Case 3290714

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF

North Devon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
20 June 2022
Authority
North Devon District Council
Inspector
Rennie S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr & Mrs S Tuson
Agent
Planning Partnership Ltd
LPA reference
73624
ONS LPA code
E07000043
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
15 March 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for a single dwelling on a small plot in a residential area was dismissed due to its potential impact on the character and appearance of the area, despite the need for housing in the area and the lack of a 5-year housing land supply.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 17 May 2022 by Mr S Rennie BSc (Hons), BA (Hons), MA, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20th June 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/X1118/W/22/3290714 35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr & Mrs S Tuson against the decision of North Devon District Council. • The application Ref 73624, dated 16 June 2021, was refused by notice dated 24 September 2021. • The development proposed is for a dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The application is in outline with all matters reserved. Where there are details of aspects of the proposal, I have generally considered them to be indicative only. 3. The Council confirms that reason for refusal No 6, relating to the Braunton Burrows Special Area of Conservation, has been addressed with submission of a mitigation payment to the Council. Main Issues 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision The main issues are the effect of the development on (1) the character and appearance of the area; (2) the living conditions of future occupiers and neighbours to the site; (3) highway safety; and (4) provision of biodiversity net gain. Reasons Character and Appearance 5. The proposed dwelling is set within a residential area, which is characterised by detached dwellings (often bungalows but some with two storeys) set within modest sized plots. 6. The proposal is for a detached dwelling, indicated to be a bungalow style but with accommodation in the roof space, set on what is an area of garden which narrows and tapers towards the western end. It is in a prominent location adjacent to the highway. The site is currently a garden area for the occupants of No 35A The Brittons, which itself appears as a dwelling introduced since the street was built, to the side of No 35. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1118/W/22/3290714 7. Although many of the properties within this streetscene and surrounding areas appear to have mainly modest sized plots, they are often of a regular size and appear larger than the appeal site. This is especially the case when considering that the area to the east of the dwelling would be used as a shared driveway/parking area with No 35A. 8. In my view, a dwelling on this tight plot would appear cramped within this setting. This is evidenced by the small garden indicated on the proposed layout plan. Also, the site of the proposed dwelling is what appears to be the main garden area of No 35A, even if it is towards the front of this dwelling and therefore lacking privacy. There is a yard area to the side of No 35A but this is small. 9. Furthermore, to comply with the Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) the dwelling may need to be increased in size, but this would only exacerbate the issue of the cramped layout. However, as the appellant sets out, this is an outline proposal and the dwelling could be designed to meet the NDSS requirements, even without an increase in size over that indicated.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Nonetheless, even as indicated, the proposed small dwelling would appear cramped on this plot, resulting in an incongruous addition within the streetscene. This would have adverse impacts to the character and appearance of the street, especially with the proposed house in such a prominent position. 10. There may be other similar developments in the wider area, but I have considered the proposal primarily on the visual impacts it would have to the prevailing street scene character and this context, where the dwelling would be most visible. 11. For these reasons the proposal would be contrary to the criteria of policies DM04 and BRA of the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan (LP). These policies require development to be of a good design which is appropriate and sympathetic to setting in terms of scale and density, for example. 12. The proposal would also conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) which requires that decisions should ensure developments are visually attractive as a result of good architecture, layout and appropriate and effective landscaping (Paragraph 130).

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision A dwelling in the location proposed would not appear visually attractive due primarily to the cramped layout within this context. Living Conditions 13. As mentioned above, the proposal would reduce the garden area serving No 35A considerably, meaning only a small area of amenity space remaining. Whilst this is an indication of a cramped form of development, the amenity space remaining would be usable and relatively private for the occupants of No 35A and so this in itself is not a reason to dismiss the appeal. 14. Furthermore, as this is an outline proposal with only indicative details I would consider it possible that a dwelling could be designed and built on the plot without being significantly harmful to any existing neighbour through overlooking impact or some other form of impact. This includes the occupants of No 35A. 15. For these reasons, at this outline stage, the proposal accords with policies DM01 and DM04 of the LP, which requires that development should not https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1118/W/22/3290714 significantly harm the amenities of any neighbouring occupiers, amongst other things. Parking and Highway Safety 16. The proposal would result in a single car parking space for both the proposed dwelling and the existing dwelling at No 35A. Whilst this is less than many other dwellings in the area, this is an accessible location and not a long distance from the centre of Braunton. 17. It could be that the parking provision on-site would result in some on-street parking, but from my observations this is a street which has the capacity for some on-street parking if necessary. There is no substantive evidence to the contrary, although I do accept that the on-street parking could be busier at times of the day when I was not on site, such as in the evening. Nonetheless, it is my conclusions that the parking provision in this particular circumstance is acceptable. 18. There is no turning space available within the site, given the restricted size of the plot. However, it is apparent that this is a common arrangement within The Brittons and I have no detailed evidence as to highway safety issues this has caused.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision As such, I do not consider that the lack of on-site turning results in adverse highway safety implications. 19. On the issue of parking and turning the proposal broadly accords with policies DM04, DM05 and DM06 of the LP. These policies require that development provides safe and appropriate highway access and provides an appropriate scale and range of parking provision to meet anticipated needs, amongst other things. Biodiversity 20. The proposed dwelling would be set within a restrictive sized plot, though the plans do not suggest the removal of significant levels of vegetation for instance. There is also, from the evidence submitted and my own observations of the site, unlikely to be much in the way of biodiversity value being lost if the proposals were implemented. 21. In terms of biodiversity net gain, whilst the amount of landscaping possible would be limited some could be achieved. Furthermore, as set out by the appellant, the likes of bat and bird boxes could be required via condition to achieve this net gain. 22.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision On this matter the proposal accords with policies ST14 and DM08A of the LP, with these policies requiring development to enable net gains by designing in biodiversity features and enhancements where possible, for example. Planning Balance 23. The Council has acknowledged that it cannot demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply. Paragraph 11 of the Framework sets out that decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development and that, under criterion d) where the policies which are most important for determining the application are out of date, planning permission should be granted unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/X1118/W/22/3290714 Given the lack of a five year housing land supply, paragraph 11 d) of the Framework is engaged. 24. The proposal would provide a dwelling towards the local housing supply in an accessible residential area. I note also the need for housing which is affordable for people in Braunton, with it possible the proposed dwelling could provide a home for a family member. There would be economic benefits from the construction of the dwelling, and the appellant suggests this could be considered an efficient use of the site, amongst other potential benefits. I also have seen all the representatives in favour of the development. 25. Being that the proposal is for a single dwelling only I would give modest weight to the cumulative benefits. 26. However, the harm to the character and appearance of the area as identified would be significant. When assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole the adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. Therefore, the proposal would not be a sustainable form of development. The conflict with the development plan is not outweighed by other considerations including the Framework. Conclusion 27.

Page 4 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Appeal Decision For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 10 Mr S Rennie

35A The Brittons, Braunton, EX33 2HF — North Devon District Council — Mr S Rennie INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶9-12

The proposed dwelling would appear cramped within the setting and result in an incongruous addition, having adverse impacts to the character and appearance of the street.

Living conditions
Neutral
¶14

The proposal would reduce the garden area serving No 35A, but this would not be a significant harm to existing neighbours.

Parking
For appellant
¶16-18

The proposal would result in a single car parking space, which is an accessible location, and would not have adverse highway safety implications.

Other
For appellant
¶20-22

The proposal would not result in significant loss of biodiversity value, and could achieve biodiversity net gain through landscaping and condition.

Other
Against appellant
¶23-26

The harm to the character and appearance of the area would outweigh the benefits of the proposal, despite the need for housing in the area and the lack of a 5-year housing land supply.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
DM04, BRA of the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan (LP)
Determinative
National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
Substantial
ST14, DM08A of the LP
Moderate
DM01, DM04, DM05, DM06 of the LP
Limited

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 June 2022 under the Open Government Licence.