Case 3293901

2a Rossefield Road, Bradford, BD9 4DD

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
12 May 2022
Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Inspector
Baxter C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Mr Abdul Abdul Hameed
Agent
3indesign Ltd
LPA reference
21/06311/FUL
ONS LPA code
E08000032
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
7 March 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposal's adverse impact on the living conditions of future flat occupants, specifically in terms of outlook and light. The proposal would provide inadequate levels of living standards and would be contrary to the Bradford Core Strategy Development policy.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

2a Rossefield Road, Bradford, BD9 4DD — City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 26 April 2022 by Chris Baxter BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12 May 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/W4705/W/22/3293901 2a Rossefield Road, Bradford BD9 4DD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Abdul Hameed against the decision of City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council. • The application Ref 21/06311/FUL, dated 21 December 2021, was refused by notice dated 2 February 2022. • The development proposed is described as “change of use to lower ground floor to self contained flat”. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The address of the site in the banner heading above is taken from the appeal form. 3. At my site visit, I was able to gain access to the property and I undertook an internal inspection, as well as making external observations of the property and its surroundings. Main Issue 4. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of the flat with regards to outlook and light. Reasons 5. The proposal would utilise the existing window and door openings.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

2a Rossefield Road, Bradford, BD9 4DD — City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council — Appeal Decision The windows would be small and given the size of these windows, the proposed bedroom and living room would not receive substantial amounts of natural light. The kitchen would not have any windows and therefore receive limited natural light. As the appeal property is set below ground level, the outlook from the proposed windows would be restricted. 6. Due to the scale and position of the proposed windows, the rooms of the flat would have an oppressive feel that have limited amounts of natural light and outlook. The proposal would therefore provide inadequate levels of living standards for future occupiers of the flat. 7. Accordingly, the proposal would have a harmful effect on the living conditions on future occupiers of the flat with regards to outlook and light. The proposal would be contrary to Policy DS5 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

2a Rossefield Road, Bradford, BD9 4DD — City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/W4705/W/22/3293901 Plan Document 2017 and Homes and Neighbourhoods: A Guide to Designing in Bradford which seeks development to not harm the amenity of prospective users and residents. Conclusion 8. The proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations, including the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework, which outweigh this finding. 9. Therefore, for the reasons given above, the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Chris Baxter

2a Rossefield Road, Bradford, BD9 4DD — City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council — Chris Baxter INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶6

The proposal would result in rooms with an oppressive feel and limited natural light, leading to inadequate living standards for future occupiers.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy DS5 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 May 2022 under the Open Government Licence.