Case 3300970

Valmar Stores, 50 Valmar Avenue, STANFORD-LE-HOPE, SS17 0NF

Thurrock Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
9 January 2023
Authority
Thurrock Borough Council
Inspector
Wood T
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Sanjayan Selvarasa
LPA reference
22/00080/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000034
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
28 November 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the development's unacceptable visual effect on the area's character and appearance. It was considered to be poor design, and its placement in a prominent position made it contrary to local policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Valmar Stores, 50 Valmar Avenue, STANFORD-LE-HOPE, SS17 0NF — Thurrock Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 12 December 2022 by Tim Wood BA(Hons) BTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 9 January 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/M1595/W/22/3300970 50 Velmar Avenue, Stanford-Le-Hope, Essex SS17 0NF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Sanjayan Selvarasa against the decision of Thurrock Borough Council. • The application Ref 22/00080/FUL, dated 19 January 2021, was refused by notice dated 20 April 2022. • The development proposed is the erection of structure to front of shop to provide covered shopping area. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 3. The proposal relates to this small shop which is located in a small parade of commercial properties, within an otherwise mainly residential area. The parade is identified by the Council as a Smaller Neighbourhood parade.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Valmar Stores, 50 Valmar Avenue, STANFORD-LE-HOPE, SS17 0NF — Thurrock Borough Council — Appeal Decision The terrace of 3 properties is constructed of brick elevations, with tiled roofs and are of a similar scale to the surrounding residential properties. 4. The development has already been undertaken and consists of a timber frame and plastic sheeting structure at the front of the shop. It spans the full width of the property and the plans indicate that it is 2.7m in depth. 5. The appearance of the structure and the materials used do not match any of the features of the existing building or those of its neighbours. Its design and appearance are rudimentary and the choice of materials heightens this effect. It appears as an obvious addition to the terrace which fails to harmonise with it. I strongly disagree with the appellant’s statement which suggests that it is a high quality of design. It sits within this prominent position and has a significantly detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the area. 6. The appellant indicates that the development seeks to make the best use of the land by providing additional room for the shop. In my judgement, any benefits in this respect are far outweighed by its unacceptable effect on the area. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Valmar Stores, 50 Valmar Avenue, STANFORD-LE-HOPE, SS17 0NF — Thurrock Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M1595/W/22/3300970 Conclusion 7. The development has a clear and unacceptable visual effect on the character and appearance of the area. It represents poor design and is placed in a prominent position. For these reasons, it is contrary to Policies CSTP22 and PMD2 of the Core Strategy. I consider that there are no matters which outweigh that conflict. As a consequence, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 T Wood

Valmar Stores, 50 Valmar Avenue, STANFORD-LE-HOPE, SS17 0NF — Thurrock Borough Council — T Wood INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5

The development's design and materials did not match the existing building or its neighbours, and it appeared as an obvious addition that failed to harmonise with the terrace.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The development had a clear and unacceptable visual effect on the area, representing poor design and being placed in a prominent position.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
CSTP22 and PMD2
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 January 2023 under the Open Government Licence.