Case 3301768

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX

Rochford District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
8 March 2023
Authority
Rochford District Council
Inspector
Price A
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Miss C Hartshorn
LPA reference
21/01379/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000075
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
21 September 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to concerns about the potential impact of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring properties, specifically with regards to noise and disturbance. While the proposal would meet other planning policy objectives, the harm identified outweighed these benefits.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 21 February 2023 by A Price BSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8 March 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/B1550/W/22/3301768 4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh SS6 9NX • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Miss C Hartshorn against the decision of Rochford District Council. • The application Ref 21/01379/FUL, dated 30 December 2021, was refused by notice dated 18 May 2022. • The development proposed is the demolition of the existing garage and subdivision of the existing plot to provide a new single storey dwelling at the rear with associated development. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance. Reasons 3. The proposed development would be accessed via the existing and extended driveway that would run along the sides of 4 and 6 Mortimer Road. Parking spaces and a turning area would be positioned towards the end of the existing rear garden which would be subdivided. 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision The proposed access would serve only one dwelling. The position of the access, parking spaces and turning area at this site are such that the starting, manoeuvring and passing of cars would take place very close to the sides of Nos 4 and 6, including their side-facing windows and rear gardens. 5. Such activity would result in a greater and unacceptable level of disturbance than is currently the case. At present, the rear gardens in this location are peaceful with limited built form beyond the established building lines. The proposed change in relationship would be to the detriment of the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 4 and 6. Landscaping, including boundary treatments and the use of non-loose driveway materials, could assist in mitigating the effects of the proposed development. However, I have no clear evidence before me to demonstrate that this would sufficiently mitigate against noise and disturbance, even if this limited views of passing vehicles from side- facing windows and light spillage. Moreover, there is no certainty, or https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B1550/W/22/3301768 mechanism before me to ensure, that future occupants would use a quieter electric vehicle, even where a charging point is proposed. 6. The appellant sets out that a driveway already exists at present, and the use of permitted development (PD) rights forms a fallback position. Specifically, it is set out that domestic outbuildings could be erected on the appeal site without the need for planning permission. Evidence of a certificate of lawful development has been provided in support of this. Nevertheless, even were an outbuilding and extended vehicular access erected under PD, this would be ancillary to the main house and not associated with a standalone dwelling. Therefore, traffic movements in that case would not increase from those currently experienced from the existing drive. Consequently, there is no substantive evidence before me that demonstrates that the appellant could reasonably implement a similarly harmful scheme under their PD rights. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision Whilst the proposed development would undoubtably change the relationship between the appeal site and neighbouring properties along Eastview Drive, Hullbridge Road and 10 Mortimer Road, which back onto the existing rear garden, the proposed parking area would be positioned a considerable distance away from those properties. This would mean that there would be no unacceptably harmful impacts on the living conditions of the occupiers of those properties. However, the lack of harm in those respects does not overcome the harm identified above. 8. For the above reasons, I conclude that the proposed development would unacceptably harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to noise and disturbance, contrary to the relevant provisions of Policy CP1 of the Rochford Core Strategy Adopted Version (2011) and Policies DM1 and DM3 of the Rochford Development Management Plan (2014). These policies, amongst other objectives, seek to ensure that proposed development has a positive relationship with existing and nearby buildings in respect of living conditions.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision This is in a similar vein to the provisions of paragraph 130(f) of the National Planning Policy Framework, insofar as the provision of a high standard of amenity for existing users is concerned. Other Matters 9. The Council does not object to the principle of the proposed development. Based on the evidence before me and from my site visit, I have no reason to disagree with those findings. The proposal would assimilate to an acceptable standard with the surrounding area. 10. The proposed dwelling would meet a number of other planning policy objectives including in respect of its high-quality design, living conditions for future occupiers, trees, ecology and sustainable construction. The site would also contribute to the creation of one additional dwelling in the district, make efficient use of a windfall site in a sustainable location and introduce additional landscaping measures. 11. There would also be some temporary economic benefits of the development during the construction phase and longer-term benefits through increased support of local shops and services. However, these benefits, both individually and cumulatively, would inevitably be limited due to the scale and nature of the proposed development.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Appeal Decision APP/B1550/W/22/3301768 12. The highway authority does not object to the proposed development from a highway safety perspective and I note that pre-application advice was obtained prior to the submission of the planning application. Nevertheless, the lack of harm in that respect is essentially neutral in my assessment of the appeal and any pre-application advice would not be determinative. 13. The appellant has brought my attention to recent planning permissions at a number of sites, including at Ferndale Road, Rawreth Lane, London Hill and Plumberow Avenue. Only limited information has been provided in respect of those schemes. However, the characteristics of each site and location are different, not least in the case of London Road. In that case, there appears to have been a pre-existing driveway which extended well beyond the rear elevation of properties. The case at Ferndale Road relates to an outbuilding. The case at Plumberow Avenue includes the demolition of an existing property. 14.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — Appeal Decision Even where there are similarities between sites, including at Rawreth Lane in respect of distances to neighbouring properties, the existence of that scheme is not reason to automatically accept a harmful development at the appeal site. Ultimately, I have considered the proposed development on the evidence before me and my observations on site, and those other cases have not led me to conclude differently on the main issue. Conclusion 15. For the reasons above, and having had regard to the development plan as a whole and all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal is dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 A Price

4 Mortimer Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9NX — Rochford District Council — A Price INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed development would result in a greater and unacceptable level of disturbance than is currently the case, with cars passing close to the sides of Nos 4 and 6, including their side-facing windows and rear gardens.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶7

The lack of harm in this respect does not overcome the harm identified in paragraph 5.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy CP1 of the Rochford Core Strategy Adopted Version (2011)
Determinative
Policies DM1 and DM3 of the Rochford Development Management Plan (2014)
Determinative
Paragraph 130(f) of the National Planning Policy Framework
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 March 2023 under the Open Government Licence.