Case 3302074

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU

South Hams District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
3 March 2023
Authority
South Hams District Council
Inspector
Rose C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Ms Joanne Burgess
LPA reference
1844/21/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000044
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 November 2022

Summary AI

The application for a partial award of costs against South Hams District Council was dismissed due to lack of evidence that the Council's decision was unreasonable. The Inspector found that there had been a material change in planning policy since the consideration of the adjoining development, and that the circumstances of the two developments differed.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 17 January 2023 by C Rose BA (Hons) BTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 3rd March 2023. Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/K1128/W/22/3302074 Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton PL8 2AU • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Joanne Burgess for a partial award of costs against South Hams District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of the Council to grant planning permission for a new dwelling. Decision 1. The application for a partial award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Costs in this instance are being applied for on substantive grounds. 3. The applicant considers that the Council acted unreasonably by refusing planning permission for the first reason stated in the notice of decision.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision They consider the unreasonable behaviour to be on the basis that the proposal adjoins a development that the Council found acceptable in this regard. The applicant states that the circumstances of the two cases are similar with no material change in planning policy. 4. In response, the Council states that the two applications were three years apart and are substantially different with the adjoining proposal considered at a time when the Council did not have an adopted Local Plan or five-year supply of housing land, with more weight now attributed to policies that are formally adopted. As a result, there has been a material change in planning policy since their consideration of the adjoining development. 5. Since the Council considered the development on the adjoining site in 2019, the Plymouth and South West Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034 has been adopted along with the Brixton Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2034 being ‘made’. As a result of this and given that the Council can now demonstrate a five-year supply of housing land, there has been a change in planning policy and material considerations that, I have concluded, justify the Council’s decision.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision In addition, I have found in favour of the Council with regard to the assessment of the site’s accessibility to services and facilities. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU — South Hams District Council — Costs Decision In addition, I have found in favour of the Council with regard to the assessment of the site’s accessibility to services and facilities. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/K1128/W/22/3302074 6. Matters concerning an assessment of the proposal against relevant development plan policies and detailing the change of approach compared to the planning permission granted on the adjoining site were detailed in the Council’s officer report and statement of case. 7. In light of the above, I consider that the circumstances of the two developments differ. I also find that a material change in planning policy has occurred between consideration of the proposals that justifies a different approach regarding the location of the development in relation to services and facilities. 8. Accordingly, I conclude that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. 9. The application for a partial award of costs must fail.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 C Rose

Land North East of Hartlands, Lodge Lane, Brixton, PL8 2AU — South Hams District Council — C Rose INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶9

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the Council acted unreasonably in refusing planning permission, and the Inspector found that the circumstances of the two developments differed.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Plymouth and South West Devon Joint Local Plan 2014-2034
Determinative
Brixton Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2034
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 3 March 2023 under the Open Government Licence.