Case 3288076

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL

Guildford Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
24 August 2022
Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Inspector
Rafferty C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
Mr W Gong
LPA reference
21/P/02055
ONS LPA code
E07000209
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
23 December 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed as the inspector found that removing condition 3 would not result in unacceptable harm to neighbouring occupiers by way of overlooking.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by C Rafferty LLB (Hons), Solicitor

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — by C Rafferty LLB (Hons), Solicitor an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24th August 2022

Page 1 · Chunk 1 32 Queen Eleanors Road, Guildford GU2 7SL

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — 32 Queen Eleanors Road, Guildford GU2 7SL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a grant of planning permission subject to conditions. • The appeal is made by Mr W Gong against the decision of Guildford Borough Council. • The application Ref 21/P/02055, dated 29 September 2021, was approved on 30 November 2021 and planning permission was granted subject to conditions. • The development permitted is Variation of Condition 2 (plans) relating to Planning Application 17/P/01885 allowed at Appeal on 09/05/2018, including changes to fenestration, and the addition of solar panels and 2 light tubes. • The condition in dispute is No. 3, which states that the rooflights on the main dwelling which serve the loft room in the East and West elevations of the development hereby approved shall be glazed with obscure glass and permanently fixed shut, unless the parts of the windows which can be opened are more than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which the window is installed and shall thereafter be permanently retained as such. • The reasons given for the condition is in the interests of residential amenity and privacy

Page 1 · Chunk 2 the east, a two storey detached dwelling.

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — the east, a two storey detached dwelling. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 the east, a two storey detached dwelling.

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — the east, a two storey detached dwelling. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/Y3615/W/21/3288076 5. Planning permission was granted at the site subject to numerous conditions, including that the rooflights on the east and west elevations of the appeal property would be fitted with obscured glazing and permanently fixed shut, unless more than 1.7 metres above the floor. This was in the interests of residential amenity and privacy. The rooflights have now been fitted. 6. The properties are situated close together, with little separation distance between the respective side elevations. As such, it is possible that a degree of overlooking of the neighbouring dwellings could occur from unobscured rooflights on the eastern and western sides of the roof slope at the property. 7. However, there are no windows on the facing elevation of No. 34 at this level, such that views in this direction from the rooflights at the appeal property would not look directly into habitable rooms. In addition, the height and angle of the rooflights relative to the neighbouring bungalow at No. 30 would also ensure no direct views into habitable rooms at this dwelling.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 the east, a two storey detached dwelling.

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — the east, a two storey detached dwelling. As such, occupiers of these properties would not have their enjoyment of habitable rooms impacted by the proposal as there would be no loss of privacy. 8. Views from the unobstructed rooflights towards the rear amenity spaces of Nos. 30 and 34 would be possible but largely peripheral. In any event, even when looking in the direction of the neighbouring rear gardens, due to the angles of the rooflights the views of these spaces would not be clear or direct. As such, an overall limited level of actual and perceived overlooking of these spaces would result such that the privacy of neighbouring occupiers would not be unduly harmed. 9. Accordingly, the removal of the requirement for the rooflights at the property to be obscured would not result in unacceptable harm to neighbouring occupiers by way of overlooking. As such, condition 3 is neither reasonable or necessary in the interests of the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos. 30 and 34 Queen Eleanors Road, with regards to privacy. Other Matters 10. I note that the appellant has sought the removal of the condition in the interests of light and ventilation, and that these are already adequately provided by the other windows at the property.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 the east, a two storey detached dwelling.

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — the east, a two storey detached dwelling. I further acknowledge that it is unlikely the disputed condition would be applicable to the rooflight above the staircase, given its distance from the floor. Nevertheless, I still consider that the condition is neither necessary or reasonable in the interests of residential amenity and privacy of neighbouring occupiers. Conclusion 11. For the reasons given above, the appeal is allowed, and the planning permission is varied by deleting condition 3.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 C Rafferty

32 Queen Eleanors Road, GUILDFORD, GU2 7SL — Guildford Borough Council — C Rafferty INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶3

The removal of condition 3 would not result in unacceptable harm to neighbouring occupiers by way of overlooking.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶4

The rooflights have been fitted, and the properties are situated close together, making it possible that a degree of overlooking of the neighbouring dwellings could occur.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
N/A
Unclear

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 24 August 2022 under the Open Government Licence.