Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ
Mid Devon District Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 4 January 2023
- Authority
- Mid Devon District Council
- Inspector
- Spencer-Peet A
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Halcyon Care
- LPA reference
- 20/01458/FULL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000042
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 11 July 2022
Summary AI
The application for an award of costs was allowed due to the Council's unreasonable behaviour in refusing the appeal, despite advice from professional officers that the issue was acceptable. The development plan policies were found to be in favour of the proposed extension, and the Council's lack of evidence to substantiate their reason for refusal was deemed sufficient to justify the award of costs.
PDF text
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 29 November 2022 by A Spencer-Peet BSc(Hons) PGDip.LP Solicitor (Non Practicing) an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 04 January 2023 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Y1138/W/22/3298329 Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon EX16 6SJ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Halcyon Care for a full award of costs against Mid Devon District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the erection of single storey extension to care home. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance (the PPG) advises that, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may only be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary expense in the appeal process. 3.
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision The PPG states that awards against local planning authorities may be either procedural, in respect of behaviour in relation to the appeal process, or substantive, which relates to the planning merits of the appeal. In this instance, the Applicant is seeking an award of costs in relation to substantive matters. 4. The PPG includes examples of unreasonable behaviour by planning authorities that may give rise to a substantive award of costs. Amongst other things, this can include, “preventing or delaying development which should clearly be
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision The PPG states that awards against local planning authorities may be either procedural, in respect of behaviour in relation to the appeal process, or substantive, which relates to the planning merits of the appeal. In this instance, the Applicant is seeking an award of costs in relation to substantive matters. 4. The PPG includes examples of unreasonable behaviour by planning authorities that may give rise to a substantive award of costs. Amongst other things, this can include, “preventing or delaying development which should clearly be | permitted having regard to its accordance with the development plan national | | --- | | policy and any other material considerations” and “failure to produce evidence | | to substantiate each reason for refusal on appeal” |
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision | permitted having regard to its accordance with the development plan national | | --- | | policy and any other material considerations” and “failure to produce evidence | | to substantiate each reason for refusal on appeal” | 5. The submissions confirm that the Council decided to refuse the application contrary to the initial advice of their professional officers. Whilst Local Planning Authorities are not bound to accept the recommendations of their officers, as noted above the PPG provides that Councils are at risk of an award of costs if they prevent or delay development which should clearly be permitted or fail to produce evidence to substantiate each reason for refusal. 6. As will be seen form the Appeal Decision, I have concluded that the development proposed would accord with the policies of the development plan. The appeal scheme would not result in a significant increase in traffic movements or increase bedroom numbers at the care home, and it appears https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/Y1138/W/22/3298329 that the proposed extension to the care home would not result in the loss of any dedicated parking space at the premises. 7. Whilst photographic evidence of some car parking use for an area to the front of the care home, had been provided in support of the Council’s case, there is no evidence before me which confirms that that space was restricted for vehicle parking use under previous planning permissions, for example by reference to plans or planning conditions attached to such permissions. As such, it does not appear that the Council has provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the contention that there would be a loss of a parking space at the premises, or that the scheme, which is the subject of the appeal, would create a severe impact on the highway network. 8. As such, I find that the Council has failed to substantiate their reason for refusal, in the face of advice from its professional officers that the issue with regards to parking and impact on the highway network was acceptable.
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — Costs Decision For the reasons above and for the reasons set out in the appeal decision, the proposed development accords with the policies of the development plan and I conclude that the Applicant has incurred unnecessary expense in making the appeal. Conclusion 9. For the reasons outlined above, I conclude that the Council has acted unreasonably, and that the Applicant has incurred unnecessary and wasted expense in the appeal process. Accordingly, a full award of costs is justified in this instance. Costs Order 10. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mid Devon District Council shall pay to Halcyon Care the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision, such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. 11. The Applicant is now invited to submit to Mid Devon District Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.
Ashdowne Care Home, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 6SJ — Mid Devon District Council — A Spencer-Peet INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶5
The Council's decision to refuse the application contrary to the initial advice of their professional officers was considered unreasonable, as it could lead to a substantive award of costs under the Planning Practice Guidance.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶7
The lack of evidence provided by the Council to substantiate their reason for refusal regarding the loss of a parking space was deemed sufficient to justify the award of costs.
Planning obligations Against appellant ¶8
The Council's failure to substantiate their reason for refusal was seen as a breach of the Planning Practice Guidance, which may give rise to a substantive award of costs.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Planning Practice Guidance |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 January 2023 under the Open Government Licence.