Case 3297186

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD

Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
8 December 2022
Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Inspector
Wilkinson F
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor retail and services
Appellant
Poundplus
LPA reference
21/01534/FULL
ONS LPA code
E06000010
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
3 October 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a canopy to a retail unit on Holderness Road, Hull, was dismissed due to the inspector's conclusion that the canopy harmed the character and appearance of the host property and area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD — Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 29 November 2022 by F Wilkinson BSc (Hons), MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8 December 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/V2004/W/22/3297186 275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull HU8 8TD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr H Badori of Poundplus against the decision of Hull City Council. • The application Ref 21/01534/FULL, dated 25 October 2021, was refused by notice dated 13 January 2022. • The development is retrospective application for a canopy to front of retail unit. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The canopy has been constructed. I have determined the appeal on this basis. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and area. Reasons 4. The appeal property is located within the Holderness Road District Centre. It fronts onto Holderness Road. The ground floor is in retail use.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD — Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — Appeal Decision While noting the changes that have taken place to the frontages of the buildings along Holderness Road, including to the ground floor of the property, its upper storey retains attractive window details which add some visual interest to the building. 5. The canopy comprises a substantial steel frame and steel corrugated roof that runs across the width of the property. It is attached to the property by a number of quite large steel supports that extend from the fascia. I appreciate that the canopy provides cover for the retail goods that are stored outside the shop as well as an additional display area. Such a feature would not necessarily be out of keeping with the character and appearance of this predominantly retail area, and I observed a small number of canopies at premises nearby. 6. However, the canopy that has been constructed has a crude appearance, reinforced by the materials that have been used and the method of attachment to the building. Due to its positioning and scale, extending across the width of the building, the canopy and the steel supports that attach it to the property are prominent in views along Holderness Road from both directions for quite a distance.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD — Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — Appeal Decision Overall, while appreciating that traditional shop fronts are no longer readily apparent in the vicinity, the canopy is nevertheless an incongruous https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD — Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — Appeal Decision Overall, while appreciating that traditional shop fronts are no longer readily apparent in the vicinity, the canopy is nevertheless an incongruous https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/V2004/W/22/3297186 structure which draws the eye and detracts from the character and appearance of the host property and street scene. It fails to support the delivery of the high-quality environment sought by Policy 14 of the 2017 adopted Hull Local Plan 2016 to 2032 (the Local Plan). 7. I therefore conclude that, due to its design and materials, the canopy significantly harms the character and appearance of the host property and area. Accordingly, it conflicts with Policy 14 of the Local Plan, which sets out the criteria important in ensuring the design of development meets the vision and objectives of the city, including the relationship between the development and the surrounding built form in terms of character, detailing and materials. Conclusion 8. The development conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole. There are no material considerations worthy of sufficient weight that would indicate a decision other than in accordance with it. Therefore, for the reasons given, the appeal should not succeed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 F Wilkinson

275 - 277 Holderness Road, Hull, HU8 8TD — Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council — F Wilkinson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The inspector considered the canopy to be incongruous and detract from the character and appearance of the host property and street scene.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The inspector found the canopy's design and materials to significantly harm the character and appearance of the host property and area.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy 14 of the 2017 adopted Hull Local Plan 2016 to 2032
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 December 2022 under the Open Government Licence.