Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW
Torridge District Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 18 January 2023
- Authority
- Torridge District Council
- Inspector
- White J
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Mr Mark Fisk
- LPA reference
- 1/0553/2022/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000046
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 14 October 2022
Summary AI
The appeal for a holiday rental shepherd's hut in the countryside was dismissed due to concerns over accessibility and sustainability. The proposal would encourage reliance on private cars and undermine the local plan's strategy for tourism accommodation.
PDF text
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 December 2022 by J White BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 18 January 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/W1145/W/22/3304065 Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford, Devon EX22 7XW • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Mark Fisk against the decision of Torridge District Council. • The application Ref 1/0553/2022/FUL, dated 24 May 2022, was refused by notice dated 27 July 2022. • The development proposed is described as “siting of a holiday rental shepherd's hut on the area where there used to be a polytunnel. This part of the land does not have any trees on it and is therefore the ideal area to site the hut. The hut would be suitable for couples holiday rental and would sleep two people. The land would only ever house a single unit making it a more desirable holiday rental.” Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matter 2. The address set out in the banner heading above is taken from the Planning Appeal Form as this more accurately describes the address of the appeal site. Main Issue 3.
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is whether the appeal site would provide an appropriate location for the proposed holiday accommodation, with particular regard to accessibility of services having regard to the policies set out in the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) that seek to restrict development in the countryside and minimise the need to travel by private car. Reasons 4. The site lies in a rural location adjacent to Powlers Piece Cross. The parcel of land comprises trees, with a clearing at its northwest end where an area of hardstanding lies off the gated access from the classified road. There is development, including houses within the vicinity, but they are dispersed and separated by gaps. 5. Parkham is a settlement more than two miles north of the site. In planning terms, the appeal site is situated outside any defined settlement and falls within the open countryside. In the countryside, the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan (the LP), seeks to control dispersed development, guarding against development in unsustainable locations. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W1145/W/22/3304065 6. Policy ST07 of the LP provides a spatial development strategy for Northern Devon’s Rural Area. The policy advises that amongst other things, in the countryside, development will be limited to that which is enabled to meet local economic and social needs, rural building reuse and development which is necessarily restricted to a countryside location. 7. There is no suggestion that the appeal site is related to an existing tourism, visitor or leisure attraction and the proposal would not reuse an existing building. As such, the scheme would fail to accord with Policy DM18 of the LP. 8. The local road network is subject to the national speed limit. Access to Parkham would be along roads, which are without pedestrian footway, steep in places and unlit. The length and nature of the roads are likely to limit the practicality of walking and cycling to access most day-to-day facilities especially at night and in poor weather conditions.
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision Whilst the appellant advises that the site would appeal to cyclists and horse riders, I have no substantive basis to consider that services would generally be accessible by means other than the private car and it is unlikely that residents of the proposed shepherd’s hut would frequently use sustainable transport modes to obtain access to essential goods, services and entertainment. 9. The appeal site, given the absence of realistic alternatives, would therefore most likely give rise to reliance on the private car for most journeys. I am mindful that paragraph 85 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) accepts that sites to meet local business and community needs in rural areas may have to be found adjacent to or beyond existing settlements. However, the Framework advises that in these circumstances it will be important to ensure that development exploits any opportunities to make a location more sustainable (for example by improving the scope for access on foot, by cycling or by public transport). This is not demonstrated by the proposal. 10.
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, when judged against LP policies, permitting the development would undermine the strategy for the distribution of tourism accommodation and it is likely that car borne travel would be encouraged. As such, the appeal site would not provide an appropriate location for the proposed holiday accommodation, with particular regard to accessibility of services having regard to the policies set out in the development plan and the Framework that seek to restrict development in the countryside and minimise the need to travel by private car. It would not be a sustainable form of tourism accommodation contrary to the requirements of policies ST07, ST13 and DM18 of the LP, which together seek to ensure that development proposals are suitably located for sustainable tourism. Other Matters 11. I acknowledge that some economic advantages would arise from the occupation of the shepherd’s hut through related visitor expenditure in the area, and related employment opportunities. However, the provision of one unit would make little meaningful difference and these benefits would be limited. 12. My attention has been drawn to the local support for the proposal.
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — Appeal Decision I also note that the site lies in an area with a low probability of flooding and outside of a https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Appeal Decision APP/W1145/W/22/3304065 Conservation Area. However, these are matters that do not outweigh the harm I have identified. Conclusion 13. The proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no material considerations identified which outweigh this finding. Therefore, for the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.
Land at Powlers Piece, East Putford , Devon, EX22 7XW — Torridge District Council — J White INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Green belt Against appellant ¶10
The appeal site is in the countryside and the development would undermine the strategy for the distribution of tourism accommodation and encourage car borne travel, contrary to policies ST07, ST13 and DM18 of the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan.
Ecology and biodiversity Neutral
The provision of one unit would make little meaningful difference and these benefits would be limited.
Flood risk For appellant ¶12
The site lies in an area with a low probability of flooding and outside of a Conservation Area.
External appearance Neutral
The inspector did not consider this issue in detail, but noted that the site lies in an area with a low probability of flooding and outside of a Conservation Area.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| ST07 |
Determinative |
| ST13 |
Substantial |
| DM18 |
Moderate |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 18 January 2023 under the Open Government Licence.