Case 3290131

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ

Sevenoaks District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
10 October 2022
Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Inspector
Dade E
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Ms Tracy Gee
LPA reference
21/00882
ONS LPA code
E07000111
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
3 May 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the living conditions of nearby residents, specifically daylight and sunlight. The inspector found that the development would cause a significant loss of daylight and overshadowing effect, breaching the Council's adopted Residential Extensions SPD and Policy EN2 of the Allocations and Development Management Plan. Although the proposal would contribute to the area's housing needs, the substantial adverse impacts outweighed the benefits.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 September 2022 by E Dade BA (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 10 October 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/G2245/W/22/3290131 1C Wickenden Road, Sevenoaks, TN13 3PJ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Ms Tracy Gee against the decision of Sevenoaks District Council. • The application Ref 21/00882, dated 19 March 2021, was refused by notice dated 19 November 2021. • The development proposed is a two storey 3 bedroomed dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 1 Nursery Close, with particular regard to daylight and sunlight. Reasons 3. No 1 is a detached dwelling which neighbours the appeal site, occupying a corner plot at the junction of Nursery Close and Wickenden Road. The side elevation of No 1 is close to the appeal site’s side boundary, separated only by a narrow garden path. At the ground floor of No 1’s side elevation are two windows serving the kitchen/diner and a large window serving the garden room. 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — Appeal Decision The proposal would involve the construction of a two-storey dwelling to adjoin No 1c Wickenden Road at a part of the site currently occupied by single-storey side projections. The proposed dwelling’s side elevation would be close to and run parallel with the site’s side boundary. 5. From my visit to the appeal site and No 1, which I carried out at late morning on a bright and sunny day, it was clear that the side windows of the kitchen/diner provide the main source of daylight to this room. The appellant’s statement suggests that No 1’s kitchen/diner also benefits from daylight entering at the rear via the garden room. However, the garden room is separated from the kitchen/diner by a solid dividing wall which prevents daylight entering the kitchen/diner from the rear. 6. Due to the sloping topography of the area, the ground level of No 1 is slightly elevated above the appeal site with the top section of the ground floor windows protruding above the height of the appeal site’s existing single storey projections. The presence of a two-storey dwelling projecting alongside No 1 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/G2245/W/22/3290131 would significantly reduce the amount of daylight available to the ground floor windows at the kitchen/diner and garden room and would have an overshadowing effect through obstructing sunlight during the morning period. 7. The proposed development would therefore breach the guidelines relating to overshadowing and loss of light, set out in the Council’s adopted Residential Extensions Supplementary Planning Document, 2009 (SPD), which indicate that proposals should not cause any significant loss of daylight or the cutting out of sunlight for a significant part of the day to habitable rooms including kitchen/diners. 8. Consequently, the proposed development would cause substantial harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of No 1 Nursery Close with particular regard to daylight and sunlight. For these reasons, the proposal would conflict with Policy EN2 of the Allocations and Development Management Plan (2015) which indicates that development should not be permitted where the proposal would result in an unacceptable loss of light for occupiers of nearby properties. Other Matters 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — Appeal Decision The Council accepts it is unable to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites and states it has a supply of only 2.9 years. This is a significant shortfall against the housing requirement. In the absence of a five- year land supply, paragraph 11(d)ii. of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) should be applied which states that permission should be granted unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole. 10. The proposal would contribute to the area’s housing needs through the addition of one dwelling, as supported by paragraph 60 of the Framework. However, this modest increase in the supply of dwellings would make little difference to the overall supply of housing. Conversely, paragraph 130 requires new development to create a high standard of amenity and not undermine quality of life. Consequently, the substantial adverse impacts I have identified in respect of living conditions would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole. Conclusion 11.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — Appeal Decision The proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations, including the provisions of the Framework, which outweigh this finding. Therefore, for the reasons given, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 E Dade

1C Wickenden Road, SEVENOAKS, TN13 3PJ — Sevenoaks District Council — E Dade INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶5

The proposed development would significantly reduce the amount of daylight available to the ground floor windows at the kitchen/diner and garden room, and would have an overshadowing effect through obstructing sunlight during the morning period.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶7

The proposed development would breach the guidelines relating to overshadowing and loss of light, set out in the Council's adopted Residential Extensions SPD.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶8

The proposed development would cause substantial harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of No 1 Nursery Close with particular regard to daylight and sunlight.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy EN2 of the Allocations and Development Management Plan (2015)
Determinative
Paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework
Substantial
Paragraph 11(d)ii. of the National Planning Policy Framework
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 10 October 2022 under the Open Government Licence.