Case 3297120

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX

Herefordshire Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
28 November 2022
Authority
Herefordshire Council
Inspector
Reed D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Miss Lisa Moxley
LPA reference
P212407/f
ONS LPA code
E06000019
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
2 August 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a new outbuilding near Whitehall, Chapel Lane, Peterchurch was dismissed due to conflict with development plan policies. The proposal would have an unduly adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area and would be unacceptable and in conflict with policies for residential development.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 18 October 2022 by David Reed BSc DipTP DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date:28th November 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/W1850/W/22/3297120 Whitehall, Chapel Lane, Peterchurch HR2 0RX • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by J Olley and L Moxley against the decision of Herefordshire Council. • The application Ref 212407, dated 16 June 2021, was refused by notice dated 19 January 2022. • The development proposed is the demolition of an existing derelict outbuilding and the construction of a similar new outbuilding close to the same location, for family use and occasional use as a small holiday let. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issues are: • the principle of the development; and • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Principle of the development 3. The proposal is for the demolition of a small outbuilding and the construction of a replacement one bedroom detached outbuilding for family or holiday let use a short distance behind Whitehall, a two-storey cottage on Chapel Lane.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — Appeal Decision The site lies well outside the Peterchurch Settlement Boundary where Policy P1 of the Peterchurch Neighbourhood Plan 2017 (PNP) resists new housing and Policy RA3 of the Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy 2015 (HLP) precludes residential development unless at least one of seven criteria are met. None directly applies to this proposal, the most relevant being the sustainable reuse of a redundant or disused building. However, in this case the existing building would be demolished and a new building constructed further away from Whitehall, on rising ground and towards the open countryside. 4. The new building would comprise a large double bedroom on the first floor and a bathroom, sitting room and kitchen/dining room on the ground floor. Whilst the building would provide additional accommodation suitable for family use in conjunction with the main dwelling, it would contain all the facilities necessary for independent use and indeed is also intended as a holiday let. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W1850/W/22/3297120 5. HLP Policy E4 seeks to promote sustainable tourism and new accommodation to increase the number of visitors staying overnight whilst Policy RA6 supports tourism development in rural areas provided it is of a scale commensurate with its location and setting. However, in this case the proposal would be seen as effectively an independent dwelling, albeit small and near an existing property, at the end of a lane with some scattered housing. The proposal in this location would thus be contrary to policy for residential development and, if considered as tourism development, not commensurate with its location and setting. 6. For these reasons the principle of the development would be unacceptable and in conflict with PNP Policy P1 and HLP Policies RA3 and RA6. These resist new housing outside the defined settlement boundary and, notwithstanding the generalised support for more accommodation offered by HLP Policy E4, tourism development that is not commensurate with its location and setting. Character and appearance 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — Appeal Decision Whilst still a compact building with its discreet first floor bedroom utilising the roof space, the new structure would have a significantly larger footprint and slightly higher ridge than the existing outbuilding and would be sited further east along the lane in the open land behind Whitehall. This would extend the existing group of buildings on Chapel Lane towards the open countryside and whilst well screened from the north by a tall hedge along the lane it would have wide views across the valley to the south and thus would be clearly apparent in the landscape. The building would be of suitable materials, reused local stone with slate roof, and would replace the existing building, an old caravan, shed and other paraphernalia, but the site could be tidied up in any event. 8. Overall, the proposal would have an unduly adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area contrary to PNP Policy P6 and HLP Policy LD1. These protect the scenic beauty of the area and the setting of settlements, also ensuring that site selection is influenced by the landscape. Other matters 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — Appeal Decision The proposal would be within walking distance of Peterchurch, a village with a range of services and facilities suitable for some housing, albeit not by a road with footpaths or street lighting. With much tourism to Herefordshire probably car based, the location would not be unsustainable in itself, and when used as an annex to the main house would not generate significant extra traffic. The appellant draws attention to a recent permission for holiday accommodation at nearby Pontypinna Farm, but the circumstances of each site are different. Conclusion 10. The proposal would provide improved accommodation for family use and when used as a holiday let would support local tourism with economic benefits for the area. However, these material considerations would be outweighed by the in- principle objection and the significant harm to the character and appearance of the area resulting in conflict with the development plan. 11. Having regard to the above the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 David Reed

Whitehall, Peterchurch, HEREFORD, HR2 0RX — Herefordshire Council — David Reed INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶3

The site lies well outside the Peterchurch Settlement Boundary and none of the criteria in Policy RA3 of the Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy 2015 apply to this proposal.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The new building would have a significantly larger footprint and slightly higher ridge than the existing outbuilding, and would be sited further east along the lane in the open land behind Whitehall.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
PNP Policy P1
Determinative
HLP Policy RA3
Determinative
HLP Policy RA6
Substantial
PNP Policy P6
Determinative
HLP Policy LD1
Determinative
HLP Policy E4
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 28 November 2022 under the Open Government Licence.