Case 3291631

Land off Fox Lane, Barnburgh, DN5 7ET

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
24 August 2022
Authority
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Rafiq F
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Simon Askew
Agent
Urbana Town Planning
LPA reference
21/01016/FUL
ONS LPA code
E08000017
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
25 March 2022

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against Doncaster Council was refused, as the inspector found that the Council's decision was reasonable and justified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land off Fox Lane, Barnburgh, DN5 7ET — Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 24 May 2022 by F Rafiq BSc (Hons) MCD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24 August 2022 Costs application in relation to APP/F4410/W/22/3291631 Land off Fox Lane, Doncaster DN5 7ET • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Simon Askew for a full award of costs against Doncaster Council. • The application sought planning permission for the erection of a detached dwelling without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 19/00986/FUL dated 12 February 2020. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded where a party has behaved unreasonably, and the unreasonable behaviour has caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. The type of behaviour that can lead to a costs award includes substantive matters such as unreasonably refusing a planning application. 3. The appellant has stated that the Council failed to make a balanced decision based on the evidence provided.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land off Fox Lane, Barnburgh, DN5 7ET — Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council — Costs Decision It is evident though from the Council’s Delegation Report and subsequent Statement of Case, that they considered the evidence put forward, including the Computer-Generated Image’s provided by the appellant. The assessment contained within the Council’s written evidence sets out their reasoning in relation to the development plan and provides a justification for its decision. Although there is a reliance on Conservation Officer’s consultation response, given the site is in a Conservation Area, I do not consider it unusual that significant weight was placed on the advice provided by this consultee. Conclusion 4. With the above in mind, I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has not been demonstrated. An award of costs is therefore not justified in this instance.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 F Rafiq

Land off Fox Lane, Barnburgh, DN5 7ET — Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council — F Rafiq INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶4

The inspector found that the appellant failed to demonstrate unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 24 August 2022 under the Open Government Licence.