Case 3290039

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES

Watford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
14 July 2022
Authority
Watford Borough Council
Inspector
Staddon P
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre
LPA reference
21/01279/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000103
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
6 April 2022

Summary AI

The appeal for the retention of an infill canopy at The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre was allowed, subject to a condition. The Inspector found that the design of the proposal respected local character and was not in conflict with policy UD1 of the Watford Local Plan Core Strategy 2006-31 or paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 June 2022 by P J Staddon BSc, Dip, MBA (Distinction), MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14th July 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/Y1945/W/22/3290039 The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD WD25 0ES • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Hashim Nawrozzadeh against the decision of Watford Borough Council. • The application Ref 21/01279/FUL, dated 20 August 2021, was refused by notice dated 10 December 2021. • The development proposed is ‘retention of an infill canopy with front entrance doors.’ Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the retention of an infill canopy with front entrance doors at The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, Watford, WD25 0ES, in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 21/01279/FUL, dated 20 August 2021, subject to the following condition: 1) The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following drawings: 205NA/01; 205NA/02; 205NA/03; and 205/NASP. Preliminary matters 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision The drawings submitted with the application are not entirely representative of the detail of the buildings I observed on my site inspection, as there are a number of window openings on the former church and No. 207 North Approach which are not shown on the plans. However, as the appeal proposal relates to development already carried out, and the drawings appear to accurately reflect the new works, I am satisfied that I have sufficient information to assess and determine the appeal. Main issue 3. The main issue is the effect of the design of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Character and appearance 4. The appeal site includes the former Kingswood Baptist Church and a residential property, No. 207, on North Approach in Watford. It is within the built-up area and about 2 miles to the north of the town centre. The former church is now https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Y1945/W/22/3290039 occupied by The Imam Hussein Foundation and I understand that the house is occupied by its religious leader. 5. The main building is of a simple but attractive traditional design, being constructed in brickwork with a hipped tiled roof. The front wall contains a feature entrance porch and a number of windows and includes a parapet feature, giving it a height comparable with the front wall of the 2-storey house (No. 207) to its south-west, which appears to be of a later construction. The house is of a simple design, constructed in brickwork with a pitched roof. The place of worship and the house are set back from North Approach behind a forecourt and garden. There is a row of traditional bay fronted semi-detached houses running north-eastwards from the site, and a primary school to the south-west. There is a belt of trees opposite the appeal site which screens views of the A405 beyond. The area has a suburban and primarily residential character and appearance. 6. There is a gap between the place of worship and No. 207 North Approach. This gap has been filled with a canopy structure which is rectangular in shape and, I am informed, measures 6.7 metres wide by 15.8 metres in length1.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision The front of the canopy is constructed in timber and this spans the gap between the 2 buildings. This timber structure includes some doors and a series of infill panels which are formed of decorative fretwork backed with glass. When I visited, the timberwork appeared to have been recently stained. 7. Although the canopy is relatively large, it is not be prominent in any public view and appears intended to serve a purpose related to the use of the place of worship. With regard to the front elevation, the top of the structure sits well below the height of the parapet wall of the place of worship and below the cill level of the first floor window of No. 207, such that it is subservient to each and not imposing. The gates and timber work appear to have been improved and finished with a dark staining since Watford Borough Council’s (the Council) decision, and I assessed the appearance to be neat and acceptable and not out of character with the adjacent buildings or the character of the surrounding area. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision On the main issue, I therefore find no conflict with policy UD1 of the Watford Local Plan Core Strategy 2006-31 (adopted 2013) and paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which require developments to be of an appropriate standard of design that, amongst other matters, respects local character. Other matters 9. I have noted and considered the views of interested parties concerning the canopy and wider matters relating to the site, including alleged further development at the site and the suggestion that the intention is to fully enclose the sides of the canopy to create a function room. However, my consideration is limited to the specific planning merits of the appeal proposal, as defined in the submitted plans and documents. Other matters, outside and beyond this scope, fall to be considered, as may be appropriate, by the Council. 1 Figures cited in the Appellant’s Design and Access Statement https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/Y1945/W/22/3290039 Conditions 10. A planning condition listing the approved drawings is necessary to provide certainty and clarity. The Council suggested a further condition requiring the timberwork at the front of the canopy to be stained within one month. However, as the timberwork has now been stained to an acceptable standard, such a condition is not necessary. Conclusion 11. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed subject to the condition set out in paragraph 1 of this decision.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 P. Staddon

The Imam Hussein Foundation Centre, 205 North Approach, WATFORD, WD25 0ES — Watford Borough Council — P. Staddon INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶4

The Inspector noted that the appeal site has a suburban and primarily residential character and appearance, and that the canopy is not prominent in public views.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶7

The Inspector found that the canopy sits well below the height of the parapet wall of the place of worship and is subservient to each, making it not imposing.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
UD1 of the Watford Local Plan Core Strategy 2006-31
Moderate
paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 July 2022 under the Open Government Licence.