Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ
North East Derbyshire District Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Authority
- North East Derbyshire District Council
- Inspector
- Jones D
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Paul Pollard
- LPA reference
- 21/01100/FL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000038
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 19 April 2022
Summary AI
The application for costs against North East Derbyshire Council was refused. The Inspector found that the Council's failure to provide an appeal statement did not result in wasted expense or delay.
PDF text
Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ — North East Derbyshire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 21 June 2022 by David Jones BSc (Hons) MPlan MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 09 August 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/R1038/W/22/3292176 Land south of Quarry Farm, Freebirch, Eastmoor, Chesterfield S42 7DQ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Paul Pollard for a full award of costs against North East Derbyshire Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for a building for storage including; land maintenance equipment, office, reception, health and safety briefing area and picnic shelter in association with Freebirch Quarry Clay Pigeon Shoot, as well as the wider landholding. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may only be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.
Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ — North East Derbyshire District Council — Costs Decision The applicant is seeking a full award of costs against the Council in relation to alleged unreasonable behaviour in failing to provide a statement of case to defend its position. In particular, the applicant states that this led to him being no clearer about the Council’s reasons for refusal leading to wasted expense in pursuing the appeal. The PPG makes it clear that a local planning authority is at risk of an award of costs if they fail to produce evidence to substantiate each reason for refusal. In this instance, the Council’s case has had to be considered in relation to the Officer Report at the application stage as no appeal statement has been prepared. 4. The Officer Report clearly sets out the Council’s case including reciting the relevant paragraphs of the National Planning Policy Framework which relate to development within the Green Belt, and the relevant adopted local planning policies. The report also clearly sets out how the Council concluded that the proposed building would, in their view, adversely affect the openness of the Green Belt and represent inappropriate development.
Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ — North East Derbyshire District Council — Costs Decision Sufficient information was presented within the Officer Report for the applicant to be clear on the Council’s main concerns in relation to the appeal. 5. Furthermore, the failure to submit an appeal statement did not result in any wasted expense, as by that stage the appeal had already been made by the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ — North East Derbyshire District Council — Costs Decision Sufficient information was presented within the Officer Report for the applicant to be clear on the Council’s main concerns in relation to the appeal. 5. Furthermore, the failure to submit an appeal statement did not result in any wasted expense, as by that stage the appeal had already been made by the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/R1038/W/22/3292176 applicant. The Council’s failure to provide an appeal statement also did not result in any delay being caused to the appeal process. 6. Although an appeal statement was not submitted, this does not mean that the Council has acted unreasonably by only substantiating its reasons for refusal in the Officers Report. I conclude that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the PPG, has not been demonstrated.
Land south of Quarry Farm Freebirch, Eastmoor, CHESTERFIELD, S42 7DQ — North East Derbyshire District Council — David Jones INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Green belt For appellant ¶3
The applicant alleged that the Council's failure to provide a statement of case was unreasonable and caused unnecessary expense.
Green belt Against appellant ¶4
The Inspector found that the Council's Officer Report clearly set out its case and the relevant policies, making it clear to the applicant why the proposed building would be inappropriate in the Green Belt.
External appearance For appellant ¶5
The applicant claimed that the Council's failure to submit an appeal statement resulted in wasted expense, but the Inspector found that this did not occur.
External appearance Against appellant ¶6
The Inspector concluded that the Council did not act unreasonably by only substantiating its reasons for refusal in the Officer's Report.
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 August 2022 under the Open Government Licence.