Case 3294163

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG

Sevenoaks District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
14 July 2022
Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Inspector
Bayliss G
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Miss F Hobbs
LPA reference
21/02692/CONVAR
ONS LPA code
E07000111
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
14 April 2022

Summary AI

The Inspector dismissed the appeal, as the proposed variation of Condition 5 would fundamentally conflict with the description and extent of the original planning permission.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by G Bayliss BA (Hons) MA MA MRTPI IHBC

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — by G Bayliss BA (Hons) MA MA MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 July 2022

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald TN14 6NG

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald TN14 6NG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the Act) against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Miss F Hobbs against the decision of Sevenoaks District Council. • The application Ref 21/02692/CONVAR, dated 16 August 2021, was refused by notice dated 30 December 2021. • The application sought planning permission for the Change of Use from Agriculture to Private Equestrian Use, 30 x 60 metre Outdoor Riding Arena, 20 metre diameter Lunge Pen, and Winter Turn-Out Area 14 x 20 metres without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref. SE/18/00039/FUL, dated 19 March 2018. • The condition in dispute is No.5 which states that: “The sand school hereby permitted shall not be used for any commercial purposes, including providing riding lessons, equestrian shows, gymkhana events or hunter trials/cross country events”.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald TN14 6NG

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald TN14 6NG • The reason given for the condition is: “So that any other proposal is the subject of a separate planning application, to be determined on its merits, having regard to the impact on the Green Belt, landscape and any highway implications in accordance with Policies EN1 and LT2 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan and Policies SP1 and LO8 of the Sevenoaks Core Strategy and the advice and guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework”.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/G2245/W/22/3294163 Reasons 4. Relevant advice is set out in the Planning Practice Guidance ‘Flexible Options for Planning Permissions’. This explains1 that there is no statutory definition of a ‘minor material amendment’ but it is likely to include any amendment where its scale and/or nature results in a development which is not substantially different from the one which has been approved. The guidance makes it explicit2 that section 73 cannot be used to change the description of development. 5. Finney v Welsh Ministers & Others [2019] EWCA Civ 1868 (Finney) sets out that a Section 73 application may not be used to obtain planning permission that would require a variation to the ‘operative’ part of the planning permission, in other words, the description of development for which planning permission has already been granted. It follows from Finney that where amending a condition would result in a conflict between the new condition and the description of development, then that particular amendment is beyond the powers under section 73 and cannot be made. 6.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. Having regard to the principles of the Finney judgement, the original permission was specific in allowing only private equestrian use and, from that, Condition 5 stated that the use of the sand school should not be used for any commercial purpose. The reason for that condition clearly stated that, amongst other things, any other proposal would need to be the subject of a separate planning application and determined on its merits having regard to the impact on the Green Belt, landscape and any highway implications. 7. The proposed variation of Condition 5 seeks to predominantly retain the use of the sand school for private use but to allow riding lessons subject to limits on numbers, frequency and logging their use. Although the application does not specifically mention that this will be a commercial activity, and it is stated that the appellant has no intention to pursue their own commercial interests, the evidence before me indicates that the intention is to allow some commercial activities in the form of ancillary local community riding lessons.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. To this end the revised wording of the condition would allow external persons to visit the site and use the existing sand school in a capacity that would relate to a commercial equestrian use. 8. This would be a fundamental alteration of the development already approved and permit a material change of use of the existing sand school, beyond the scope of what was previously considered acceptable, and likely to result in changes to the character and nature of the use. Setting aside any merits to the changes, the proposals would result in a discrepancy with the description of development and, were I to allow them, there would be a knock-on-effect altering the terms of the original planning permission. 9. Whilst no new buildings or other physical development are proposed, the appeal scheme would represent a material change of use and therefore constitute development under section 55 of the Act. I recognise that the appellant intends to primarily use the facility for personal use but also wishes to allow local riders to benefit from it.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. However, even if the suggested use is carried out to the limited extent described by the appellant, the proposed 1 Reference ID: 17a-017-20140306 2 Reference ID: 17a-014-20140306 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 8 originally granted.

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — originally granted. However, even if the suggested use is carried out to the limited extent described by the appellant, the proposed 1 Reference ID: 17a-017-20140306 2 Reference ID: 17a-014-20140306 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2 Appeal Decision APP/G2245/W/22/3294163 variation of condition would fundamentally conflict with the description and extent of the original planning permission. 10. The proposal therefore cannot be considered as a minor material amendment under section 73 of the Act. The effect is to dismiss the appeal, although it is open to the appellant to apply for planning permission for a revised development. To permit the variation proposed under this appeal would fail to accord with the principles set out in Finney. The appeal must therefore be dismissed on that ground, and without any consideration of the substantive planning matters that arise. In this case, those that relate to development in the Green Belt. Conclusion 11. For the reasons set out above, I dismiss this appeal.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 G Bayliss

Moorcroft Farm, Hale Oak Road, Sevenoaks Weald, TN14 6NG — Sevenoaks District Council — G Bayliss INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶9-10

The proposed variation of Condition 5 would result in a material change of use and constitute development under section 55 of the Act, fundamentally conflicting with the description and extent of the original planning permission.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶11

The appeal must therefore be dismissed on that ground, and without any consideration of the substantive planning matters that arise.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
EN1 and LT2 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan and Policies SP1 and LO8 of the Sevenoaks Core
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 July 2022 under the Open Government Licence.