Case 3297262

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA

Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
21 December 2022
Authority
Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Caine M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr & Mrs Howard Gregory
LPA reference
13010/22
ONS LPA code
E08000001
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
7 July 2022

Summary AI

A costs decision was made in favor of Mr & Mrs Gregory, who had appealed against Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council's failure to issue a decision on a planning application within the prescribed period. The Council's unreasonable behavior, including delays and lack of communication, led to the appellants incurring unnecessary expense in mounting the appeal.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 6 September 2022 by Mark Caine BSc (Hons) MTPL MRTPI LSRA an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 December 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/N4205/W/22/3297262 Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton BL7 9HA • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr & Mrs Gregory for a full award of costs against Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for planning permission for the erection of four dwellings. Decision 1. The application for a full award of costs is allowed. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. The application was not determined by the Council.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision The PPG stipulates that, if it is clear the LPA will fail to determine an application within the time limits, it should give the applicant a proper explanation. Additionally, in any appeal against non-determination, the local planning authority should explain their reasons for not reaching a decision within the relevant time limit. 4. A further example of unreasonable behaviour within the PPG is where a Council has refused to enter into pre-application discussions, or to also provide reasonably requested information, when a more helpful approach would probably have resulted in either the appeal being avoided altogether, or the issues to be considered being narrowed, thus reducing the expense associated with the appeal. 5. It is evident from the submissions before me that the planning application subject to this appeal, and the previously withdrawn planning application before it, have been the subject of a protracted period of determination. I appreciate that the Covid-19 lockdowns would have caused unexpected delays and I have some sympathy in respect of the health of the planning officer and their subsequent sickness leave.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision However, the applicants’ evidence substantiates that they had endeavoured to contact the Council a number of times, over a long period of time, in order to provide necessary information. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision However, the applicants’ evidence substantiates that they had endeavoured to contact the Council a number of times, over a long period of time, in order to provide necessary information. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/N4205/W/22/3297262 6. The lack of a response from the Council resulted in the first application being withdrawn over a year after being validated. This significant delay, and the lack of a Council pre-application service, forced the applicants to resubmit an application to enable them to submit a ‘non determination’ appeal if the Council failed to determine it within the statutory timeframe. The second application was subsequently also not determined within the statutory timeframe. 7. The other stated pressures on the Council’s resources to fulfil the obligation to determine the planning applications one way or another are acknowledged and are regrettable. However, the determination process is not linear and much of what the Council has alleged is not extraordinary. It should have been capable of much swifter action. 8. Furthermore, comments from the GMEU were only received at appeal stage, resulting in the applicants incurring further delay and costs to address these through the submission of revised evidence.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision There is little evidence before me of any attempts by the Council to chase up a consultation response from the GMEU during the course of the determination of either of the planning applications. 9. Notwithstanding the outcome of the appeal, the submitted chronology of events surrounding the appeal proposal demonstrates that unnecessary consequences for this appeal arose from clear deficiencies in collaboration, communication and also timeliness on the Council’s part. 10. I therefore find that the Council has acted unreasonably and that the appellants’ expense in mounting the appeal has been unnecessarily incurred. As such a full award of costs is justified. Costs Order 11. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council shall pay to Mr & Mrs Gregory, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision. 12. The applicants are now invited to submit to the Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching an agreement as to the amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Costs Decision

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision In the event that the parties cannot agree on the amount, a copy of the guidance note on how to apply for a detailed assessment by the Senior Courts Costs Office is enclosed.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Mark Caine

Land off Cox Green Road, Egerton, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL7 9HA — Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council — Mark Caine INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶3

The Council failed to determine the application within the time limits, despite being advised to provide a proper explanation.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶6

The lack of a response from the Council resulted in the first application being withdrawn, causing significant delay and unnecessary expense for the appellants.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶8

The Council failed to chase up a consultation response from the GMEU, resulting in further delay and costs for the appellants.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶9

The Council's deficiencies in collaboration, communication, and timeliness led to unnecessary consequences for the appeal.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
PPG
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 December 2022 under the Open Government Licence.