Case 3290815

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA

Northumberland County Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
22 March 2022
Authority
Northumberland County Council
Inspector
Cragg D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Ms Jenny Freeman
Agent
Design Workshop Ltd
LPA reference
21/01840/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000057
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
21 January 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a planning permission to replace timber cladding with new natural cedar boarding and to change the balustrade to glazed and patio size as built was dismissed. The inspector concluded that the proposed development would detract from the character and appearance of the host property and the area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA — Northumberland County Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 8 March 2022 by Diane Cragg Dip TP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 22 March 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/P2935/W/22/3290815 The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill NE67 5HA • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Jenny Freeman against the decision of Northumberland County Council. • The application Ref 21/01840/FUL, dated 4 May 2021, was refused by notice dated 30 September 2021. • The development proposed is replacement of timber cladding with new natural cedar boarding. Change of balustrade to glazed and patio size as built. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The application was refused by the Council against Officer’s recommendation but there is no statement before me to explain the Council’s position. Nevertheless, in the absence of anything substantive from the Council there are third party representations which, along with the appellant’s submissions, I have had regard to in reaching my decision. 3. I saw at my site visit that works to extend the first-floor balcony have been undertaken. Main Issue 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA — Northumberland County Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area. Reasons 5. The appeal site is located on the south side of the main road through Ellingham. There is a mixture of dwelling designs within the vicinity of the appeal site. Properties are mostly constructed of stone or render with some wood cladding visible. Stone boundary walls, post and rail fencing, and hedging generally demarcate boundaries. The limited range of materials to properties and boundaries is an attractive part of the character and appearance of the area. 6. The appeal building is a two-storey structure with a small footprint. It is a prominent building when approaching the appeal site from the east. It is also visible in wider views from the road to the south and from adjacent residential properties. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA — Northumberland County Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/P2935/W/22/3290815 7. The elevated balcony projects out from the side and rear of the building. The opaque glass panels and steel tubular framing of the balcony balustrade jars with the wooden handrail of the stairs, the wood cladding of the appeal building and the stone of the adjacent properties and boundary walls. Because of its raised position, prominence and modern materials, the balcony balustrade is a particularly prominent and incongruous feature and looks harmfully out of place. 8. The appellant describes modern details proposed in the design of the village hall. As described, these features would sit within the building’s elevations or roof form. In contrast, the balcony is at a raised level and set forward of the building’s elevations. The proximity and design of the village hall does not lead me to a different conclusion on the balcony detail. 9. Although, when constructed, the approved dwelling to the rear of the appeal site may limit views of the balcony from the road to the south, views of it from the east, adjacent residential properties and the village hall site would remain prominent. 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA — Northumberland County Council — Appeal Decision The balustrade around the balcony at Bridge Cottage is not prominent because it is formed of frameless clear glass. The balcony detail at Bridge Cottage does not set a precedent for the appeal proposal. 11. Overall, I conclude that the proposed development would detract from the character and appearance of the host property and the area, in conflict with Policy F4 of the Berwick-upon-Tweed Borough Local Plan adopted April 1999, where in intermediate areas of landscape value development should accord with its surroundings including in terms of materials and means of enclosure. This is consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework which seeks to achieve well-designed places. Other Matters 12. The Council does not raise any concerns about the access and parking arrangements, cedar cladding, or the living conditions of adjacent residents in relation to the balcony extension and I see no reason to disagree on these matters. Conclusion 13. For the reasons given above, I conclude that overall, the proposal conflicts with the development plan, and there are no material considerations that would outweigh that conflict. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Diane Cragg

The Signal Box, Farley Cottage, Ellingham, Chathill, NE67 5HA — Northumberland County Council — Diane Cragg INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The balcony balustrade is a particularly prominent and incongruous feature that jars with the surrounding materials.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The proximity and design of the village hall does not lead to a different conclusion on the balcony detail.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶9

Views of the balcony from the east, adjacent residential properties, and the village hall site would remain prominent, detracting from the character and appearance of the area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶11

The proposed development would detract from the character and appearance of the host property and the area, in conflict with Policy F4 of the Berwick-upon-Tweed Borough Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy F4 of the Berwick-upon-Tweed Borough Local Plan
Determinative
National Planning Policy Framework
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 22 March 2022 under the Open Government Licence.