The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH
St Albans City Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Inspector
- Aqbal M
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Other
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appellant
- Mr Lee Turner
- Agent
- Planning Insight
- LPA reference
- 5/2021/2378
- ONS LPA code
- E07000240
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 7 April 2022
Summary AI
The appeal to vary conditions associated with a planning permission for a development in the Green Belt was dismissed. The proposal would result in inappropriate development, causing harm to the openness and purposes of the Green Belt, and very special circumstances were not found to justify the development.
PDF text
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — by M Aqbal BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11 November 2022
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — Nicholls Farm, The Barn, Lybury Lane, Redbourn AL3 7JH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr Lee Turner against the decision of St Albans City Council. • The application Ref 5/21/2378, dated 13 August 2021, was refused by notice dated 12 November 2021. • The application sought planning permission for change of use from general industrial to Class C3 (residential), retention of swimming pool and associated landscaping and decking and ancillary barn for garage and office following demolition of previous industrial building (retrospective) without complying with conditions 1 and 3 attached to planning permission Ref 5/20/2784, dated 21 May 2021. • The conditions in dispute are numbers 1 and 3 which state that: Condition 1. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: DNG No.'s 0051-001_P1, 0051-08_P1, 0051-10_P1, 0051-09_P1, 0051-03_P2. Condition 3.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — Nicholls Farm, The Barn, Lybury Lane, Redbourn AL3 7JH Within 6 months of the date of this permission the roof of the garage shall be altered in accordance with the approved plans (DNG No. 0051-09_P1). • The reasons given for the conditions are: Condition 1. For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. Condition 3. As the site is within the Metropolitan Green Belt the development would otherwise be harmful. To comply with Policy 1 and 13 of the St. Albans District Local Plan Review 1994.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/B1930/W/21/3287291 time to undertake the necessary alterations is also sought. The variation of condition 1 is to reflect the proposed drawing. | The application is made under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act | | --- | | 1990 to vary conditions associated with a planning permission. These | | provisions can be used to seek a minor material amendment. However, h |
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of | The application is made under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act | | --- | | 1990 to vary conditions associated with a planning permission. These | | provisions can be used to seek a minor material amendment. However, h |
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of prergoavrisdi otnos t hcaen r ebaes uonse fdo rt oc osnedeikt ioan m 3i naonrd m thaete erivaild aemnceen bdemfoernet .m Heo,w tehvee ar,p phraovvinegd garage forms part of a wider redevelopment proposal for a site within the Green Belt. As such, the main issues are whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary in respect of the following matters: • Whether the proposal would result in inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the ‘Framework’) and relevant development plan policies; • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt; and, • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal. Reasons Inappropriate development 6. Policy 1 of the St. Albans District Local Plan Review (1994) (‘LP’) sets out the extent of the Green Belt and specifies certain types of development which would be acceptable in the Green Belt. The proposal before me does not fall under any of those accepted forms of development. 7.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of Policy 13 of the LP supports extension to houses in the Green Belt, including garages or outbuildings, however this is subject to considerations in relation to scale and visual impact. 8. Both the above policies pre-date the Framework. Furthermore, together these policies do not recognise the full extent of exceptions to inappropriate development detailed in the Framework. In this regard, these are therefore inconsistent with the Framework to which I attach greater weight. 9. The consented scheme was determined and found to be acceptable having regard to what was then Paragraph 145 (g) of the Framework and has now been replaced by Paragraph 149 (g) in the current version of the Framework. This supports ‘limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed land, whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), which do not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development;’. 10. Although the development that pre-existed on the site has been removed, I have been provided with sufficient information in respect of this, including its layout, form and volume which is not disputed by the Council. 11.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of There would be an increase in footprint between the development that pre-existed and what is proposed. Nevertheless, the footprint increase would be no different to the consented scheme. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of There would be an increase in footprint between the development that pre-existed and what is proposed. Nevertheless, the footprint increase would be no different to the consented scheme. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of Appeal Decision APP/B1930/W/21/3287291 12. However, even if I were to accept that there is no change between the volume of the buildings that pre-existed at the site and those that form part of the proposed scheme, which includes the proposed garage. The latter is appreciably larger than the garage that existed on the site and would also be located closer to the site’s northern boundary. Consequently, this would be more visually dominant in views from the north and north east, and thereby would have a greater visual impact on the site than the development that pre-existed on the site. This would have an erosive effect on the visual openness of the Green Belt. 13. As such, the proposal would be inappropriate development under Paragraph 149 (g) of the Framework. 14. The appellant argues that the proposal relates to the alteration of a consented building and therefore falls to be considered under paragraph 149(c) of the Framework, which supports ‘the extension or alteration of a building provided that it does not result in disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building;’. 15.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of The Framework defines ‘original building’ as ‘A building as it existed on 1 July 1948 or, if constructed after 1 July 1948, as it was built originally.’ In this case, the consented building (flat roofed garage approved under planning permission 5/20/2784) does not exist. As such the proposal does not benefit from the exemption under paragraph 149 (c) of the Framework. 16. For the above reasons, and because the proposal does not fall to be considered under any other exemption under paragraph 149 of the Framework, the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Openness and purposes of the Green Belt 17. Paragraph 137 of the Framework, states that the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence. The extent to which a proposal may cause harm to openness, might depend on factors such as its spatial and/or visual implications. This is a matter of planning judgement. 18. Having found that the proposal would result in a greater visual impact, this would harm the openness of the Green Belt. 19.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of However, because the appeal site comprises a developed site, the proposal would not conflict with any of the purposes of the Green Belt as set out under paragraph 138 of the Framework. Other Considerations 20. Although the proposed garage would have a reduced eaves height relative to the consented garage, because of its pitched roof, overall, it would be a taller building with a greater volume and mass. Therefore, the proposed garage is noticeably larger in scale than the consented garage. 21. The appellant argues that the consented garage is visually unappealing and of poor design because it fails to relate to the host building which incorporates a pitched roof. However, the approved scheme was considered in light of national and local planning policies and found to be acceptable. Moreover, the flat roof design of the garage formed part of the Council’s assessment that the consented scheme would not be inappropriate development in the Green Belt. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of Appeal Decision APP/B1930/W/21/3287291 22. I have also had regard to the appeal decision for a previous development at the appeal site, in which the Inspector acknowledged that its design was sympathetic to its surroundings. Nevertheless, that appeal was dismissed and related to a garage/office building of a different design. As such, this attracts little weight in favour of the proposal. 23. For the above reasons, I attach limited weight to the differences in scale and any perceived design benefits of the proposal, relative to the consented garage. Planning Balance and Conclusion 24. The proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, which would by definition be harmful to it. There would also be some harm to the openness of the Green Belt. 25. The Framework is clear that substantial weight should be given to any harm to the Green Belt and very special circumstances will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. 26. Whilst I have had regard to the other considerations, they do not clearly outweigh the totality of harm the scheme would cause.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — garage. Principally, this incorporates a shallow pitched roof. An extension of Consequently, the very special circumstances to justify the inappropriate development do not exist. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to the aims of policies 1 and 13 of the LP and the Green Belt provisions of the Framework. 27. For the above reasons, I conclude that condition 3 is reasonable and necessary with regard to protecting the Green Belt. Accordingly, it is not necessary to vary this or condition 1 and the appeal should be dismissed.
The Barn, Nicholls Farm, Lybury Lane , Redbourn, AL3 7JH — St Albans City Council — M Aqbal INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶13
The proposal does not benefit from the exemption under paragraph 149 (c) of the Framework, as the consented building does not exist. The proposal would result in a greater visual impact, causing harm to the openness of the Green Belt.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶17
The proposed garage would have a greater visual impact, causing harm to the openness of the Green Belt.
Planning obligations For appellant
The appellant argues that the consented garage is visually unappealing and of poor design, but this is not considered sufficient to outweigh the harm caused by the proposal.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Paragraph 149 (g) of the Framework |
Substantial |
| Paragraph 138 of the Framework |
Moderate |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 November 2022 under the Open Government Licence.