Case 3297977

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS

Durham County Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
28 November 2022
Authority
Durham County Council
Inspector
Walker R
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr & Mrs James and Anne Horn
LPA reference
DM/19/03819/FPA
ONS LPA code
E06000047
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
16 May 2022

Summary AI

Costs application refused as applicants failed to demonstrate unreasonable behaviour by Durham County Council. Decision based on National Planning Practice Guidance.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS — Durham County Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 1 September 2022 by Mr R Walker BA HONS DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 28 November 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/X1355/W/22/3297977 Greenhills Farm Cottage, Greenhills Farm, Wheatley Hill, Durham DH6 3QS • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr & Mrs James and Anne Horn for a full award of costs against Durham County Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for construction of two detached dormer dwellings (revised application). Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Paragraph 0301 of the National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may only be awarded against a party which has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS — Durham County Council — Costs Decision Paragraph 0512 of the PPG states that awards against appellants may be either procedural in regard to behaviour in relation to completing the appeal process or substantive, which relates to the planning merits of the appeal. 3. The applicants outline several points as to how they consider the Council to have behaved unreasonably. However, the applicants do not elaborate, as to how they consider the Council to have behaved unreasonably in relation to the individually listed points. Moreover, it will be seen from my decision that I have, in the main, agreed with the Council on the substantive matters of the appeal. 4. The applicants indicate that wasted expense has included unnecessary reports and unnecessary delays losing the business potential income. However, the applicants do not quantify what reports they consider were unnecessary and why. Moreover, in dismissing the appeal and finding harm, and conflict with the Development Plan, it is unclear to me what reports were unnecessary even though I have not found in favour with the appeal. As outlined above, any wasted expense is limited to expense in the appeal process and would not, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, relate to any potential business income. 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS — Durham County Council — Costs Decision Given my conclusions in the appeal decision, the Council has not delayed development which should clearly be permitted, having regard to its 1 Reference ID: 16-030-20140306 2 Reference ID: 16-051-20140306 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS — Durham County Council — Costs Decision Given my conclusions in the appeal decision, the Council has not delayed development which should clearly be permitted, having regard to its 1 Reference ID: 16-030-20140306 2 Reference ID: 16-051-20140306 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/X1355/W/22/3297977 accordance with the development plan, national policy, and any other material considerations. Overall, on the evidence before me, the Council’s consideration of the planning application or its appeal submissions, has not led to wasted expense in the appeal. 6. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated. Accordingly, I determine that the costs application should fail, and no award is made.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Mr R Walker

Greenhills Farm Cottage, (from Gowland House to B1289 Salters Lane Junc), Wheatley Hill, Durham, DH6 3QS — Durham County Council — Mr R Walker INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶4

Applicants failed to quantify unnecessary reports and why they were unnecessary.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

Council did not delay development and did not cause unnecessary expense.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶6

Unreasonable behaviour not demonstrated by Council, costs application refused.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPG 0301
Determinative
NPPG 0512
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 28 November 2022 under the Open Government Licence.