Case 3298617

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ

Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
10 October 2022
Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Inspector
Griffiths S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor retail and services
Appellant
Mr Arben Jahja
LPA reference
21/4452/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000027
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
1 August 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a rear pergola structure at the Vesuvio Restaurant was dismissed due to its overbearing and visually intrusive impact on neighbouring residential occupiers, in breach of policy LP8 of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Local Plan.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ — Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 27 September 2022 by Sian Griffiths BSc(Hons) DipTP MScRealEst MRTPI MRICS an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 10th October 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/L5810/W/22/3298617 Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, Twickenham TW2 5NJ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Arben Jahja against the decision of Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council. • The application Ref 21/4452/FUL, dated 27 December 2021, was refused by notice dated 1 April 2022. • The development proposed is retention and amendment of existing rear pergola including reduction in scale. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matters 2. During the determination of the application, the description of development was slightly amended by the council to better reflect what is being proposed. I have used the description on the decision notice for clarity. Reasons 3. The main issue is the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. 4. The Vesuvio Restaurant (the appeal property) is situated within a terrace of commercial properties, some with residential flats above.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ — Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — Appeal Decision The properties have rear garden areas which have access through the ground floor premises or with rear access. 5. The block is an attractive 2-2.5 storey block set behind a substantial paved sections of terrace which allow external seating, planters and landscaping. The appeal property has a substantial pergola covering the seating area to the front. 6. The rear garden area of Vesuvio is currently occupied almost entirely by a glazed, enclosed pergola structure, which is unauthorised. There is a small area between the rear access to the restaurant and the entrance to the structure. The remaining area is surrounded by a substantial close-boarded fence. There is no landscaping around the structure. The roof is glazed, but at the site visit it was covered by what appeared to be a retractable cover. 7. Policy LP8 (Amenity and Living Conditions) (para 3) of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Local Plan (2018) (LP) states that ‘The council will… https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ — Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/L5810/W/22/3298617 ensure that proposals are not visually intrusive or have an overbearing impact as a result of their height, massing or siting’. 8. At the site visit, I noticed there were a number of first and second floor windows of adjacent residential flats directly overlooking the pergola structure. 9. I note from the officer’s report that the use of the garden area by restaurant customers is ‘not restricted by planning condition and would not in breach of planning control.’ However, it is my view that the use of such a garden area for occasional outside seating (weather permitting) would be a very different prospect to the creation of a permanent, large, enclosed structure to facilitate year-round usage by restaurant guests. 10. The appellants have attempted to mitigate the impact of the pergola by proposed the reduction to the size of the structure and proposed a small area of landscaping beyond. The overall height of the structure would remain the same. Given the location of the landscaping, it is unlikely that neighbouring occupiers would be able to see it.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ — Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — Appeal Decision Overall, I consider the scale of the reduced structure would not significantly improve what is a poor outlook of a substantial structure from neighbouring residential rear windows. 11. To that end, I consider the proposed reduced scheme would be overbearing and visually intrusive to neighbouring residential occupiers, resulting in harm to living conditions and offence to policy LP8. Conclusions 12. For the reasons given and having regard to all other matters raised, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Sian Griffiths

Vesuvio Restaurant, 208 Hampton Road, TWICKENHAM, TW2 5NJ — Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council — Sian Griffiths INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶10

The appellants' proposed reduction to the size of the structure would not significantly improve the poor outlook of a substantial structure from neighbouring residential rear windows.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶11

The proposed reduced scheme would be overbearing and visually intrusive to neighbouring residential occupiers, resulting in harm to living conditions and breach of policy LP8.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
LP8 (Amenity and Living Conditions)
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 10 October 2022 under the Open Government Licence.