Case 3297252

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB

London Borough of Barnet — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
13 January 2023
Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Inspector
Aqbal M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Domino Ltd
LPA reference
21/6073/PNZ
ONS LPA code
E09000003
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
2 August 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed as the proposed replacement building did not meet the definition of a 'block of flats' under Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the GPDO. The Inspector considered the principal characteristic of a block of flats to be the horizontal division of self-contained accommodation, which was not present in this case.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 17 November 2022 by M Aqbal BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 January 2023 Appeal Ref: APP/N5090/W/22/3297252 60A Purley Avenue, Brent, London NW2 1SB • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval required under Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). • The appeal is made by Domino Ltd c/o Audley Property against the decision of London Borough of Barnet. • The application Ref 21/6073/PNZ, dated 12 November 2021, was refused by notice dated 25 January 2022. • The development proposed is notification for prior approval for demolition of existing building and construction of residential apartment block to provide 5 residential flats (C3). Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary matter 2. The application form I have been provided has been redacted. Therefore, for the purposes of my Decision, I have taken the site address, appellants name and details of the proposal from the covering letter with the application, dated 12 November 2021. Background and Main Issue 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision The appeal building comprises a former industrial unit with a cleared area for parking at the front of the site. 4. Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)(‘GPDO’) sets out that development is classed as permitted development if it consists of works for the demolition of one or other of (a)any building comprising a single purpose-built detached block of flats, and(b) any other single detached building, comprising premises established (i)for office use falling within Class B1(a) of the Schedule to the 1987 Order, (ii)for research and development falling within Class B1(b) of the Schedule to the 1987 Order, or (iii)for an industrial process falling within Class B1(c) of the Schedule to the 1987 Order, or for any combination of them, existing on 12 March 2020, together with its replacement by a single building covered by sub- paragraph (2), involving operations listed in sub-paragraph (3). (2) The building in question is to comprise one or other of (a) a purpose-built detached block of flats, or (b)a purpose-built detached dwellinghouse. 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision This is subject to a number of situations where such development is not permitted, listed under paragraph ZA1 of the GPDO, and, subject to compliance https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision This is subject to a number of situations where such development is not permitted, listed under paragraph ZA1 of the GPDO, and, subject to compliance https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/22/3297252 with conditions, as set out under paragraph ZA2 of the GPDO. The Council has not raised any issues in respect of paragraphs ZA1 or ZA2 of the GPDO and I have no reasons to disagree. 6. In this case, the Council has raised an issue in relation to the proposed replacement building, which needs to comprise a purpose-built detached block of flats, or a purpose-built detached dwellinghouse. There is no disagreement between the main parties that the replacement building would not be a purpose-built detached dwellinghouse. 7. Accordingly, the main issue is whether the proposed development would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the GPDO, with regard to whether or not the replacement building comprises a purpose-built detached block of flats. Reasons 8. There is no definition or interpretation of a ‘block of flats’ under Class ZA of the GPDO. As such, this is matter of planning judgement for the decision maker to decide whether, as a matter of fact and degree the proposal comprises a block of flats. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Nevertheless, the Council has referred me to the interpretation for the purposes of Part 20 of the GPDO, as set out in the Town and Country Planning (Permitted Development and Miscellaneous Amendments) (England)( Coronavirus) Regulations 2020. This states that: block of flats "means a building which is divided horizontally and consists of separate and self-contained premises constructed for use for the purposes of a dwellinghouse, and any ancillary facilities constructed solely for use by occupiers of the building". In the absence of any other definition, I have had regard to this in determining this appeal. 10. The proposed scheme incorporates a single point of shared access into the development and includes communal facilities, such as shared refuse storage and parking areas to the front of the building. There is also a shared cycle storage area. However, it is not uncommon for other types of developments, such as a small scheme of houses to have shared recycling storage facilities and communal parking. Hence, whilst I acknowledge that communal facilities are common for blocks of flats, they are not exclusive to, or determinative of this type of development. 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Moreover, in my judgement, the principal and defining characteristic for a block of flats is the horizontal division of self-contained accommodation, constructed for use for the purposes of a dwellinghouse. In contrast, the proposed scheme is arranged as a row of individual dwellinghouses, laid out so that each property is over 2 or 3 floors, with the individual dwellinghouses divided vertically. Each dwellinghouse has its own private garden to the rear and its own front door accessed from ground floor level. As such, the proposed arrangement is more akin to a terrace of dwellings than a block of flats. 12. Therefore, the replacement building does not comprise a purpose-built detached block of flats. As such, the proposal would not be permitted development under the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the GPDO. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/22/3297252

Page 3 · Chunk 8 INSPECTOR

60A Purley Avenue, London, NW2 1SB — London Borough of Barnet — INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶9

The Council referred the Inspector to the definition of a 'block of flats' under the Town and Country Planning (Permitted Development and Miscellaneous Amendments) (England)(Coronavirus) Regulations 2020.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶10

The proposed scheme incorporates communal facilities, but these are not exclusive to or determinative of a block of flats.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶11

The proposed arrangement is more akin to a terrace of dwellings than a block of flats, as it consists of individual dwellinghouses with private gardens and front doors.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶12

The replacement building does not comprise a purpose-built detached block of flats, so the proposal would not be permitted development under the GPDO.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA of the GPDO
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 January 2023 under the Open Government Licence.