance. It would also be an obstruction on the pavement, which would result in nuisance and inconvenience to pedestrians at times of busy usage of the footway. Finally, it has not been demonstrated the hub has been suitably designed to minimise energy consumption in the provision of its services. 9. With respect to Appeal A, the western side of Coombe Road, in the vicinity of the appeal site, has a restricted pavement width by virtue of cycle stands, a street lamp, a planter, a post box and a short term parking bay.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions Together, these effectively channel most of the pedestrian flow to that limited part of the pavement closest to the shop fronts. There is also some evidence of outdoor seating provision associated with cafes close to the appeal site which serves to further restrict free pedestrian flow. The proposed hub would be sited within one small area of relatively open pavement and would largely block free pedestrian circulation at a point where walkers could otherwise navigate around street furniture and café seating. 10. While the design of the hub would not, in itself, clash with the modern shop and café fronts in the vicinity, its scale and prominence would generate a more cluttered appearance to this section of the pavement along Coombe Road, where existing street furniture is still relatively small in scale and appears restrained. 11. With regard to the issue of energy consumption, the Council refers to policy S12 of the London Plan. However, this Policy would appear to relate to major developments and would not, therefore, be directly relevant to this case.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions I accept that there is no evidence provided to compare energy usage between the hub and the existing kiosks, but the hub would provide additional public services and would appear not to exceed the recommended standards for illumination of advertisements as set out in the Professional Lighting Guide of the Institute of Lighting Professionals. I consider this to be a consideration that is effectively neutral to the main issue in this case. 12. In the case of Appeal B, the same considerations apply with regard to the impact of the proposed hub on the character and appearance of this part of High Street. Given the siting of the hub and the scale of the advertisements on it, I consider that the hub would be highly prominent on this small open section of what is otherwise a relatively restricted area of pavement, and it would appear overly dominant in this setting. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions Appeal Decisions APP/Z5630/W/22/3305156 and APP/Z5630/W/22/3305157 Other Matter 13. The appellants have indicated that two kiosks would be removed from elsewhere in the wider area in conjunction with this proposal, and that this would represent a further benefit. I have little information about these additional kiosk removals, and the removals may well represent a benefit to these other locations. The additional benefit does not, however, directly affect the impact of the proposed hub at the appeal site, and I consider that any resultant benefits would not outweigh the harm caused by the proposal to the character and appearance of the area along this part of Coombe Road. Conclusions 14. For the above reasons, I find that the proposal would not preserve the character, appearance and visual amenity of the locality. It would not align with Policies D3 and D8 of the London Plan, and Policies CS8 and DM10 of the Council’s Core Strategy (CS), as they require well designed development to positively respond to the character of their locations. On this basis, I dismiss Appeal A. 15. For similar reasons, I find the proposal would not preserve the visual amenity of the locality.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decisions

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — Appeal Decisions It would therefore not be consistent with Policies CS8 and DM10 of the CS, insofar as they require development to protect the character, appearance and visual amenities of the public realm. On this basis, I dismiss Appeal B.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 J D Westbrook

Pavement o/s 20 Coombe Road, , New Maldon, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT3 4QE — Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames — J D Westbrook INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The proposed hub would have an overly dominant appearance within the street scene, detract from the walking environment, and appear as clutter, resulting in an overcrowded appearance.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶9-10

The proposed hub would block free pedestrian circulation at a point where walkers could otherwise navigate around street furniture and café seating, generating a more cluttered appearance.

Ecology and biodiversity
Neutral
¶11

The design of the hub would not clash with modern shop and café fronts, but its scale and prominence would generate a more cluttered appearance, and there is no evidence to compare energy usage between the hub and existing kiosks.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶12

The hub would be highly prominent on this small open section of what is otherwise a relatively restricted area of pavement, and it would appear overly dominant in this setting.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policies D3 and D8 of the London Plan, Policies CS8 and DM10 of the Council’s Core Strategy (CS)
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 September 2023 under the Open Government Licence.